• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国急性缺血性卒中6小时内机械取栓术的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy within 6 hours of acute ischaemic stroke in China.

作者信息

Pan Yuesong, Cai Xueli, Huo Xiaochuan, Zhao Xingquan, Liu Liping, Wang Yongjun, Miao Zhongrong, Wang Yilong

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

China National Clinical Research Centre for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 22;8(2):e018951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018951.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018951
PMID:29472264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5855394/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is an effective but expensive therapy for acute ischaemic stroke with proximal anterior circulation occlusion. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy in China, which is the largest developing country.

DESIGN

A combination of decision tree and Markov model was developed. Outcome and cost data were derived from the published literature and claims database. The efficacy data were derived from the meta-analyses of nine trials. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed in order to assess the uncertainty of the results.

SETTING

Hospitals in China.

PARTICIPANTS

The patients with acute ischaemic stroke caused by proximal anterior circulation occlusion within 6 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

Mechanical thrombectomy within 6 hours with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment within 4.5 hours versus intravenous tPA treatment alone.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The benefit conferred by the treatment was assessed by estimating the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained in the long term (30 years).

RESULTS

The addition of mechanical thrombectomy to intravenous tPA treatment compared with standard treatment alone yielded a lifetime gain of 0.794 QALYs at an additional cost of CNY 50 000 (US$7700), resulting in a cost of CNY 63 010 (US$9690) per QALY gained. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that mechanical thrombectomy was cost-effective in 99.9% of the simulation runs at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CNY 125 700 (US$19 300) per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke caused by proximal anterior circulation occlusion within 6 hours was cost-effective in China. The data may be used as a reference with regard to medical resources allocation for stroke treatment in low-income and middle-income countries as well as in the remote areas in the developed countries.

摘要

目的

血管内机械取栓术是治疗伴有近端前循环闭塞的急性缺血性卒中的一种有效但昂贵的疗法。本研究旨在确定在中国这个最大的发展中国家,机械取栓术的成本效益。

设计

构建决策树和马尔可夫模型相结合的模型。结局和成本数据来源于已发表的文献和索赔数据库。疗效数据来源于9项试验的荟萃分析。进行单向和概率敏感性分析以评估结果的不确定性。

地点

中国的医院。

参与者

6小时内由近端前循环闭塞导致急性缺血性卒中的患者。

干预措施

6小时内行机械取栓术并在4.5小时内行静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)治疗,与单纯静脉注射tPA治疗对比。

结局指标

通过估算长期(30年)每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本来评估治疗带来的益处。

结果

与单纯标准治疗相比,在静脉注射tPA治疗基础上加用机械取栓术可使终生获得0.794个QALY,额外成本为50000元人民币(7700美元),即每获得一个QALY的成本为63010元人民币(9690美元)。概率敏感性分析表明,在支付意愿阈值为每QALY 125700元人民币(19300美元)时,机械取栓术在99.9%的模拟运行中具有成本效益。

