Langhammer Birgitta, Sunnerhagen Katharina S, Stanghelle Johan K, Sällström Susanne, Becker Frank, Fugl-Meyer Kerstin
Faculty of Health, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo and Akershus University College, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Jun;2(2):154-162. doi: 10.1177/2396987317695140. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
The overall aim of the present study was to explore perceived life satisfaction in persons with stroke, from admission to specialised rehabilitation until follow up 1 year post-discharge. The secondary aim was to evaluate possible external and internal explanatory factors for perceived life satisfaction.
A prospective, descriptive study of specialised rehabilitation of persons with stroke. Persons with a primary diagnosis of stroke were enrolled in the study.
Overall, total score on LiSat-11 showed that life was perceived as satisfying by 11% on admission, 21% at discharge, 25% at 6 and 31% at 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation, reported by 230 participating persons with stroke. Repeated measurement indicated significant differences of total life satisfaction between clinics, also when controlled for disability and severity. The items "sexual life," "health," and "vocational life"/"financial" were most dissatisfying at the various reported time points. The linear regression analysis revealed an equal amount of internal and external explanatory factors at the different time points, explaining between 16% and 41% of the variations.
The perceived life satisfaction was reported as low/dissatisfying at the four stated time points in all the participating clinics. Four items were especially vulnerable post-stroke: vocational situation, sexual life, physical health and mental health. Both internal and external factors contributed to life satisfaction, such as gender, severity of stroke, marital status, country, models of rehabilitation, occupational status, length of stay (LOS), number of therapies and hours in therapy. However, there were significant differences between clinics, indicating that unidentified factors may also influence life satisfaction.
本研究的总体目标是探讨中风患者从入院到接受专科康复治疗直至出院后1年随访期间的生活满意度。次要目标是评估生活满意度可能的外部和内部解释因素。
一项关于中风患者专科康复的前瞻性描述性研究。纳入主要诊断为中风的患者。
总体而言,230名参与研究的中风患者报告,LiSat-11总分显示,入院时11%的患者认为生活令人满意,出院时为21%,康复出院后6个月时为25%,12个月时为31%。重复测量表明,即使在控制了残疾和严重程度后,各诊所之间的总体生活满意度仍存在显著差异。在各个报告时间点,“性生活”“健康”和“职业生活/财务状况”项目最令人不满意。线性回归分析显示,在不同时间点,内部和外部解释因素的数量相等,解释了16%至41%的差异。
在所有参与诊所的四个指定时间点,生活满意度均被报告为低/不满意。中风后有四个项目特别脆弱:职业状况、性生活、身体健康和心理健康。内部和外部因素都对生活满意度有影响,如性别、中风严重程度、婚姻状况、国家、康复模式、职业状况、住院时间、治疗次数和治疗时长。然而,各诊所之间存在显著差异,表明可能还有未明确的因素也会影响生活满意度。