• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚弱对人工尿道括约肌置入和移除程序的影响。

The Impact of Frailty on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement and Removal Procedures.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA.

Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Urology. 2019 Jul;129:210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.015
PMID:31005655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6692072/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether frailty is associated with increased odds of 30-day surgical complications among men undergoing both artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement and removal procedures and to determine whether frailty was associated with increased odds of having an AUS removal procedure.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of men undergoing AUS placement and removal procedures using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2006 to 2013. Frailty was quantified using the NSQIP-FI (frailty index) and was applied to logistic regression models predicting 30-day complications (overall, major, and minor) and the odds of having an AUS removal procedure (over an AUS placement procedure).

RESULTS

We identified a total of 624 and 147 men undergoing AUS placement and removal procedures, respectively. NSQIP-FI of ≥0.27, but not age, was associated with major complications (aOR 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.9), while age ≥85 years, but not NSQIP-FI, was associated with minor complications (aOR 7.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-45.6). Men undergoing AUS removal procedures tended to be more frail compared to men undergoing AUS placement procedures (12.9% vs 6.1% had NSQIP-FI of ≥0.27, P<.01).

CONCLUSION

Men undergoing AUS removal procedures are, on average, more frail compared to men undergoing AUS placement procedures. Frailty is associated with increased odds of major complications and with having an AUS removal procedure. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating measures of frailty, instead of age alone, into the perioperative decision-making process for adults considering these types of procedures.

摘要

目的

确定虚弱是否与接受人工尿道括约肌(AUS)植入和取出手术的男性患者 30 天内发生手术并发症的风险增加相关,以及虚弱是否与 AUS 取出手术的风险增加相关。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)2006 年至 2013 年的数据,对接受 AUS 植入和取出手术的男性患者进行研究。使用 NSQIP-FI(虚弱指数)来量化虚弱,并将其应用于预测 30 天内并发症(总体、主要和次要)和 AUS 取出手术(与 AUS 植入手术相比)的可能性的逻辑回归模型中。

结果

我们共确定了 624 名和 147 名分别接受 AUS 植入和取出手术的男性患者。NSQIP-FI≥0.27,但不是年龄,与主要并发症相关(aOR 3.5,95%置信区间 1.2-9.9),而年龄≥85 岁,但不是 NSQIP-FI,与次要并发症相关(aOR 7.9,95%置信区间 1.4-45.6)。与接受 AUS 植入手术的男性相比,接受 AUS 取出手术的男性往往更虚弱(12.9% vs 6.1%的患者 NSQIP-FI≥0.27,P<.01)。

