Benson Michelle, Dewey Mark, Friesner Daniel
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Jul-Aug;63(4S):S39-S42.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.08.019. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common indication for antibiotic prescriptions in the outpatient setting. With rising antimicrobial resistance, eliminating unnecessary antibiotics is critical. Previous research has shown that pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship in the emergency department (ED) setting can reduce the number of unnecessary antibiotics and increase appropriate antibiotic prescribing. By expanding the scope of ED pharmacists to include antimicrobial stewardship initiatives, rural EDs can better justify pharmacy involvement in the ED.
To determine whether pharmacist review of urine cultures in a rural ED leads to an improvement in antimicrobial stewardship outcomes.
This was a hybrid, quality improvement study conducted in a 12-bed, rural hospital ED. Data were collected from October 15, 2021, through April 15, 2022, 3 months before (preintervention) and after (postintervention) pharmacists assumed the responsibility for reviewing ED urine cultures from the nursing staff. For each urine culture, a pharmacist conducted a patient chart review and determined whether an intervention was required. If action was required, the pharmacist provided a recommendation to an ED provider and subsequently implemented the agreed on action. Primary study outcomes included (1) the number of discontinued antibiotics when there was no bacterial infection cultured and (2) when changing antibiotics on the basis of culture results, whether the antibiotic chosen matched current guidelines. Primary postintervention outcomes were compared with preintervention ones using the Fisher exact tests.
Pharmacist review in the postintervention period led to a statistically significant higher number of discontinued antibiotics than in the preintervention period (20/65 vs. 0/71, P < 0.001). The antibiotics chosen when altering therapy on the basis of culture results did not differ statistically significant between the pre- and postintervention periods (P > 0.999).
Pharmacist review of urine cultures in a rural ED can improve antimicrobial stewardship outcomes by decreasing unnecessary antibiotic use for the treatment of UTIs.
尿路感染(UTIs)是门诊抗生素处方的常见指征。随着抗菌药物耐药性的上升,消除不必要的抗生素使用至关重要。先前的研究表明,在急诊科(ED)由药剂师主导的抗菌药物管理可以减少不必要的抗生素使用,并增加合理的抗生素处方。通过扩大急诊科药剂师的职责范围,将抗菌药物管理举措纳入其中,农村急诊科可以更好地证明药剂师参与急诊科工作的合理性。
确定农村急诊科药剂师对尿培养结果的审核是否能改善抗菌药物管理效果。
这是一项在一家拥有12张床位的农村医院急诊科进行的混合质量改进研究。数据收集时间为2021年10月15日至2022年4月15日,即药剂师从护理人员手中接过审核急诊科尿培养结果的职责之前(干预前)和之后(干预后)各3个月。对于每份尿培养结果,药剂师进行患者病历审查,并确定是否需要进行干预。如果需要采取行动,药剂师会向急诊科医生提供建议,并随后实施商定的行动。主要研究结果包括:(1)培养未发现细菌感染时停用抗生素的数量;(2)根据培养结果更换抗生素时,所选抗生素是否符合当前指南。干预后的主要结果与干预前的结果采用Fisher精确检验进行比较。
与干预前相比,干预后期药剂师审核导致停用抗生素的数量在统计学上显著增加(20/65 vs. 0/71,P < 0.001)。根据培养结果调整治疗方案时所选的抗生素在干预前后无统计学显著差异(P > 0.999)。
农村急诊科药剂师对尿培养结果的审核可通过减少治疗尿路感染时不必要的抗生素使用来改善抗菌药物管理效果。