de Andrés-Nogales Fernando, Álvarez María, de Miquel María Ángeles, Segura Tomás, Gil Alberto, Cardona Pere, Casado Miguel Ángel, Nogueira Raul G, Dávalos Antoni
Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.
Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Medtronic Ibérica, S.A., Madrid, Spain.
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Sep;2(3):272-284. doi: 10.1177/2396987317721865. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of stent-retriever mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator compared with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions in Spain.
Clinical data were taken from the SWIFT PRIME clinical trial. A lifetime Markov state transition model defined by the modified Rankin Scale score was developed to estimate costs and health outcomes (life years gained and quality adjusted life years). A Spanish National Health System perspective (direct medical costs) was considered. Resource utilisation and utilities were obtained from available published data and endorsed by an expert panel. Costs (€, 2016) were obtained from various Spanish sources. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator was associated with better outcomes (1.17 life years gained and 2.51 quality adjusted life years) and savings of €44,378, resulting in a dominant therapy over intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone. A net monetary benefit of €119,744 was obtained considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/quality adjusted life year gained. The combined therapy was also dominant in all sensitivity analyses, deterministic and probabilistic.
The results were consistent with a previously published cost-effectiveness analysis and reinforce the likeliness of the selection of stent-retriever mechanical thrombectomy plus intravenous tissue plasminogen activator over intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone.
Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator is a dominant alternative over intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone (more effective and less costly) for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions in the Spanish setting.
评估在西班牙,对于因大血管闭塞导致急性缺血性卒中的患者,与单纯静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂相比,支架取栓机械血栓切除术联合静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的成本效益。
临床数据取自SWIFT PRIME临床试验。开发了一个由改良Rankin量表评分定义的终身马尔可夫状态转换模型,以估计成本和健康结果(获得的生命年数和质量调整生命年数)。考虑了西班牙国家卫生系统的视角(直接医疗成本)。资源利用和效用数据来自已发表的可用数据,并得到专家小组认可。成本(2016年欧元)来自西班牙的各种来源。进行了确定性和概率性敏感性分析。
静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂后行支架取栓术与更好的结果相关(获得1.17个生命年和2.51个质量调整生命年),节省44378欧元,从而成为优于单纯静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的主导治疗方法。考虑到每获得一个质量调整生命年的支付意愿阈值为30000欧元,获得了119744欧元的净货币效益。在所有确定性和概率性敏感性分析中,联合治疗也占主导地位。
结果与先前发表的成本效益分析一致,进一步证明了选择支架取栓机械血栓切除术联合静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂而非单纯静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的可能性。
在西班牙,对于治疗因大血管闭塞导致急性缺血性卒中的患者,静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂后行支架取栓术是优于单纯静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的主导选择(更有效且成本更低)。