• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会性群体整个生命周期中的性分配冲突和性选择。

Sex-allocation conflict and sexual selection throughout the lifespan of eusocial colonies.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, Jyväskylä FI-40014, Finland.

出版信息

Evolution. 2019 Jun;73(6):1116-1132. doi: 10.1111/evo.13746. Epub 2019 May 3.

DOI:10.1111/evo.13746
PMID:31004345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6593813/
Abstract

Models of sex-allocation conflict are central to evolutionary biology but have mostly assumed static decisions, where resource allocation strategies are constant over colony lifespan. Here, we develop a model to study how the evolution of dynamic resource allocation strategies is affected by the queen-worker conflict in annual eusocial insects. We demonstrate that the time of dispersal of sexuals affects the sex-allocation ratio through sexual selection on males. Furthermore, our model provides three predictions that depart from established results of classic static allocation models. First, we find that the queen wins the sex-allocation conflict, while the workers determine the maximum colony size and colony productivity. Second, male-biased sex allocation and protandry evolve if sexuals disperse directly after eclosion. Third, when workers are more related to new queens, then the proportional investment into queens is expected to be lower, which results from the interacting effect of sexual selection (selecting for protandry) and sex-allocation conflict (selecting for earlier switch to producing sexuals). Overall, we find that colony ontogeny crucially affects the outcome of sex-allocation conflict because of the evolution of distinct colony growth phases, which decouples how queens and workers affect allocation decisions and can result in asymmetric control.

