Arizona State University, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, USA.
Arizona State University, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, USA.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019 May;35:201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
and Purpose: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) for substance use disorders (SUD) have shown promising results. However, acceptability of MBIs in the context of SUD treatment has yet to be systematically assessed across published studies. Our aims were to (a) review the literature for assessments of acceptability; (b) summarize how, when, and for whom acceptability is being measured; and (c) create suggestions for best practices in measuring acceptability of MBIs for SUD.
Five databases were searched with key terms related to mindfulness, relapse prevention, and SUD.
Results highlight that studies of MBIs for SUD treatment lack acceptability assessment, a consistent definition of acceptability, and standardized measurements of acceptability.
The lack of measurement and conceptual consistency make it difficult to conclude acceptability of MBIs for SUD treatment. It is imperative that more efforts be directed toward measurement of intervention acceptability to assess whether such interventions could be taken to scale.
基于正念的干预（MBI）在物质使用障碍（SUD）方面已显示出良好的效果。然而，在 SUD 治疗背景下，MBI 的可接受性尚未在已发表的研究中得到系统评估。我们的目的是：（a）综述文献中对可接受性的评估；（b）总结可接受性的测量方法、时间和对象；（c）为 SUD 的 MBI 可接受性测量提出最佳实践建议。
使用与正念、复发预防和 SUD 相关的关键词在五个数据库中进行检索。
结果表明，SUD 治疗中 MBI 的研究缺乏可接受性评估、可接受性的一致定义以及可接受性的标准化测量。
缺乏测量和概念一致性使得难以确定 SUD 治疗中 MBI 的可接受性。有必要投入更多的精力来衡量干预措施的可接受性，以评估这些干预措施是否可以推广。
