Division of Child Health, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia; Respiratory and Sleep Department, Queensland Children's Hospital, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, New Jersey Medical School, Pulmonary and Allergy Associates, Morristown, NJ.
Chest. 2019 Jul;156(1):131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.035. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
BACKGROUND: Whether gastroesophageal reflux (GER) or GER disease (GERD) causes chronic cough in children is controversial. Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) format, we undertook four systematic reviews. For children with chronic cough (> 4-weeks duration) and without underlying lung disease: (1) who do not have gastrointestinal GER symptoms, should empirical treatment for GERD be used? (2) with gastrointestinal GER symptoms, does treatment for GERD resolve the cough? (3) with or without gastrointestinal GER symptoms, what GER-based therapies should be used and for how long? (4) if GERD is suspected as the cause, what investigations and diagnostic criteria best determine GERD as the cause of the cough? METHODS: We used the CHEST Expert Cough Panel's protocol and American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) methodological guidelines and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. Delphi methodology was used to obtain consensus. RESULTS: Few randomized controlled trials addressed the first two questions and none addressed the other two. The single meta-analysis (two randomized controlled trials) showed no significant difference between the groups (any intervention for GERD vs placebo for cough resolution; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.45-2.93; P = .78). Proton pump inhibitors (vs placebo) caused increased serious adverse events. Qualitative data from existing CHEST cough systematic reviews were consistent with two international GERD guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The panelists endorsed that: (1) treatment(s) for GERD should not be used when there are no clinical features of GERD; and (2) pediatric GERD guidelines should be used to guide treatment and investigations.
背景:胃食管反流(GER)或胃食管反流病(GERD)是否会导致儿童慢性咳嗽存在争议。我们采用人群、干预、比较、结局(PICO)格式进行了四项系统评价。对于慢性咳嗽(>4 周)且无潜在肺部疾病的儿童:(1)如果没有胃肠道 GER 症状,是否应进行 GERD 的经验性治疗?(2)有胃肠道 GER 症状时,GERD 治疗是否能缓解咳嗽?(3)有无胃肠道 GER 症状,应使用何种基于 GER 的治疗方法,治疗时间多长?(4)如果怀疑 GERD 是病因,哪些检查和诊断标准最能确定 GERD 是咳嗽的病因?
方法:我们使用了 CHEST 专家咳嗽小组的方案和美国胸科医师学会(CHEST)方法学指南以及 GRADE(推荐评估、制定与评价)框架。采用 Delphi 方法获得共识。
结果:很少有随机对照试验涉及前两个问题,也没有一个涉及其他两个问题。唯一的荟萃分析(两项随机对照试验)显示,两组之间无显著差异(任何 GERD 治疗与咳嗽缓解的安慰剂;比值比,1.14;95%可信区间,0.45-2.93;P=0.78)。质子泵抑制剂(与安慰剂相比)导致严重不良事件增加。现有 CHEST 咳嗽系统评价的定性数据与两项国际 GERD 指南一致。
结论:专家组认可以下内容:(1)当没有 GERD 的临床特征时,不应使用 GERD 的治疗方法;(2)应使用儿科 GERD 指南来指导治疗和检查。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023-6
Nihon Rinsho. 2016-8
Pediatrics. 2013-4-29
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023-12
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022-6-30
World Allergy Organ J. 2022-5-14
Front Pediatr. 2022-4-15
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2022-3
Front Pharmacol. 2022-2-10
Clin Transl Sci. 2021-9
Arch Dis Child. 2018-1
Arq Gastroenterol. 2017-12
Arch Dis Child. 2017-9-7
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017-9
Transl Pediatr. 2012-7