摘要

性分配冲突模型是进化生物学的核心,但大多数模型都假设决策是静态的,即资源分配策略在蚁群的生命周期内保持不变。在这里,我们开发了一个模型来研究在一年生群居昆虫中,女王-工蚁冲突如何影响动态资源分配策略的进化。我们证明,有性个体的扩散时间通过对雄性的性选择影响性分配比。此外,我们的模型提供了三个与经典静态分配模型的既定结果不同的预测。首先,我们发现女王赢得了性分配冲突,而工蚁决定了蚁群的最大规模和生产力。其次,如果有性个体在刚孵化后直接扩散,那么雄性偏斜的性分配和早性成熟就会进化。第三,如果工蚁与新女王的亲缘关系更密切,那么对女王的比例投资预计会更低,这是性选择(选择早性成熟)和性分配冲突(选择更早地转为产生有性个体)相互作用的结果。总的来说,我们发现由于不同的蚁群生长阶段的进化,蚁群个体发生对性分配冲突的结果至关重要,因为这会分离出女王和工蚁如何影响分配决策,并可能导致不对称控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/bddcf7a70adc/EVO-73-1116-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/285134ac5050/EVO-73-1116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/b0ec6fe73935/EVO-73-1116-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/142344e07656/EVO-73-1116-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/80142b433155/EVO-73-1116-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/9e6f906a0bd0/EVO-73-1116-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/85fb545dbeb2/EVO-73-1116-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/bddcf7a70adc/EVO-73-1116-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/285134ac5050/EVO-73-1116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/b0ec6fe73935/EVO-73-1116-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/142344e07656/EVO-73-1116-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/80142b433155/EVO-73-1116-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/9e6f906a0bd0/EVO-73-1116-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/85fb545dbeb2/EVO-73-1116-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/6593813/bddcf7a70adc/EVO-73-1116-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex-allocation conflict and sexual selection throughout the lifespan of eusocial colonies.社会性群体整个生命周期中的性分配冲突和性选择。
Evolution. 2019 Jun;73(6):1116-1132. doi: 10.1111/evo.13746. Epub 2019 May 3.
2
Sex ratio conflict and worker production in eusocial hymenoptera.群居膜翅目昆虫中的性别比例冲突与工蜂产生
Am Nat. 2001 Aug;158(2):166-77. doi: 10.1086/321311.
3
Sex-ratio conflict between queens and workers in eusocial Hymenoptera: mechanisms, costs, and the evolution of split colony sex ratios.群居性膜翅目昆虫中蚁后与工蚁之间的性别比例冲突:机制、代价及分群性别比例的进化
Evolution. 2005 Dec;59(12):2626-38.
4
Queen-Worker Conflict over Sexual Production and Colony Maintenance in Perennial Social Insects.多年生社会性昆虫中蜂王与工蜂在繁殖和群体维持方面的冲突
Am Nat. 1999 Oct;154(4):417-426. doi: 10.1086/303253.
5
Adaptive dynamic resource allocation in annual eusocial insects: environmental variation will not necessarily promote graded control.一年生群居昆虫中的适应性动态资源分配:环境变化不一定会促进分级控制。
BMC Ecol. 2007 Dec 19;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-7-16.
6
Queen-worker conflicts over male production and sex allocation in a primitively eusocial wasp.在一种原始社会性黄蜂中,蜂后与工蜂在雄性生产和性别分配上的冲突
Evolution. 2003 Oct;57(10):2365-73. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00248.x.
7
Sex investment ratios in eusocial Hymenoptera support inclusive fitness theory.群居性膜翅目昆虫的性别投资比例支持广义适合度理论。
J Evol Biol. 2015 Nov;28(11):2106-11. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12710. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
8
Effects of brood manipulation costs on optimal sex allocation in social hymenoptera.育雏操纵成本对社会性膜翅目昆虫最优性别分配的影响。
Am Nat. 2004 Sep;164(3):E73-82. doi: 10.1086/422659. Epub 2004 Jul 26.
9
Sex allocation conflict in insect societies: who wins?昆虫社会中的性别分配冲突:谁会胜出?
Biol Lett. 2009 Oct 23;5(5):700-4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0501. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
10
COLONY SEX RATIOS, CONFLICT BETWEEN QUEENS AND WORKERS, AND APPARENT QUEEN CONTROL IN THE ANT PHEIDOLE DESERTORUM.沙漠举腹蚁的蚁群性别比例、蚁后与工蚁之间的冲突以及明显的蚁后控制
Evolution. 1999 Oct;53(5):1470-1478. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05411.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Conflict and conflict resolution in the major transitions.主要转变中的冲突与解决冲突
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Oct 11;290(2008):20231420. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1420.
2
How competition between overlapping generations can influence optimal egg-laying strategies in annual social insects.重叠世代间的竞争如何影响一年生社会性昆虫的最优产卵策略。
Oecologia. 2023 Jul;202(3):535-547. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05411-z. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Evolutionary game theory and the adaptive dynamics approach: adaptation where individuals interact.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlates and Consequences of Worker Polymorphism in Ants.蚂蚁工蚁多态性的关联和后果。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2018 Jan 7;63:575-598. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043357. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
2
COLONY SEX RATIOS, CONFLICT BETWEEN QUEENS AND WORKERS, AND APPARENT QUEEN CONTROL IN THE ANT PHEIDOLE DESERTORUM.沙漠举腹蚁的蚁群性别比例、蚁后与工蚁之间的冲突以及明显的蚁后控制
Evolution. 1999 Oct;53(5):1470-1478. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05411.x.
3
The male has done his work - the male may go.男性已经完成了他的工作——男性可以离开了。
进化博弈论与适应性动力学方法:个体相互作用时的适应性
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210502. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0502. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
4
Queens control caste allocation in the ant .女王控制着蚂蚁的社会等级分配。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 8;290(1992):20221784. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1784.
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Aug;16:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 13.
4
Bumble bee colony dynamics: quantifying the importance of land use and floral resources for colony growth and queen production.大黄蜂蜂群动态:量化土地利用和花卉资源对蜂群增长及蜂王产生的重要性。
Ecol Lett. 2016 Apr;19(4):460-8. doi: 10.1111/ele.12581. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
No synergy needed: ecological constraints favor the evolution of eusociality.无需协同作用:生态限制因素有利于真社会性的进化。
Am Nat. 2015 Jul;186(1):31-40. doi: 10.1086/681637. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
6
Nourishment level affects caste-related gene expression in Polistes wasps.营养水平影响胡蜂的等级相关基因表达。
BMC Genomics. 2015 Mar 25;16(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1410-y.
7
Queen control of a key life-history event in a eusocial insect.女王控制群居昆虫的关键生活史事件。
Biol Lett. 2013 May 1;9(3):20130056. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0056. Print 2013 Jun 23.
8
Nature versus nurture in social insect caste differentiation.自然与培育在社会性昆虫的社会分工中的作用。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 May;25(5):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
9
Sex allocation conflict in insect societies: who wins?昆虫社会中的性别分配冲突:谁会胜出?
Biol Lett. 2009 Oct 23;5(5):700-4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0501. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
10
Resource allocation in a social wasp: effects of breeding system and life cycle on reproductive decisions.社会性黄蜂的资源分配:繁殖系统和生命周期对繁殖决策的影响。
Mol Ecol. 2009 Jul;18(13):2908-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04240.x. Epub 2009 May 29.