Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (R.K., M.S.L.).
Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (Y.T., P.S.C.).
Circulation. 2019 Jul 30;140(5):370-378. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039048. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is initiated in hospitalized children with bradycardia and poor perfusion. However, their rate of progression to pulseless cardiac arrest despite CPR and the differences in survival compared with initially pulseless arrest are unknown. We examined the prevalence and predictors of survival of children who progress from bradycardia to pulseless in-hospital cardiac arrest despite CPR.
Pediatric patients >30 days and <18 years of age who received CPR at hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation during 2000 to 2016 were included. Each CPR event was classified as bradycardia with pulse, bradycardia with subsequent pulselessness, and initial pulseless cardiac arrest. We assessed risk-adjusted rates of survival to hospital discharge using multilevel Poisson regression models.
Overall, 5592 pediatric patients were treated with CPR, of whom 2799 (50.1%) received CPR for bradycardia with poor perfusion and 2793 (49.9%) for initial pulseless cardiac arrest. Among those with bradycardia, 869 (31.0%, or 15.5% of cohort) became pulseless after a median of 3 minutes of CPR (interquartile range, 1-9 minutes). Rates of survival to discharge were 70.0% (1351 of 1930) for bradycardia with pulse, 30.1% (262 of 869) for bradycardia progressing to pulselessness, and 37.5% (1046 of 2793) for initial pulseless cardiac arrest (P for difference across groups <0.001). Children who became pulseless despite CPR for bradycardia had a 19% lower likelihood (risk ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70, 0.93]; P=0.004) of surviving to hospital discharge than those who were initially pulseless. Among children who progressed to pulselessness despite CPR for bradycardia, a longer interval between CPR and pulselessness was a predictor of lower survival (reference, <2 minutes; for 2-5 minutes, risk ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.41-0.70]; for >5 minutes, risk ratio, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.32-0.53]).
Among hospitalized children in whom CPR is initiated, half have bradycardia with poor perfusion at the initiation of chest compressions, and nearly one-third of these progress to pulseless in-hospital cardiac arrest despite CPR. Survival was significantly lower for children who progress to pulselessness despite CPR compared with those who were initially pulseless. These findings suggest that pediatric patients who lose their pulse despite resuscitation attempts are at particularly high risk and require a renewed focus on postresuscitation care.
心肺复苏(CPR)在住院的心动过缓和灌注不良的患儿中开始进行。然而,尽管进行了 CPR,他们仍会进展为无脉性心脏骤停,并且与最初无脉性骤停相比,其存活率存在差异,这些情况尚不清楚。我们研究了在接受 CPR 的情况下,从心动过缓进展为无脉性院内心脏骤停的患儿的患病率和存活率预测因素。
纳入了 2000 年至 2016 年期间参加 Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation 项目的接受 CPR 的年龄>30 天且<18 岁的儿科患者。每次 CPR 事件均分为有脉搏的心动过缓、随后无脉搏的心动过缓和初始无脉性心脏骤停。我们使用多级泊松回归模型评估调整风险后的出院存活率。
总体而言,有 5592 例儿科患者接受了 CPR 治疗,其中 2799 例(50.1%)因灌注不良性心动过缓接受 CPR,2793 例(49.9%)因初始无脉性心脏骤停接受 CPR。在那些有心动过缓的患者中,869 例(31.0%,或队列的 15.5%)在接受 CPR 中位数为 3 分钟后(四分位距,1-9 分钟)变为无脉。出院存活率分别为:有脉搏的心动过缓为 70.0%(1351/1930),进展为无脉性心动过缓为 30.1%(262/869),初始无脉性心脏骤停为 37.5%(1046/2793)(各组间差异的 P 值<0.001)。尽管对有脉搏的心动过缓进行了 CPR,但无脉搏的患儿存活至出院的可能性降低了 19%(风险比,0.81[95%CI,0.70,0.93];P=0.004)。在因有脉搏的心动过缓而接受 CPR 后进展为无脉性的患儿中,CPR 与无脉性之间的间隔时间较长是存活率较低的预测因素(参考值,<2 分钟;2-5 分钟,风险比,0.54[95%CI,0.41-0.70];>5 分钟,风险比,0.41[95%CI,0.32-0.53])。
在接受 CPR 的住院患儿中,有一半在开始进行胸外按压时患有灌注不良性心动过缓,其中近三分之一尽管进行了 CPR,但仍会进展为无脉性院内心脏骤停。与初始无脉性的患儿相比,尽管进行了 CPR 但仍进展为无脉性的患儿的存活率显著降低。这些发现表明,尽管进行了复苏尝试但仍失去脉搏的儿科患者风险极高,需要重新关注复苏后的护理。