结论

在中国,6小时内对由近端前循环闭塞导致的急性缺血性卒中进行机械取栓术具有成本效益。这些数据可作为低收入和中等收入国家以及发达国家偏远地区卒中治疗医疗资源分配的参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9264/5855394/02423fce0c76/bmjopen-2017-018951f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9264/5855394/e810dccfbb34/bmjopen-2017-018951f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9264/5855394/431e2fcb4e3a/bmjopen-2017-018951f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9264/5855394/02423fce0c76/bmjopen-2017-018951f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9264/5855394/e810dccfbb34/bmjopen-2017-018951f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9264/5855394/431e2fcb4e3a/bmjopen-2017-018951f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9264/5855394/02423fce0c76/bmjopen-2017-018951f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy within 6 hours of acute ischaemic stroke in China.中国急性缺血性卒中6小时内机械取栓术的成本效益
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 22;8(2):e018951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018951.
2
Cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke in China.中国急性缺血性卒中发病4.5小时内溶栓治疗的成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 20;9(10):e110525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110525. eCollection 2014.
3
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct in China.中国急性大面积脑梗死血管内治疗的成本效果分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Apr 23;16(5):453-458. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020466.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy plus tissue-type plasminogen activator compared with tissue-type plasminogen activator alone for acute ischemic stroke in France.法国急性缺血性脑卒中采用机械取栓联合组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与单独使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的成本效果分析。
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2019 Apr;175(4):252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.06.007. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Health Technology Assessment.急性缺血性中风患者的机械取栓术:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Feb 8;16(4):1-79. eCollection 2016.
6
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy with alteplase versus endovascular thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion.血管内溶栓联合阿替普酶与单纯血管内取栓治疗大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效果分析。
CMAJ Open. 2023 May 16;11(3):E443-E450. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220096. Print 2023 May-Jun.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Intra-Arterial Treatment as an Adjunct to Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke.动脉内治疗作为静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂辅助治疗急性缺血性卒中的成本效益
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):1870-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009779. Epub 2015 May 26.
8
Cost-effectiveness of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke with unknown time of onset: a Markov modelling analysis from the Chinese and US perspectives.重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗发病时间不明的急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效果分析:来自中国和美国的 Markov 模型分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e065133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065133.
9
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator compared with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in Spain.在西班牙,与单独使用静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂相比,静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂后使用支架取栓器进行机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中的成本效益。
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Sep;2(3):272-284. doi: 10.1177/2396987317721865. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
10
Long-term cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke in real life: An analysis based on data from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke).真实世界中急性缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗的长期成本效益:基于瑞典脑卒中注册登记(Riksstroke)数据的分析。
Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(8):802-814. doi: 10.1177/1747493017701154. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Tenecteplase for ischemic stroke at 4.5 to 24 hours without thrombectomy: a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.替奈普酶用于4.5至24小时无血栓切除术的缺血性卒中:中国医疗保健系统视角下的成本效用分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 10;16:1551332. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1551332. eCollection 2025.
2
The economic impact associated with stent retriever selection for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis of MASTRO I data from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.支架取栓术选择治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的经济影响:基于中国医疗体系视角下 MASTRO I 数据的成本效果分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Nov;13(11):e240160. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0160. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator compared with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in Spain.在西班牙,与单独使用静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂相比,静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂后使用支架取栓器进行机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中的成本效益。
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Sep;2(3):272-284. doi: 10.1177/2396987317721865. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
2
New era of stroke therapy and new challenges.中风治疗的新时代与新挑战。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016 Feb 16;1(1):6-7. doi: 10.1136/svn-2016-000010. eCollection 2016 Mar.
3
Extending mechanical thrombectomy service provision to 24/7: a break-even analysis.
将机械取栓服务提供时间延长至全天候24小时:收支平衡分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11290-8.
4
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in China: evidence from Shandong Peninsula.中国急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的成本效益:来自山东半岛的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jun 5;14(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00513-7.
5
Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective.依达拉奉右莰醇与丁苯酞治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的成本-效果分析:基于中国医疗保健视角。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 12;24(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17959-3.
6
Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus human urinary kallidinogenase for acute ischemic stroke in China.依达拉奉右莰醇与注射用尤瑞克林在中国急性缺血性脑卒中治疗中的成本效益分析
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00479-6.
7
Economic evaluation of stent retrievers in basilar artery occlusion: An analysis from Chinese healthcare system perspective.支架取栓器在基底动脉闭塞中的经济学评价:基于中国医疗体系视角的分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294929. eCollection 2023.
8
Endovascular treatment for basilar artery occlusion: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a meta-analysis.基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗:基于荟萃分析的成本效益分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 20;14:1267554. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1267554. eCollection 2023.
9
Optimizing Stroke Care for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusions: Current State of the Art and Future Directions.优化大血管闭塞患者的卒中治疗:当前技术水平与未来方向
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2020;14(6):203-214. doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2020-0024. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
10
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy with alteplase versus endovascular thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion.血管内溶栓联合阿替普酶与单纯血管内取栓治疗大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效果分析。
CMAJ Open. 2023 May 16;11(3):E443-E450. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220096. Print 2023 May-Jun.
Endovascular therapy for Acute ischemic Stroke Trial (EAST): study protocol for a prospective, multicentre control trial in China.
急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗试验(EAST):在中国进行的前瞻性、多中心对照试验的研究方案。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016 Jun 24;1(2):44-51. doi: 10.1136/svn-2016-000022. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Long-term cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke in real life: An analysis based on data from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke).真实世界中急性缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗的长期成本效益:基于瑞典脑卒中注册登记(Riksstroke)数据的分析。
Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(8):802-814. doi: 10.1177/1747493017701154. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Endovascular thrombectomy and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in acute stroke: A randomized care trial.急性卒中血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗联合与单纯药物治疗的随机对照试验。
J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;44(3):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.01.126. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Solitaire Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results From the SWIFT-PRIME Trial (Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke).Solitaire支架取栓术治疗急性缺血性卒中的成本效益:SWIFT-PRIME试验(以取栓术为急性缺血性卒中主要血管内治疗手段的Solitaire)结果
Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):379-387. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014735. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Stroke Therapy: A Patient Subgroup Analysis From a US Healthcare Perspective.血管内卒中治疗的成本效益:从美国医疗保健视角进行的患者亚组分析
Stroke. 2016 Nov;47(11):2797-2804. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014147. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
8
Endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: the Pragmatic Ischaemic Stroke Thrombectomy Evaluation (PISTE) randomised, controlled trial.急性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗:实用缺血性卒中血栓切除术评估(PISTE)随机对照试验。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;88(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314117. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial.机械取栓联合静脉溶栓与单纯静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的随机对照研究(THRACE)
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Oct;15(11):1138-47. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Aspiration Thrombectomy After Intravenous Alteplase Versus Intravenous Alteplase Alone.静脉注射阿替普酶后进行抽吸血栓切除术与单纯静脉注射阿替普酶的比较。
Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2331-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013372. Epub 2016 Aug 2.