• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Semantic validation of the short versions of the Empathy-Systemizing Quotient Scales.共情-系统化商数量表简版的语义效度验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Oct 11;26:e3044. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2606.3044.
2
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates.巴西和葡萄牙护理本科生共情与系统思维特征。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):221-229. doi: 10.1177/0969733019833132. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the children's empathy quotient and systemizing quotient: 4-12 years.儿童同理心商数和系统思维商数中文版的心理测量学特性:4-12 岁。
Autism Res. 2022 Sep;15(9):1675-1685. doi: 10.1002/aur.2743. Epub 2022 May 25.
4
Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Farsi Versions of Empathy and Systemizing Quotient: Short Forms.共情与系统化商数波斯语版本简表的因子结构及心理测量特性
Iran J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;13(4):254-263.
5
Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Profession Students.《杰斐逊同理心量表-医疗专业学生中文版的心理测量学特性》。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Dec;20(10):866-73. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12024. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
6
The Empathy and Systemizing Quotient: The Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version and a Review of the Cross-Cultural Stability.共情与系统化商数:荷兰语版本的心理测量特性及跨文化稳定性综述
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Sep;45(9):2848-64. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2448-z.
7
Two versions of perspectives on caring for older patients scale: Translation and psychometric testing among Chinese nursing students.两种观点看待照顾老年患者量表:中文版护理学生的翻译和心理测量学测试。
Nurs Health Sci. 2020 Dec;22(4):903-912. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12745. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
8
Validation of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) - Greek version.《共情量表(EQ)-希腊语版验证》。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):43-50. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.008. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Validation of the Spanish versions of the long (26 items) and short (12 items) forms of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS).《自我关怀量表》(SCS)长(26 项)、短(12 项)式西班牙文版本的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jan 10;12:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-4.
10
Empathy, Autistic Tendencies, and Systemizing Tendencies-Relationships Between Standard Self-Report Measures.同理心、自闭症倾向和系统化倾向——标准自我报告测量之间的关系
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 10;10:307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00307. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
How empathy, perceived parental care, and overprotection indexes are affected by participants' sex: investigating cultural differences.共情、感知到的父母关爱以及过度保护指数如何受到参与者性别的影响:探究文化差异。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Jan 13:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04141-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The moderator effect of sex on attitude toward communication, emotional intelligence, and empathy in the nursing field.性别对护理领域中沟通态度、情商和同理心的调节作用。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Dec 11;25:e2969. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2018.2969.
2
The overlap between autistic spectrum conditions and borderline personality disorder.自闭症谱系障碍与边缘型人格障碍之间的重叠。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0184447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184447. eCollection 2017.
3
Reduced emotional empathy in adults with subclinical ADHD: evidence from the empathy and systemizing quotient.亚临床注意缺陷多动障碍成年人的情感共鸣降低:来自共情与系统化商数的证据
Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2018 Jun;10(2):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s12402-017-0236-7. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
4
The Actions and Feelings Questionnaire in Autism and Typically Developed Adults.自闭症及普通发展成人的行为与情感问卷
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Nov;47(11):3418-3430. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3244-8.
5
Sensory reactivity, empathizing and systemizing in autism spectrum conditions and sensory processing disorder.自闭症谱系障碍和感觉处理障碍中的感觉反应性、共情和系统处理。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jan;29:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
The Empathy and Systemizing Quotient: The Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version and a Review of the Cross-Cultural Stability.共情与系统化商数:荷兰语版本的心理测量特性及跨文化稳定性综述
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Sep;45(9):2848-64. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2448-z.
7
Attenuation of typical sex differences in 800 adults with autism vs. 3,900 controls.800名自闭症成年人与3900名对照者中典型性别差异的减弱。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102251. eCollection 2014.
8
Empathy as a determining factor for nursing career selection.同理心是选择护理职业的决定性因素。
J Nurs Educ. 2013 Apr;52(4):192-7. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130314-02. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
9
Attitudes toward teen mothers among nursing students and psychometric evaluation of Positivity Toward Teen Mothers scale.护理专业学生对青少年母亲的态度及青少年母亲积极态度量表的心理测量学评估。
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Sep;33(9):986-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
10
Reliability and validity of the korean version of the empathy quotient scale.《共情商数量表韩文版的信度和效度》
Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Mar;7(1):24-30. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.1.24. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

共情-系统化商数量表简版的语义效度验证

Semantic validation of the short versions of the Empathy-Systemizing Quotient Scales.

作者信息

Castelhano-Souza Mirella, Mendes Isabel Amélia Costa, Martins José Carlos Amado, Trevizan Maria Auxiliadora, Souza-Júnior Valtuir Duarte, Godoy Simone de

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Oct 11;26:e3044. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2606.3044.

DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.2606.3044
PMID:30328972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6201707/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to perform the semantic validation of the short versions of the Empathy-Systemizing Quotient Scales, intended to measure the empathetic and systemizing profiles of individuals. The scales originated in Cambridge and were validated in Portugal, and were assessed for their psychometric properties.

METHOD

methodological study included the scales' semantic validation (content validity) and verification of their psychometric properties (internal consistency). Five judges participated in the semantic validation. The Content Validity Index was calculated, a pretest was conducted with 18 undergraduate nursing students, and, finally, the scales were applied to a sample.

RESULTS

the sample was composed of 215 undergraduate nursing students, 186 (86.51%) of whom were women aged 21 years old, on average. The scales presented good internal consistency with global Cronbach's alphas equal to 0.83 and 0.79 for the Empathy Quotient and the Systemizing Quotient, respectively. Correlations between the scales and subscales of the Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient were all positive and significant according to the Pearson correlation coefficient.

CONCLUSION

the scales are reliable and valid to measure the empathetic and systemizing profile of undergraduate nursing students and the final version was named "versões curtas das Escalas de Medição do Quociente de Empatia/Sistematização - Brasil" [short versions of the Empathy-Systemizing Quotient Scales - Brazil].

摘要

目的

对共情-系统化商数量表的简短版本进行语义验证,该量表旨在测量个体的共情和系统化特征。这些量表源自剑桥并在葡萄牙进行了验证,同时对其心理测量特性进行了评估。

方法

方法学研究包括量表的语义验证(内容效度)及其心理测量特性的验证(内部一致性)。五名评判员参与了语义验证。计算了内容效度指数,对18名本科护理专业学生进行了预测试,最后将量表应用于一个样本。

结果

样本由215名本科护理专业学生组成,其中186名(86.51%)为女性,平均年龄21岁。量表呈现出良好的内部一致性,共情商数和系统化商数的整体克朗巴哈系数分别为0.83和0.79。根据皮尔逊相关系数,共情商数和系统化商数的量表与子量表之间的相关性均为正且显著。

结论

这些量表对于测量本科护理专业学生的共情和系统化特征是可靠且有效的,最终版本被命名为“巴西共情-系统化商数量表简短版本”。