Salerno Jennifer, Knoppers Bartha M, Lee Lisa M, Hlaing WayWay M, Goodman Kenneth W
National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ann Epidemiol. 2017 May;27(5):297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 10.
This article reflects on the activities of the Ethics Committee of the American College of Epidemiology (ACE). Members of the Ethics Committee identified an opportunity to elaborate on knowledge gained since the inception of the original Ethics Guidelines published by the ACE Ethics and Standards of Practice Committee in 2000.
The ACE Ethics Committee presented a symposium session at the 2016 Epidemiology Congress of the Americas in Miami on the evolving complexities of ethics and epidemiology as it pertains to "big data." This article presents a summary and further discussion of that symposium session.
Three topic areas were presented: the policy implications of big data and computing, the fallacy of "secondary" data sources, and the duty of citizens to contribute to big data. A balanced perspective is needed that provides safeguards for individuals but also furthers research to improve population health. Our in-depth review offers next steps for teaching of ethics and epidemiology, as well as for epidemiological research, public health practice, and health policy.
To address contemporary topics in the area of ethics and epidemiology, the Ethics Committee hosted a symposium session on the timely topic of big data. Technological advancements in clinical medicine and genetic epidemiology research coupled with rapid advancements in data networks, storage, and computation at a lower cost are resulting in the growth of huge data repositories. Big data increases concerns about data integrity; informed consent; protection of individual privacy, confidentiality, and harm; data reidentification; and the reporting of faulty inferences.
本文回顾了美国流行病学学会(ACE)伦理委员会的活动。伦理委员会成员发现有机会详细阐述自ACE伦理与实践标准委员会于2000年发布原始伦理指南以来所获得的知识。
ACE伦理委员会在迈阿密举行的2016年美洲流行病学大会上举办了一场专题研讨会,探讨伦理与流行病学在涉及“大数据”方面不断演变的复杂性。本文对该专题研讨会进行了总结并进一步讨论。
研讨会提出了三个主题领域:大数据与计算的政策影响、“二手”数据源的谬误以及公民为大数据做出贡献的义务。需要一种平衡的观点,既要为个人提供保障,又要推动研究以改善人群健康。我们的深入审查为伦理与流行病学教学以及流行病学研究、公共卫生实践和卫生政策提供了下一步行动方向。
为解决伦理与流行病学领域的当代话题,伦理委员会就大数据这一及时的话题举办了一场专题研讨会。临床医学和基因流行病学研究中的技术进步,再加上数据网络、存储和计算以较低成本的快速发展,正导致巨大数据库的增长。大数据增加了对数据完整性、知情同意、个人隐私保护、保密性和伤害、数据重新识别以及错误推断报告等问题的担忧。