Yoshida Midori, Yanuaryska Ryna Dwi, Shantiningsih Rurie Ratna, Mudjosemedi Munakhir, Honda Eiichi
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan.
Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.
J Environ Radioact. 2019 Aug;204:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
The purpose of the study was to obtain basic data to identify problems in radiation education in a situation where confidence in nuclear power has fluctuated over time and fear of nuclear power has increased globally due to nuclear power plant disasters at Chernobyl and Fukushima. We conducted a questionnaire survey on understanding and risk perception of radiation and atomic power, before and after lectures, for 107 Japanese and 137 Indonesian dental students. Thirty-six phrases were extracted from two supplementary texts about radiation created by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and 30 events commonly used in research on risk perception were used. The students were asked to rate their level of understanding of 36 phrases and risk perception of 30 events. Moreover, the students were asked to answer 6 general questions about radiation. For Japanese students, understanding of radiation increased and risk perception for both nuclear power and X-rays decreased after lectures (p < 0.05). Concerning nuclear power, the risk-value declined as the level of understanding increased (p < 0.01). However, for Indonesian students, who had lectures on only radiation excluding nuclear power in dental radiology, risk perception increased for X-ray after lectures (p < 0.05). This indicates that thought and custom, in the absence of knowledge, are influenced by lectures. In general, it is said that increase in knowledge will lower risk perception, but even if radiation education is imparted, risk perception may rise if the lectures are not understood properly. It was concluded that educators need to incorporate sufficient knowledge in their teachings, and correct thinking, to mitigate the risk of future radiation education giving the opposite of the intended effect.
本研究的目的是获取基础数据,以识别在核能信心随时间波动,且由于切尔诺贝利和福岛核电站灾难导致全球对核能的恐惧增加的情况下,放射教育中存在的问题。我们对107名日本牙科学生和137名印度尼西亚牙科学生在讲座前后进行了关于辐射和原子能的理解及风险认知的问卷调查。从日本文部科学省编写的两篇关于辐射的补充文本中提取了36个短语,并使用了30个在风险认知研究中常用的事件。要求学生对36个短语的理解程度和30个事件的风险认知进行评分。此外,还要求学生回答6个关于辐射的一般性问题。对于日本学生,讲座后对辐射的理解有所增加,对核能和X射线的风险认知均有所下降(p<0.05)。关于核能,风险值随着理解程度的提高而下降(p<0.01)。然而,对于仅在牙科放射学中接受了不包括核能的辐射讲座的印度尼西亚学生,讲座后对X射线的风险认知有所增加(p<0.05)。这表明在缺乏知识的情况下,思想和习惯会受到讲座的影响。一般来说,人们认为知识的增加会降低风险认知,但即使进行放射教育,如果讲座没有被正确理解,风险认知可能会上升。研究得出结论,教育工作者需要在教学中融入足够的知识和正确的思维方式,以降低未来放射教育产生与预期效果相反作用的风险。