Suppr超能文献

急诊科尿培养随访中抗生素选择的优化:一项干预前后的回顾性研究——临床药师的努力

Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts.

作者信息

Almulhim Abdulaziz Saleh, Aldayyen Ali, Yenina Kateryna, Chiappini Adam, Khan Tahir Mehmood

机构信息

1King Faisal University, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

2The University of Arizona, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019 Apr 9;12:8. doi: 10.1186/s40545-019-0168-z. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are commonly encountered in the emergency department (ED). ED culture follow up is an important tool to provide the appropriate therapy after the identification of the causative pathogen. There is a growing body of evidence for the positive role of pharmacists in following up the ED cultures. The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacist driven urine culture follow ups to the nurse-practitioner (NP) driven follow ups in term of the appropriateness of antibiotic selections in patients with resistant isolates, inappropriately treated asymptomatic bacteriuria, and inappropriately chosen antibiotic.

METHODOLOGY

This was a retrospective pre-post intervention study divided into a two group period to compare pharmacist to NP led ED culture follow up interventions. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used for analysis. Student's -test was used for continuous variables and Chi-square test/or fisher's-exact test when appropriate were used for the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (25.7%) and 102 (34%) met the inclusion criteria in the pharmacist arm and in the NP arm, respectively. was the most commonly isolated pathogen in both arms. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was often treated in the ED in both groups (45/157, 28.7%) and there were no efforts in discontinuation of antibiotics in these patients. Neither the interventions group nor the no interventions groups were statistically different between the pharmacist and NP arms ( 0.0778), ( 0.797), respectively.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant difference was observed between pharmacist driven monitoring and NP driven monitoring. In our institution, asymptomatic bacteriuria was commonly treated even in the absence of indications. We recommend that Pharmacists' roles in the ED cultures follow up be expanded to include antibiotic discontinuation in patients who meet asymptomatic bacteriuria criteria or have confirmed negative urine culture.

摘要

引言

尿路感染(UTI)在急诊科(ED)很常见。急诊培养随访是在确定致病病原体后提供适当治疗的重要工具。越来越多的证据表明药剂师在随访急诊培养方面发挥着积极作用。本研究的目的是比较药剂师主导的尿培养随访与护士执业医师(NP)主导的随访在耐药菌株患者抗生素选择的适宜性、无症状菌尿治疗不当以及抗生素选择不当方面的情况。

方法

这是一项回顾性干预前后研究,分为两个阶段,以比较药剂师与NP主导的急诊培养随访干预。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)20版进行分析。连续变量采用学生t检验,主要结局在适当情况下采用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验。

结果

药剂师组和NP组分别有55例(25.7%)和102例(34%)患者符合纳入标准。 是两组中最常见的分离病原体。两组在急诊科无症状菌尿的治疗都很常见(45/157,28.7%),且这些患者未采取停用抗生素的措施。药剂师组和NP组的干预组与非干预组之间在统计学上均无差异(分别为 0.0778, 0.797)。

结论

药剂师主导的监测与NP主导的监测之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。在我们机构,即使没有指征,无症状菌尿也普遍得到治疗。我们建议扩大药剂师在急诊培养随访中的作用,包括对符合无症状菌尿标准或尿培养已确认阴性的患者停用抗生素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b724/6454615/fd599117097b/40545_2019_168_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验