Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University, New Orleans.
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;34:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
Members of the American College of Epidemiology (ACE) Ethics Committee identified current ethics and epidemiology topic areas to consider for further discussion, consultation, teaching opportunities, and conference presentation. This article reflects on the activities of the Committee at the ACE Annual Meeting in New Orleans, Louisiana, September 24-26, 2017.
The overall aim for the Ethics Committee was to engage members of the College and other audiences and highlight the evolution of ethics and epidemiology since the inception of the original Ethics Guidelines published by the ACE Ethics and Standards of Practice Committee in 2000. The Ethics Committee organized a symposium session at the 2017 Annual Meeting of ACE on the ethics of human subjects research as it relates to specialized areas of epidemiology and the intersecting role of public health. This article presents a summary and further discussion of that symposium session.
Three topic areas were presented: an overview of ethics and epidemiology (E.S.P.), very high biomarker levels in environmental epidemiology research (S.M.P.), and the interface of epidemiology, human subjects research, and public health interventions (S.M.). This article begins by reviewing the foundations of epidemiology and public health and the well-known ethical principles of human subjects research. Then, it considers the ethical considerations in the use of population registry data in epidemiological research, environmental epidemiology, and epidemic surveillance and response. This article may form the basis of teaching of ethics principles related to epidemiology and public health and may serve as a companion piece to the original ACE Ethics Guidelines.
Researchers are increasingly faced with ethical considerations in diverse, nontraditional, and specialized areas of epidemiology and public health. This article illustrates these challenges with real-world examples of clinical and population registry data, the study of environmental biomarkers, and Zika virus epidemic; it also reviews relevant ethical principles underpinning these examples and identifies where gaps in knowledge may exist.
美国流行病学学会(ACE)伦理委员会的成员确定了当前需要讨论、咨询、教学机会和会议演讲的伦理和流行病学主题领域。本文反映了委员会在 2017 年 9 月 24 日至 26 日于路易斯安那州新奥尔良举行的 ACE 年会上的活动。
伦理委员会的总体目标是让学院成员和其他听众参与进来,并强调自 ACE 伦理与实践标准委员会于 2000 年发布最初的《伦理准则》以来,伦理与流行病学的演变。伦理委员会在 2017 年 ACE 年会上组织了一次关于人类受试者研究伦理的专题会议,该会议涉及流行病学的专门领域以及公共卫生的交叉作用。本文介绍了该专题会议的总结和进一步讨论。
提出了三个主题领域:伦理与流行病学概述(E.S.P.)、环境流行病学研究中非常高的生物标志物水平(S.M.P.)以及流行病学、人类受试者研究和公共卫生干预的界面(S.M.)。本文首先回顾了流行病学和公共卫生的基础以及人类受试者研究的著名伦理原则。然后,它考虑了在流行病学研究、环境流行病学和疾病监测与应对中使用人群登记数据的伦理考虑。本文可以作为与流行病学和公共卫生相关的伦理原则教学的基础,也可以作为 ACE 最初的《伦理准则》的补充。
研究人员在流行病学和公共卫生的不同、非传统和专门领域越来越多地面临伦理考虑。本文通过临床和人群登记数据、环境生物标志物研究以及寨卡病毒流行的实际例子说明了这些挑战,还回顾了这些例子所依据的相关伦理原则,并确定了知识空白的可能存在之处。