Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1723-1730. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.060. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
Direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty can be performed through a traditional vertical incision or a horizontal (bikini) incision. The purpose of this study is to compare the 2 approaches, performed by a single surgeon past the learning curve, in terms of (1) overall wound complications and (2) patient-reported esthetics at the 6-month follow-up.
A case-control retrospective study was conducted. Eighty-six bikini DAA patients were matched 3:1 to 230 conventional DAA patients for gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Outcomes evaluated included wound complications, acute periprosthetic joint infection, transfusion, length of surgery, and dysesthesia. A subgroup analysis was also performed on obese patients, BMI greater than 30 kg/m. Furthermore, the patients rated cosmesis of the incision at 6 months using a Patient Scar Assessment Scale and the Vancouver Scar Assessment Scale.
Bikini patients had lower rates of delayed wound healing compared to conventional incision (2.3% vs 6.1%, P = .087). This difference was statistically significant (0% vs 16.6%, P < .05) in obese patients. There was no difference in terms of incision cosmesis between the 2 incision types.
Our study demonstrates that the DAA total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely through an alternative horizontal bikini incision with complication rates equivalent to conventional incision DAA and to those in other approaches when performed by surgeons in a high volume, efficient hip replacement institution. In patients whose BMI is >30, a potential benefit of the horizontal incision may be lower wound complications. This study design should be performed at other institutions and ideally at a multi-institution level to evaluate if results can be corroborated. Our opinion is that the horizontal bikini incision should be utilized but only after mastery of the DAA approach using the conventional vertical incision.
直接前方入路(DAA)全髋关节置换术可通过传统的垂直切口或水平(比基尼)切口进行。本研究的目的是比较由同一位外科医生在越过学习曲线后进行的两种方法,在以下两个方面:(1)总体伤口并发症和(2)6 个月随访时患者报告的美学效果。
进行了一项病例对照回顾性研究。86 例比基尼 DAA 患者按性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)和美国麻醉医师协会评分与 230 例常规 DAA 患者 3:1 匹配。评估的结果包括伤口并发症、急性假体周围关节感染、输血、手术时间和感觉异常。还对肥胖患者(BMI 大于 30kg/m)进行了亚组分析。此外,患者在 6 个月时使用患者疤痕评估量表和温哥华疤痕评估量表评估切口的美观度。
与常规切口相比,比基尼患者的延迟愈合率较低(2.3%比 6.1%,P=.087)。在肥胖患者中,这种差异具有统计学意义(0%比 16.6%,P<.05)。两种切口类型的切口美观度无差异。
我们的研究表明,DAA 全髋关节置换术可以通过替代的水平比基尼切口安全进行,其并发症发生率与传统切口 DAA 相当,在高容量、高效髋关节置换机构中,与其他入路相当。对于 BMI>30 的患者,水平切口的潜在益处可能是较低的伤口并发症。这种研究设计应在其他机构进行,理想情况下在多机构水平进行,以评估结果是否可以得到证实。我们的观点是,在掌握了传统垂直切口的 DAA 方法后,应该使用水平比基尼切口,但仅应在掌握了传统垂直切口的 DAA 方法后使用。