• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西和葡萄牙护理本科生共情与系统思维特征。

Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates.

机构信息

University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

Nursing School of Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):221-229. doi: 10.1177/0969733019833132. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1177/0969733019833132
PMID:31007135
Abstract

AIM

To analyze the empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates.

BACKGROUND

Empathy is a fundamental skill for nursing practice and should be analyzed during the student's education.

METHODS

Descriptive study with cross-sectional design. Participants were 968 undergraduate students, including 215 (22.2%) Brazilians from a university in the state of São Paulo and 753 (77.8%) Portuguese students from a higher education institution in central Portugal. The Portuguese and Brazilian versions of the have good internal consistency and reliability.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

In Brazil, approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing (protocol 191/2016) and in Portugal, from the Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Coimbra Higher School of Nursing (protocol P362-09/2016).

RESULTS

Most (86%) participants were female and aged between 20 and 24 years. In the general profile analysis between both groups, the domains "Social Skills," "Contents," and "Processes" scored higher. Gender differences exist for the feeling of empathy and systemizing, as women scored better on the short version of the and men on the

CONCLUSION

As demonstrated in the domain scores for "Social Skills," "Contents," and "Processes," the undergraduate nursing students analyzed have the ability to deal intuitively and spontaneously with social situations; they are also characterized as methodical people, who like to follow rules, and experience practice better than theory, and the women have a higher empathetic level than men, who in turn are more systemizing.

摘要

目的

分析巴西和葡萄牙护理本科生的共情和系统思维特征。

背景

共情是护理实践的基本技能,应在学生教育期间进行分析。

方法

描述性的、具有横断面设计的研究。参与者包括 968 名本科学生,其中 215 名(22.2%)是来自巴西圣保罗州某大学的学生,753 名(77.8%)是来自葡萄牙中部某高等教育机构的学生。问卷的葡萄牙语和巴西语版本具有良好的内部一致性和可靠性。

伦理考虑

在巴西,该研究得到了圣保罗大学里贝朗普雷托护理学院研究伦理委员会的批准(协议 191/2016),在葡萄牙,得到了健康科学研究单位伦理委员会的批准:护理,科英布拉高等护理学院(协议 P362-09/2016)。

结果

大多数(86%)参与者是女性,年龄在 20 至 24 岁之间。在两组之间的总体特征分析中,“社交技能”“内容”和“过程”这三个领域的得分较高。在共情和系统思维的性别差异方面,女性在共情量表的简短版本上得分较高,而男性在系统思维量表上得分较高。

结论

正如“社交技能”“内容”和“过程”等领域的分数所表明的那样,分析中的护理本科学生具有直观、自发地处理社交情境的能力;他们也被认为是有条理的人,喜欢遵循规则,实践经验优于理论,女性的共情水平高于男性,而男性的系统思维水平更高。

相似文献

1
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates.巴西和葡萄牙护理本科生共情与系统思维特征。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):221-229. doi: 10.1177/0969733019833132. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Semantic validation of the short versions of the Empathy-Systemizing Quotient Scales.共情-系统化商数量表简版的语义效度验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Oct 11;26:e3044. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2606.3044.
3
Empathic profile of nursing freshmen.护理新生的同理心特征。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2298-2305. doi: 10.1177/0969733018780532. Epub 2018 Jul 15.
4
[Individual and gender differences in Empathizing and Systemizing: measurement of individual differences by the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ)].共情与系统化的个体及性别差异:通过共情商数(EQ)和系统化商数(SQ)测量个体差异
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2006 Aug;77(3):271-7. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.77.271.
5
How predictive are sex and empathizing-systemizing cognitive style for entry into the academic areas of social or physical sciences?性别和共情-系统化认知风格对于进入社会科学或自然科学学术领域有多大的预测性?
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0848-z. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
6
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the children's empathy quotient and systemizing quotient: 4-12 years.儿童同理心商数和系统思维商数中文版的心理测量学特性:4-12 岁。
Autism Res. 2022 Sep;15(9):1675-1685. doi: 10.1002/aur.2743. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
More than maths and mindreading: sex differences in empathizing/systemizing covariance.超越数学和读心术:共情/系统化协方差的性别差异。
Autism Res. 2010 Aug;3(4):174-84. doi: 10.1002/aur.143.
8
Do higher dispositions for empathy predispose males toward careers in nursing? A descriptive correlational design.更高的共情倾向会使男性更倾向于从事护理职业吗?一项描述性相关性设计。
Nurs Forum. 2015 Jan-Mar;50(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12058. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
9
Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ).从修订后的系统化商数(SQ-R)和共情商数(EQ)预测自闭症谱系商数(AQ)。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 24;1079(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.012. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
10
Moral foundations in autistic people and people with systemizing minds.自闭症患者和系统思维者的道德基础。
Mol Autism. 2024 May 14;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00591-8.