• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接前方入路(DSA)在全髋关节置换术中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy and safety of direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (Gansu Provincial Hospital), Lanzhou, China.

Orthopedics IV, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Donggang West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 10;18(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04233-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-023-04233-2
PMID:37817232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10563322/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of the direct superior approach and the conventional surgical approach.

DATE SOURCES

From PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and China Knowledge Network up to January 30, 2023.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 7 case series involving 4306 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were included, including 679 patients with direct superior approach. All outcome measures: Oxford Hip Score [MD = 0.30, 95% CI (- 0.87, 1.47), P = 0.62], Hip Harris Score [MD = - 0.18, 95% CI (- 0.86, 0.49), P = 0.59], intraoperative blood loss [MD = - 54.14, 95% CI (- 102.75,-5.52), P = 0.03], transfusion rate [MD = 0.49, 95% CI (0.29, 0.83), P = 0.008], Limb Length Differences [MD = - 0.21, 95% CI (0.02, 0.39), P = 0.03], Length of Stay [MD = - 0.61, 95% CI (- 0.69, - 0.52), P < 0.00001].

CONCLUSIONS

The DSA was superior to conventional access in terms of incision length, bleeding, postoperative transfusion rate, and early postoperative HHS. In addition, our study found that because the DSA has less tissue damage, it has the potential advantages of accelerating patient recovery after surgery, shortening hospitalization time, and reducing patient economic pressure, which can significantly improve patient quality of life and satisfaction.

摘要

目的

系统评价直接前路和传统手术入路的临床安全性和疗效。

资料来源

检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和中国知网,检索时间截至 2023 年 1 月 30 日。

主要结果

共纳入 7 项病例系列研究,共计 4306 例接受全髋关节置换术的患者,其中 679 例采用直接前路入路。所有结局指标:牛津髋关节评分[MD=0.30,95%CI(-0.87,1.47),P=0.62]、髋关节 Harris 评分[MD=-0.18,95%CI(-0.86,0.49),P=0.59]、术中失血量[MD=-54.14,95%CI(-102.75,-5.52),P=0.03]、输血率[MD=0.49,95%CI(0.29,0.83),P=0.008]、肢体长度差异[MD=-0.21,95%CI(0.02,0.39),P=0.03]、住院时间[MD=-0.61,95%CI(-0.69,-0.52),P<0.00001]。

