• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性感染后的成本节约

Cost savings following faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent infection.

作者信息

Dehlholm-Lambertsen Emilie, Hall Bianca K, Jørgensen Simon M D, Jørgensen Christine W, Jensen Mia E, Larsen Sara, Jensen Josephine S, Ehlers Lars, Dahlerup Jens F, Hvas Christian L

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health (SMH), Aalborg University, Denmark.

Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr 10;12:1756284819843002. doi: 10.1177/1756284819843002. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1177/1756284819843002
PMID:31007720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6460887/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrent infection (rCDI) is becoming increasingly common. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective for rCDI, but the costs of an FMT and hospital cost savings related to FMT are unknown. The aim of this study was to calculate the cost of an FMT and the total hospital costs before and after FMT.

METHODS

This was an observational single-centre study, carried out in a public teaching hospital. We included all patients referred for rCDI from January 2014 through December 2015 and documented costs related to donor screening, laboratory processing, and clinical FMT application. We calculated patient-related hospital costs 1 year before FMT (pre-FMT) and 1 year after FMT (post-FMT). Sensitivity analyses were applied to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

We included 50 consecutive adult patients who had a verified diagnosis of rCDI and were referred for FMT. The average cost of an outpatient FMT procedure if donor faeces were applied by colonoscopy was €3,326 per patient and €2,864 if donor faeces were applied using a nasojejunal tube. The total annual pre-FMT hospital costs per patient were €56,415 (95% confidence interval (CI) 41,133-71,697), and these costs dropped by 42% to €32,816 (22,618-42,014) post-FMT ( = 0.004). The main cost driver was hospital admissions. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated cost reductions in all scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

In a public hospital with an implemented FMT service, the average cost of FMT applied by either colonoscopy or nasojejunal tube was €3,095. Total hospital costs dropped by 42% the first year after FMT. The reduction was mainly caused by reductions in the number of hospital admissions and in length of stay.

摘要

背景

复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)正变得越来越常见。粪便微生物群移植(FMT)对rCDI有效,但FMT的成本以及与FMT相关的医院成本节省情况尚不清楚。本研究的目的是计算FMT的成本以及FMT前后的医院总成本。

方法

这是一项在一家公立教学医院进行的单中心观察性研究。我们纳入了2014年1月至2015年12月期间因rCDI转诊的所有患者,并记录了与供体筛查、实验室处理和临床FMT应用相关的成本。我们计算了FMT前1年(FMT前)和FMT后1年(FMT后)与患者相关的医院成本。应用敏感性分析来评估结果的稳健性。

结果

我们纳入了50例经确诊的rCDI成年患者并转诊接受FMT。如果通过结肠镜应用供体粪便,门诊FMT手术的平均成本为每位患者3326欧元;如果使用鼻空肠管应用供体粪便,则为2864欧元。每位患者FMT前的年度医院总成本为56415欧元(95%置信区间(CI)41133 - 71697),FMT后这些成本下降了42%,降至32816欧元(22618 - 42014)(P = 0.004)。主要成本驱动因素是住院。敏感性分析表明在所有情况下成本均降低。

结论

在一家开展FMT服务的公立医院,通过结肠镜或鼻空肠管进行FMT的平均成本为3095欧元。FMT后的第一年医院总成本下降了42%。成本降低主要是由于住院次数和住院时间的减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/b22f6a55985f/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/afada2ea2e3d/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/e3d19e45f28c/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/45a4b3e9ef1d/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/b22f6a55985f/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/afada2ea2e3d/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/e3d19e45f28c/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/45a4b3e9ef1d/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434d/6460887/b22f6a55985f/10.1177_1756284819843002-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost savings following faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent infection.粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性感染后的成本节约
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr 10;12:1756284819843002. doi: 10.1177/1756284819843002. eCollection 2019.
2
Cost Averted With Timely Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Management of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省通过及时进行粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染所避免的成本。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;50(9):747-53. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000494.
3
Systematic review with meta-analysis: encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation - evidence for clinical efficacy.系统评价与荟萃分析:胶囊化粪便微生物群移植——临床疗效证据
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 31;14:17562848211041004. doi: 10.1177/17562848211041004. eCollection 2021.
4
Simple faecal preparation and efficacy of frozen inoculum in faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection--an observational cohort study.简易粪便制备及冷冻菌液在复发性艰难梭菌感染粪便微生物群移植中的疗效——一项观察性队列研究
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jan;41(1):46-53. doi: 10.1111/apt.13009. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌反复感染粪便微生物群移植的成本效益分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;36(4):438-44. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.80.
6
Economic evaluation of Faecal microbiota transplantation compared to antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent infection.粪菌移植与抗生素治疗复发性感染的经济学评估
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 27;24:100420. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100420. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Microbiota dynamics in patients treated with fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.接受粪菌移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染患者的微生物组动态变化。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 26;8(11):e81330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081330. eCollection 2013.
8
Health economic evaluations comparing faecal microbiota transplantation with antibiotics for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review.比较粪便微生物群移植与抗生素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染的卫生经济评估:一项系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00301-7.
9
Encapsulated donor faeces for faecal microbiota transplantation: the Glyprotect protocol.用于粪便微生物群移植的封装供体粪便:Glyprotect方案。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 13;17:17562848241289065. doi: 10.1177/17562848241289065. eCollection 2024.
10
Clinical Efficacy and Microbiome Changes Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Children With Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection.复发性艰难梭菌感染儿童粪便微生物群移植后的临床疗效和微生物组变化
Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 2;9:2622. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02622. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthy lifestyle and life expectancy with and without major chronic disease - a cohort study.有或无主要慢性病情况下的健康生活方式与预期寿命——一项队列研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11093-9.
2
Early Economic Assessment of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients with Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Organisms.多药耐药菌引起的尿路感染患者粪便微生物群移植的早期经济评估
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 May;12(5):1429-1436. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00797-y. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
3
The Regulatory Approach for Faecal Microbiota Transplantation as Treatment for Infection in Italy.

