Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424670. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24670.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration is associated with cardiac arrest survival.
To describe characteristics associated with CPR duration among hospitalized children without return of circulation (ROC) (patient-level analysis) and determine whether hospital median CPR duration in patients without ROC is associated with survival (hospital-level analysis).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pediatric in-hospital CPR between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021, used data from the Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. Children receiving chest compressions for at least 2 minutes and/or defibrillation were included in the patient-level analysis. For the hospital-level analysis, sites with at least 20 total events and at least 5 events without ROC were included. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2022, to November 15, 2023.
For the patient-level analysis, the exposure was CPR duration in patients without ROC. For the hospital-level analysis, the exposure was quartile of median CPR duration in events without ROC at each hospital.
For the patient-level analysis, outcomes were patient and event factors, including race and ethnicity and event location; we used a multivariable hierarchical linear regression model to assess factors associated with CPR duration in patients without ROC. For the hospital-level analysis, the main outcome was survival to discharge among all site events; we used a random intercept multivariable hierarchical logistic regression model to examine the association between hospital quartile of CPR duration and survival to discharge.
Of 13 899 events, 3859 patients did not have ROC (median age, 7 months [IQR, 0 months to 7 years]; 2175 boys [56%]). Among event nonsurvivors, median CPR duration was longer in those with initial rhythms of bradycardia with poor perfusion (8.37 [95% CI, 5.70-11.03] minutes; P < .001), pulseless electrical activity (8.22 [95% CI, 5.44-11.00] minutes; P < .001), and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (6.17 [95% CI, 0.09-12.26] minutes; P = .047) (vs asystole). Shorter median CPR duration was associated with neonates compared with older children (-4.86 [95% CI, -8.88 to -0.84] minutes; P = .02), emergency department compared with pediatric intensive car7 e unit location (-4.02 [95% CI, -7.48 to -0.57] minutes; P = .02), and members of racial or ethnic minority groups compared with White patients (-3.67 [95% CI, -6.18 to -1.17]; P = .004). Among all CPR events, the adjusted odds of survival to discharge differed based on hospital quartile of median CPR duration among events without ROC; compared with quartile 1 (15.0-25.9 minutes), the adjusted odds ratio for quartile 2 (26.0-29.4 minutes) was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.36; P < .001); for quartile 3 (29.5-32.9 minutes), 1.23 (95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = .002); and for quartile 4 (33.0-53.0 minutes), 1.04 (95% CI, 0.91-1.19; P = .58).
In this retrospective cohort study of pediatric in-hospital CPR, several factors, including age and event location, were associated with CPR duration in event nonsurvivors. The odds of survival to discharge were lower for patients at hospitals with the shortest and longest median CPR durations among events without ROC. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of CPR during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest and to provide training guidelines for resuscitation teams to eliminate disparities in resuscitation care.
心肺复苏(CPR)持续时间与心脏骤停存活相关。
描述住院儿童无循环恢复(ROC)时 CPR 持续时间的特征(患者水平分析),并确定无 ROC 患者的医院中位数 CPR 持续时间是否与存活率相关(医院水平分析)。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间接受儿科院内 CPR 的患者,数据来自 Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation 注册中心。在患者水平分析中,纳入了接受至少 2 分钟胸外按压和/或除颤的患者。在医院水平分析中,纳入了至少有 20 个总事件和至少 5 个无 ROC 事件的地点。数据分析于 2022 年 12 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 15 日进行。
对于患者水平分析,暴露因素是无 ROC 患者的 CPR 持续时间。对于医院水平分析,暴露因素是每个医院无 ROC 事件中 CPR 中位数持续时间的四分位数。
对于患者水平分析,结果是患者和事件因素,包括种族和民族以及事件地点;我们使用多变量分层线性回归模型评估无 ROC 患者 CPR 持续时间的相关因素。对于医院水平分析,主要结局是所有地点事件的出院存活率;我们使用随机截距多变量分层逻辑回归模型来检查医院 CPR 持续时间四分位数与出院存活率之间的关联。
在 13899 个事件中,3859 名患者没有 ROC(中位年龄,7 个月[四分位距,0 个月至 7 岁];2175 名男孩[56%])。在事件幸存者中,初始节律为心动过缓伴灌注不良(8.37 [95% CI,5.70-11.03] 分钟;P<0.001)、无脉性电活动(8.22 [95% CI,5.44-11.00] 分钟;P<0.001)和无脉性室性心动过速(6.17 [95% CI,0.09-12.26] 分钟;P=0.047)(与心搏停止相比)的 CPR 持续时间较长。与年龄较大的儿童相比,新生儿的 CPR 中位数持续时间较短(-4.86 [95% CI,-8.88 至-0.84] 分钟;P=0.02),与儿科重症监护病房相比,与急诊部的位置相比(-4.02 [95% CI,-7.48 至-0.57] 分钟;P=0.02),与白种人相比,种族或民族少数群体的成员的 CPR 中位数持续时间较短(-3.67 [95% CI,-6.18 至-1.17];P=0.004)。在所有 CPR 事件中,无 ROC 事件中 CPR 中位数持续时间的四分位间距不同,出院存活率的调整比值比也不同;与四分位数 1(15.0-25.9 分钟)相比,四分位数 2(26.0-29.4 分钟)的调整比值比为 1.22(95% CI,1.09-1.36;P<0.001);四分位数 3(29.5-32.9 分钟)为 1.23(95% CI,1.08-1.39;P=0.002);四分位数 4(33.0-53.0 分钟)为 1.04(95% CI,0.91-1.19;P=0.58)。
在这项儿科院内 CPR 的回顾性队列研究中,一些因素,包括年龄和事件位置,与事件幸存者的 CPR 持续时间相关。无 ROC 患者 CPR 中位数持续时间最短和最长的医院的患者出院存活率较低。需要进一步研究以确定儿科院内心脏骤停期间 CPR 的最佳持续时间,并为复苏团队提供培训指南,以消除复苏护理中的差异。