结论

与传统入路相比,DSA 在切口长度、出血量、术后输血率和术后早期 HHS 方面具有优势。此外,我们的研究发现,由于 DSA 对组织的损伤较小,因此具有加速术后患者康复、缩短住院时间和减轻患者经济压力的潜在优势,从而显著提高患者的生活质量和满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/30c50e981610/13018_2023_4233_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/d5d27b3bdfcd/13018_2023_4233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/c6fac0b17cfb/13018_2023_4233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/8831632ec9bd/13018_2023_4233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/c066a9623d77/13018_2023_4233_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/afcaeb8644ca/13018_2023_4233_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/5eae3f65270e/13018_2023_4233_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/abbd23dc527f/13018_2023_4233_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/9eb6208722d6/13018_2023_4233_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/a36f522d4b7e/13018_2023_4233_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/30c50e981610/13018_2023_4233_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/d5d27b3bdfcd/13018_2023_4233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/c6fac0b17cfb/13018_2023_4233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/8831632ec9bd/13018_2023_4233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/c066a9623d77/13018_2023_4233_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/afcaeb8644ca/13018_2023_4233_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/5eae3f65270e/13018_2023_4233_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/abbd23dc527f/13018_2023_4233_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/9eb6208722d6/13018_2023_4233_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/a36f522d4b7e/13018_2023_4233_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c1/10563322/30c50e981610/13018_2023_4233_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接前方入路(DSA)在全髋关节置换术中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 10;18(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04233-2.
2
Efficacy and safety of single- and double-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.静脉注射氨甲环酸单次与双次剂量用于髋膝关节置换术的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 10;18(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03929-9.
3
Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.直接前入路与后外侧入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术的疗效比较:Meta 分析与系统评价。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):1378-1392. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2193424.
4
Earlier functional recovery and discharge from hospital for THA patients operated on via direct superior compared to standard posterior approach: a retrospective frequency-matched case-control study. 直接前路入路与标准后外侧入路行全髋关节置换术的患者相比,前者具有更早的功能恢复和更早出院的趋势:一项回顾性频数匹配病例对照研究。
Hip Int. 2023 Jul;33(4):620-627. doi: 10.1177/11207000221086506. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Oral vs intravenous tranexamic acid in total-knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术中口服与静脉注射氨甲环酸的系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(20):e15248. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015248.
6
Minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus lateral transmuscular approach for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创前外侧入路与外侧经肌入路全髋关节置换术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgeon. 2022 Oct;20(5):e254-e261. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
Combined use of intravenous and topical versus intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total knee and hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.原发性全膝关节和髋关节置换术中静脉注射与局部应用氨甲环酸联合使用对比静脉注射氨甲环酸:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Feb 2;12(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0520-4.
8
SuperPATH Minimally Invasive Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Preliminary Clinical Results.SuperPATH 微创入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术:初步临床结果。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):74-85. doi: 10.1111/os.12584. Epub 2019 Dec 29.
9
Hip Replacement as Alternative to Intramedullary Nail in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.髋关节置换术与髓内钉治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折老年患者的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):745-754. doi: 10.1111/os.12532.
10
Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty.直接和间接比较在 SuperPATH、全髋关节置换术直接前入路和后入路的网络荟萃分析中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 6;12(1):16778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20242-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Meta-Analyses of Total Hip Arthroplasty Produce Reliable Results? A Systematic Review and Meta-Epidemiological Study of Statistical Methods.全髋关节置换术的Meta分析能得出可靠结果吗?一项关于统计方法的系统评价和Meta流行病学研究。
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):1936-1955. doi: 10.1111/os.70077. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Postoperative Patient-Reported Pain and Opioid Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of the Direct Superior and Posterior Approaches.全髋关节置换术后患者报告的疼痛及阿片类药物使用情况:直接前入路与后入路的倾向评分匹配比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 20;14(5):1400. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051400.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Dislocation and Outcome Between Piriformis-Sparing and Conventional Posterior Approach After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Over 60 Years.60岁以上患者股骨颈骨折双极半髋关节置换术后梨状肌保留入路与传统后入路的脱位情况及疗效比较
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr;38(4):732-736. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.025. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
2
Earlier functional recovery and discharge from hospital for THA patients operated on via direct superior compared to standard posterior approach: a retrospective frequency-matched case-control study. 直接前路入路与标准后外侧入路行全髋关节置换术的患者相比,前者具有更早的功能恢复和更早出院的趋势:一项回顾性频数匹配病例对照研究。
Hip Int. 2023 Jul;33(4):620-627. doi: 10.1177/11207000221086506. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
3
Early Postoperative Outcomes of the Direct Superior Approach versus the Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
全髋关节置换术中直接前路与后路手术的早期术后结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 22;13(21):6291. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216291.
4
The Direct Superior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.直接上方入路在全髋关节置换术中的应用:一项系统评价。
JBJS Rev. 2024 Mar 15;12(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00182. eCollection 2024 Mar 1.
Overview and Spinal Implications of Leg Length Discrepancy: Narrative Review.下肢长度差异的概述及其对脊柱的影响:叙述性综述。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(2):127-134. doi: 10.4055/cios20224. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Direct superior approach for total hip arthroplasty.直接上级入路全髋关节置换术。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Mar;103-B(3):500-506. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B3.BJJ-2020-0916.R1.
6
Direct superior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial on early outcomes on gait, risk of fall, clinical and self-reported measurements.直接上级入路与后外侧入路在全髋关节置换术中的比较:一项关于步态、跌倒风险、临床和自我报告测量的早期结果的随机对照试验。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Jun;92(3):274-279. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1865633. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
7
Comparison of total hip arthroplasty with minimally invasive SuperPath approach vs. conventional posterolateral approach in elderly patients: A one-year follow-up randomized controlled research.老年患者全髋关节置换术微创 SuperPath 入路与传统后外侧入路的比较:一项为期一年的随访随机对照研究。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Mar;44(3):531-536. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
No Learning Curve of the Direct Superior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中直接上级入路无学习曲线。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):852-860. doi: 10.1111/os.12689. Epub 2020 May 18.
9
The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: No Evidence for Superior Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Direct Anterior Approach at 1.5 Months Postoperatively, and Through a 5-Year Follow-Up.AAHKS 临床研究奖:直接前入路全髋关节置换术后 1.5 个月及 5 年随访时,患者报告的结局评分无明显优势。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S15-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
10
Length of Stay, Discharge Disposition, and 90-Day Complications and Revisions Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of the Direct Anterior, Posterolateral, and Direct Superior Approaches.初次全髋关节置换术后的住院时间、出院去向以及 90 天内并发症和翻修情况:直接前入路、后外侧入路和直接前上方入路的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6):1658-1661. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.082. Epub 2020 Feb 5.