Suppr超能文献

咳嗽在成人中的症状分类和管理算法:CHEST 指南和专家小组报告。

Classification of Cough as a Symptom in Adults and Management Algorithms: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

机构信息

UMassMemorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA.

UMassMemorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA.

出版信息

Chest. 2018 Jan;153(1):196-209. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We performed systematic reviews using the population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) format to answer the following key clinical question: Are the CHEST 2006 classifications of acute, subacute and chronic cough and associated management algorithms in adults that were based on durations of cough useful?

METHODS

We used the CHEST Expert Cough Panel's protocol for the systematic reviews and the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) methodological guidelines and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Data from the systematic reviews in conjunction with patient values and preferences and the clinical context were used to form recommendations or suggestions. Delphi methodology was used to obtain the final grading.

RESULTS

With respect to acute cough (< 3 weeks), only three studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and all had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 CHEST Cough Guidelines, the most common causes were respiratory infections, most likely of viral cause, followed by exacerbations of underlying diseases such as asthma and COPD and pneumonia. The subjects resided on three continents: North America, Europe, and Asia. With respect to subacute cough (duration, 3-8 weeks), only two studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and both had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 guidelines, the most common causes were postinfectious cough and exacerbation of underlying diseases such as asthma, COPD, and upper airway cough syndrome (UACS). The subjects resided in countries in Asia. With respect to chronic cough (> 8 weeks), 11 studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and all had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 guidelines, the most common causes were UACS from rhinosinus conditions, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, combinations of these four conditions, and, less commonly, a variety of miscellaneous conditions and atopic cough in Asian countries. The subjects resided on four continents: North America, South America, Europe, and Asia.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the quality of evidence was low, the published literature since 2006 suggests that CHEST's 2006 Cough Guidelines and management algorithms for acute, subacute, and chronic cough in adults appeared useful in diagnosing and treating patients with cough around the globe. These same algorithms have been updated to reflect the advances in cough management as of 2017.

摘要

背景

我们采用人群-干预-比较-结局(PICO)格式进行系统评价,以回答以下关键临床问题:基于咳嗽持续时间制定的成人急性、亚急性和慢性咳嗽的 CHEST 2006 分类以及相关管理算法是否有用?

方法

我们使用 CHEST 专家咳嗽小组的系统评价方案以及美国胸科学会(CHEST)的方法学指南和推荐评估、制定和评估框架。将系统评价中的数据与患者价值观和偏好以及临床情况相结合,形成建议。采用德尔菲法获取最终分级。

结果

在急性咳嗽(<3 周)方面,只有三项研究符合我们的质量评估标准,且所有研究均具有较高的偏倚风险。正如 2006 年 CHEST 咳嗽指南所预测的那样,最常见的病因是呼吸道感染,很可能是病毒引起的,其次是哮喘和 COPD 等基础疾病的加重以及肺炎。研究对象分布在三大洲:北美洲、欧洲和亚洲。在亚急性咳嗽(持续时间 3-8 周)方面,只有两项研究符合我们的质量评估标准,且均具有较高的偏倚风险。正如 2006 年指南所预测的那样,最常见的病因是感染后咳嗽和哮喘、COPD、上气道咳嗽综合征(UACS)等基础疾病的加重。研究对象居住在亚洲国家。在慢性咳嗽(>8 周)方面,11 项研究符合我们的质量评估标准,且均具有较高的偏倚风险。正如 2006 年指南所预测的那样,最常见的病因是鼻后滴注综合征、哮喘、胃食管反流病、非哮喘嗜酸性粒细胞性支气管炎、这四种情况的组合,以及亚洲国家较少见的各种杂项病因和特应性咳嗽。研究对象分布在四大洲:北美洲、南美洲、欧洲和亚洲。

结论

尽管证据质量较低,但自 2006 年以来的已发表文献表明,CHEST 2006 年咳嗽指南和成人急性、亚急性和慢性咳嗽的管理算法在全球范围内对诊断和治疗咳嗽患者似乎有用。这些相同的算法已经更新,以反映截至 2017 年咳嗽管理方面的进展。

相似文献

2
Cough in the Athlete: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.运动员咳嗽:CHEST指南与专家小组报告
Chest. 2017 Feb;151(2):441-454. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.054. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
A Critical Review of the Quality of Cough Clinical Practice Guidelines.咳嗽临床实践指南质量的批判性评价
Chest. 2016 Oct;150(4):777-788. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 May 7.
6
Causes of Chronic Cough in Non-smoking Patients.非吸烟患者慢性咳嗽的病因
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;873:25-33. doi: 10.1007/5584_2015_153.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验