结论

与接受 AUS 植入手术的男性相比,接受 AUS 取出手术的男性平均更虚弱。虚弱与主要并发症的风险增加以及 AUS 取出手术的风险增加相关。这些发现强调了在考虑这些类型手术的成年人的围手术期决策过程中,除了年龄外,还应纳入虚弱程度的措施的重要性。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Frailty on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement and Removal Procedures.虚弱对人工尿道括约肌置入和移除程序的影响。
Urology. 2019 Jul;129:210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
2
Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.男性尿道悬吊带术与人工尿道括约肌治疗尿失禁的并发症发生率比较:基于美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的全国多机构分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1571-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1347-3. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
3
Frailty and the Role of Obliterative versus Reconstructive Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A National Study.衰弱与盆腔器官脱垂的闭塞性手术与重建性手术的作用:一项全国性研究。
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1502-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
4
Is artificial urinary sphincter surgery safe and effective in elderly males aged 70 years and above?70 岁及以上老年男性行人工尿控括约肌手术安全有效吗?
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022 Nov;14(6):416-420. doi: 10.1111/luts.12460. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
5
Robot-assisted laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter insertion in women with stress urinary incontinence: a pilot single-centre study.机器人辅助腹腔镜下人工尿失禁括约肌植入术治疗女性压力性尿失禁:单中心初步研究。
BJU Int. 2020 Dec;126(6):722-730. doi: 10.1111/bju.15147. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
Impact of frailty on complications in patients undergoing common urological procedures: a study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database.衰弱对接受常见泌尿外科手术患者并发症的影响:一项来自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进数据库的研究
BJU Int. 2016 May;117(5):836-42. doi: 10.1111/bju.13399. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
7
Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up.人工尿失禁括约肌(AUS)的疗效和安全性:具有中期随访的大型多机构队列患者的结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):710-718. doi: 10.1002/nau.23901. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Long-term functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800™) implantation in women aged over 75 years and suffering from stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency.75 岁以上因内括约肌缺陷导致压力性尿失禁的女性患者接受人工尿道括约肌(AMS 800™)植入后的长期功能结局。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3897-3902. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03702-9. Epub 2021 May 3.
9
Short term reoperation rates after artificial urinary sphincter placement in pediatric patients.儿童患者人工尿失禁括约肌植入术后短期再手术率。
Can J Urol. 2022 Oct;29(5):11318-11322.
10
[Laparoscopic robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter in women: First approach].[腹腔镜机器人辅助女性人工尿道括约肌:首次应用]
Prog Urol. 2019 Jul;29(7):371-377. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of conservative non-pharmacological interventions on the management of urinary incontinence in older adults living with frailty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.保守非药物干预对老年体弱患者尿失禁管理的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0322742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322742. eCollection 2025.
2
Frailty indices based on routinely collected data: a scoping review.基于常规收集数据的衰弱指数:一项范围综述
J Frailty Aging. 2025 Jun;14(3):100047. doi: 10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100047. Epub 2025 May 3.
3
Frailty and surgical outcomes in genitourinary prosthetic procedures: an ACS-NSQIP comparative analysis of risk indices.泌尿生殖假体手术中的衰弱与手术结局:一项基于美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)的风险指数比较分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04484-4.
4
Preoperative frailty and postoperative complications after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review.术前衰弱与非心脏手术后术后并发症:系统评价。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Sep;52(9):3000605241274553. doi: 10.1177/03000605241274553.
5
Risk Factors for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Explantation and Erosion in Male Nonneurological Patients.男性非神经源性患者人工尿道括约肌取出及侵蚀的危险因素
Int Neurourol J. 2024 Jun;28(2):147-155. doi: 10.5213/inj.2448086.043. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
6
Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: A Narrative Review.人工尿道括约肌并发症:叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 26;13(7):1913. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071913.
7
Association of Frailty and Complications Following Prostate Biopsy: Results From a Population-Based, Privately Insured Cohort.前列腺活检后衰弱与并发症的关联:基于人群的私人保险队列研究结果
Urol Pract. 2024 Jan;11(1):117-122. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000476. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
8
An evaluation of three validated comorbidity indices to predict short-term postoperative outcomes after prosthetic urologic surgery.评估三种经过验证的合并症指数以预测泌尿外科假体手术后的短期术后结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Mar;56(3):847-854. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03842-4. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
9
The impact of cognitive impairment in urologic implants: a narrative review.认知障碍对泌尿外科植入物的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Sep 30;12(9):1426-1438. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-226. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
10
Efficacy, Safety, and Reoperation-free Survival of Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Non-neurological Male Patients over 75 Years of Age.75岁以上非神经源性男性患者人工尿道括约肌的疗效、安全性及无再次手术生存率
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 May 16;53:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.014. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up.人工尿失禁括约肌(AUS)的疗效和安全性:具有中期随访的大型多机构队列患者的结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):710-718. doi: 10.1002/nau.23901. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
2
Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.前列腺切除术后尿动力学压力性尿失禁男性患者使用男性合成吊带与人工尿道括约肌的试验(MASTER):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Feb 21;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2501-2.
3
Waves of Change: National Trends in Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence.变革浪潮:男性压力性尿失禁手术治疗的全国趋势
Urology. 2017 Oct;108:175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.055. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
4
The Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Frailty in Urologic Practice.定时起立行走测试作为泌尿外科实践中衰弱的一种衡量指标。
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.054. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
Long-term outcomes of primary implantation and revisions of artificial urinary sphincter in men with stress urinary incontinence.压力性尿失禁男性患者人工尿道括约肌初次植入及翻修的长期疗效
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Sep;36(7):1930-1937. doi: 10.1002/nau.23221. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
Patient Function and the Value of Surgical Care for Kidney Cancer.患者功能与肾癌外科治疗的价值。
J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1200-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
7
Frailty and the Role of Obliterative versus Reconstructive Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A National Study.衰弱与盆腔器官脱垂的闭塞性手术与重建性手术的作用:一项全国性研究。
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1502-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
8
Contemporary Review of Artificial Urinary Sphincters for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence.当代人工尿道括约肌治疗男性压力性尿失禁的综述。
Sex Med Rev. 2016 Apr;4(2):157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
9
Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study.男性吊带和人工尿道括约肌失效的风险因素:来自中欧大型队列研究的结果。
Urol Int. 2017;99(1):14-21. doi: 10.1159/000449232. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
10
Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.男性尿道悬吊带术与人工尿道括约肌治疗尿失禁的并发症发生率比较:基于美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的全国多机构分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1571-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1347-3. Epub 2016 Jul 14.