• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英国国民保健制度中提供机械血栓切除术的成本:一项微观成本研究。

The cost of providing mechanical thrombectomy in the UK NHS: a micro-costing study.

机构信息

Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford, UK and Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK

Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):e40-e45. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0413.

DOI:10.7861/clinmed.2019-0413
PMID:32414740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7354051/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke is well established, but uncertainty remains around the true cost of delivering this treatment within the NHS. The aim of this study was to establish the cost of providing MT within the hyperacute phase of care and to explore differences in resources used and costs across different neuroscience centres in the UK.

METHOD

This was a multicentre retrospective study using micro-costing methods to enable a precise assessment of the costs of MT from an NHS perspective. Data on resources used and their costs were collected from five UK neuroscience centres between 2015 and 2018.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 310 patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated with MT. The mean total cost of providing MT and inpatient care within 24 hours was £10,846 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10,527-11,165) per patient. The main driver of cost was MT procedure costs, accounting for 73% (£7,943; 95% CI 7,649-8,237) of the total 24-hour cost. Costs were higher for patients treated under general anaesthesia (£11,048; standard deviation (SD) 2,654) than for local anaesthesia (£9,978; SD 2,654), mean difference £1,070 (95% CI 381-1,759; p=0.003); admission to an intensive care unit (ICU; £12,212; SD 3,028) against for admission elsewhere (£10,179; SD 2,415), mean difference £2,032 (95% CI 1,345-2,719; p<0001).The mean cost within 72 hours was £12,440 (95% CI 10,628-14,252). The total costs for the duration of inpatient care before discharge from a thrombectomy centre was £14,362 (95% CI 13,603-15,122).

CONCLUSIONS

Major factors contributing to costs of MT for stroke include consumables and staff for intervention, use of general anaesthesia and ICU admissions. These findings can inform the reimbursement, provision and strategic planning of stroke services and aid future economic evaluations.

摘要

介绍

机械取栓(MT)治疗大血管闭塞性卒中的临床疗效和成本效益已得到充分证实,但在 NHS 内提供这种治疗的真实成本仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在确定在超急性期内提供 MT 的成本,并探讨英国不同神经科学中心之间资源使用和成本的差异。

方法

这是一项多中心回顾性研究,采用微观成本法准确评估 NHS 视角下 MT 的成本。2015 年至 2018 年间,从英国的五家神经科学中心收集了 310 名接受 MT 治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的数据。使用资源及其成本的数据。

结果

共收集了 310 例接受 MT 治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的数据。每例患者在 24 小时内提供 MT 和住院治疗的平均总成本为 10846 英镑(95%置信区间[CI] 10527-11165)。成本的主要驱动因素是 MT 手术成本,占 24 小时总成本的 73%(7943 英镑;95%CI 7649-8237)。全身麻醉(11048 英镑;标准差[SD] 2654)比局部麻醉(9978 英镑;SD 2654)的患者成本更高,平均差异为 1070 英镑(95%CI 381-1759;p=0.003);入住重症监护病房(ICU;12212 英镑;SD 3028)与入住其他病房(10179 英镑;SD 2415)的患者相比,平均差异为 2032 英镑(95%CI 1345-2719;p<0001)。72 小时内的平均费用为 12440 英镑(95%CI 10628-14252)。从血栓切除术中心出院前住院治疗的总费用为 14362 英镑(95%CI 13603-15122)。

结论

导致 MT 治疗卒中成本的主要因素包括干预的耗材和人员、全身麻醉的使用以及 ICU 入院。这些发现可以为卒中服务的报销、提供和战略规划提供信息,并有助于未来的经济评估。