本文引用的文献

1
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Is Superior to Fidaxomicin for Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.粪便微生物移植优于非达霉素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Apr;156(5):1324-1332.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ribotype-guided fecal microbiota transplantation in Chinese patients with severe Clostridium difficile infection.基于核糖体分型的粪便微生物群移植治疗中国重度艰难梭菌感染患者的成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201539. eCollection 2018.
3
Healthcare resource use and attributable cost of Clostridium difficile infection: a micro-costing analysis comparing first and recurrent episodes.
意大利将粪便微生物群移植作为感染治疗方法的监管方法。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 5;11(4):480. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040480.
4
Does Fecal Microbiota Transplant Have a Role in Treating Recurrent Infection in Rural Hospitals?粪便微生物移植在农村医院治疗复发性感染中的作用?
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 9;9:670941. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.670941. eCollection 2021.
5
Health economic evaluations comparing faecal microbiota transplantation with antibiotics for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review.比较粪便微生物群移植与抗生素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染的卫生经济评估:一项系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00301-7.
6
Determinants of community members' willingness to donate stool for faecal microbiota transplantation.社区成员捐赠粪便用于粪便微生物群移植的意愿的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0243751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243751. eCollection 2020.
7
Treatment of Recurrent Infection Using Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Iranian Patients with Underlying Inflammatory Bowel Disease.粪便微生物群移植治疗伊朗潜在炎症性肠病患者的复发性感染
J Inflamm Res. 2020 Sep 18;13:563-570. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S265520. eCollection 2020.
8
Faecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridioides difficile infection: real-life experience from an academic Italian hospital.艰难梭菌感染中的粪便微生物群移植:来自一家意大利学术医院的真实经验。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 29;13:1756284820934315. doi: 10.1177/1756284820934315. eCollection 2020.
9
Stool for fecal microbiota transplantation should be classified as a transplant product and not as a drug.用于粪便微生物群移植的粪便应归类为移植产品,而非药物。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Dec;7(10):1408-1410. doi: 10.1177/2050640619887579. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
艰难梭菌感染的医疗资源利用和可归因成本:比较首次和复发性发作的微观成本分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Oct 1;73(10):2851-2855. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky250.
4
Recruitment of feces donors among blood donors: Results from an observational cohort study.招募献血者作为粪便供者:一项观察性队列研究的结果。
Gut Microbes. 2018 Nov 2;9(6):540-550. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2018.1458179. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA)2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):987-994. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy149.
6
Update of treatment algorithms for Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染治疗方案的更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):452-462. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
7
Extended Screening Costs Associated With Selecting Donors for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome-Associated Diseases.为治疗代谢综合征相关疾病选择粪便微生物群移植供体所产生的额外筛查成本。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 6;4(4):ofx243. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx243. eCollection 2017 Fall.
8
The long-term effects of faecal microbiota transplantation for gastrointestinal symptoms and general health in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.复发性艰难梭菌感染患者接受粪便微生物群移植治疗胃肠道症状和整体健康的长期效果。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;47(3):371-379. doi: 10.1111/apt.14443. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection: A Literature Review.粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染的成本效益:一项文献综述
Cureus. 2017 Aug 23;9(8):e1599. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1599.
10
Faecal microbiota transplantation: establishment of a clinical application framework.粪便微生物群移植:临床应用框架的建立
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;29(11):e36-e45. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000958.