相似文献

1
The cost of providing mechanical thrombectomy in the UK NHS: a micro-costing study.在英国国民保健制度中提供机械血栓切除术的成本:一项微观成本研究。
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):e40-e45. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0413.
2
3
Hub-and-spoke model for thrombectomy service in UK NHS practice.英国国民保健制度实践中的取栓服务的轮辐式模型。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Jan;21(1):e26-e31. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0579.
4
Cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy alone versus alteplase before thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results from the DIRECT-MT.直接机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:单纯取栓与取栓前溶栓的成本效果分析——DIRECT-MT 研究结果
J Neurosurg. 2023 Feb 10;139(3):678-686. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS221791. Print 2023 Sep 1.
5
Extending mechanical thrombectomy service provision to 24/7: a break-even analysis.将机械取栓服务提供时间延长至全天候24小时:收支平衡分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11290-8.
6
Thrombectomy is a cost-saving procedure up to 24 h after onset.血栓切除术在发病后24小时内是一种节省成本的治疗方法。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2022 Feb;122(1):163-171. doi: 10.1007/s13760-021-01810-2. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy plus tissue-type plasminogen activator compared with tissue-type plasminogen activator alone for acute ischemic stroke in France.法国急性缺血性脑卒中采用机械取栓联合组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与单独使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的成本效果分析。
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2019 Apr;175(4):252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.06.007. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
8
Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Mechanical Thrombectomy Beyond 6 Hours Following Advanced Imaging in the United Kingdom.在英国,利用先进影像学检查后超过 6 小时进行机械取栓的成本效益研究。
Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3220-3227. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026816. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: an Australian payer perspective.急性缺血性中风机械取栓术的成本效益:澳大利亚医保支付方视角
J Med Econ. 2018 Aug;21(8):799-809. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1474746. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Mechanical thrombectomy in COVID-19-associated ischaemic stroke: patient characteristics and outcomes in a single-centre study.2019冠状病毒病相关缺血性卒中的机械取栓术:一项单中心研究中的患者特征与结局
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2022;56(2):163-170. doi: 10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0026. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Africa: A Challenging Future.非洲的机械血栓切除术:充满挑战的未来。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 25;16(12):e76365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76365. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The costs associated with stroke care continuum: a systematic review.与卒中护理连续体相关的成本:一项系统综述。
Health Econ Rev. 2023 May 17;13(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00439-6.
3
How a thrombectomy service can reduce hospital deficit: a cost-effectiveness study.血栓切除术服务如何减少医院赤字:一项成本效益研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Nov 4;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00395-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy stent retrievers and aspiration devices in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.动脉内机械取栓支架取栓器和抽吸装置治疗急性缺血性卒中:一项采用试验序贯分析的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Dec;2(4):308-318. doi: 10.1177/2396987317719362. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
2
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator compared with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in Spain.在西班牙,与单独使用静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂相比,静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂后使用支架取栓器进行机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中的成本效益。
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Sep;2(3):272-284. doi: 10.1177/2396987317721865. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
3
The economic burden of stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: Using a national stroke register to estimate and report patient-level health economic outcomes in stroke.英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰中风护理的经济负担:利用国家中风登记册评估和报告中风患者层面的健康经济结果。
Eur Stroke J. 2018 Mar;3(1):82-91. doi: 10.1177/2396987317746516. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
4
Estimating the number of UK stroke patients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy.估算英国适合进行血管内血栓切除术的中风患者数量。
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Dec;2(4):319-326. doi: 10.1177/2396987317733343. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
5
A systematic review of economic evaluations on stent-retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.支架取栓术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的经济学评价的系统评价。
J Neurol. 2018 Jul;265(7):1511-1520. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8760-8. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
[Analysis of the direct costs associated with mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous fibrinolysis in the Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias].[阿斯图里亚斯中央大学医院机械取栓术和静脉溶栓相关直接成本分析]
Rev Neurol. 2018 Jan 1;66(1):7-14.
7
Systematic Review of the Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Rapid Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的成本及成本效益的系统评价
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2519-2526. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017199. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Long-term cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke in real life: An analysis based on data from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke).真实世界中急性缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗的长期成本效益:基于瑞典脑卒中注册登记(Riksstroke)数据的分析。
Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(8):802-814. doi: 10.1177/1747493017701154. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial.机械取栓联合静脉溶栓与单纯静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的随机对照研究(THRACE)
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Oct;15(11):1138-47. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Cost-effectiveness of stent-retriever thrombectomy in combination with IV t-PA compared with IV t-PA alone for acute ischemic stroke in the UK.在英国,与单纯静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(IV t-PA)相比,支架取栓术联合IV t-PA治疗急性缺血性卒中的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):785-94. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1174868. Epub 2016 Apr 21.