You Ann Hee, Kim Ji Young, Kim Do-Hyeong, Suh Jiwoo, Han Dong Woo
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e15132. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015132.
Older people are more vulnerable to hemodynamic instability caused by propofol due to their decreased initial distribution volume and increased sensitivity to propofol. Midazolam or remifentanil can often be coadministered because of their synergistic or additive effects with propofol as well as amnesic properties and the blockade of sympathetic stimulation. However, no study has confirmed the appropriate dose of propofol for loss of consciousness in aged patients when administered with other drugs, including opioids or benzodiazepines.
Patients >65 years scheduled for general anesthesia were enrolled. The patients were randomized into 3 groups using a computer-generated randomization table. Patients in group P (propofol) received only propofol for loss of consciousness, those in group PR (propofol-remifentanil) received remifentanil before propofol, and those in group PMR (propofol-midazolam-remifentanil) received remifentanil and midazolam before propofol. After propofol administration, loss of both eyelash reflex and verbal response represented success. The 95% effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness in each group, which was the primary outcome, was determined using a modified biased coin up-and-down method.
In total, 120 patients were randomized into the 3 groups (n = 40). The 95% effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness was 1.13, 0.87, and 0.72 mg/kg in groups P, PR, and PMR, respectively. The mean blood pressure (MBP) in group PMR was more significantly decreased before propofol injection (P = .041) as well as 2 minutes (P = .005) and 3 minutes after propofol administration (P<.001), compared with group P, but there were no intergroup differences at other time points.
The effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness in elderly patients could be decreased by 23% and 36% when remifentanil pretreatment was used without and with midazolam, respectively. However, the decrease in MBP was greater with remifentanil and midazolam pretreatment than with propofol alone. These findings suggest that pretreatment with midazolam for propofol infusions with remifentanil in elderly patients should be cautiously used, due to hemodynamic instability during induction.
老年人由于初始分布容积减小以及对丙泊酚的敏感性增加,更容易受到丙泊酚引起的血流动力学不稳定的影响。咪达唑仑或瑞芬太尼常因其与丙泊酚的协同或相加作用以及遗忘特性和对交感神经刺激的阻滞作用而联合使用。然而,尚无研究证实老年患者在与其他药物(包括阿片类药物或苯二氮䓬类药物)合用时,用于意识消失的丙泊酚合适剂量。
纳入计划接受全身麻醉的65岁以上患者。使用计算机生成的随机化表将患者随机分为3组。P组(丙泊酚组)仅使用丙泊酚诱导意识消失,PR组(丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼组)在丙泊酚前给予瑞芬太尼,PMR组(丙泊酚-咪达唑仑-瑞芬太尼组)在丙泊酚前给予瑞芬太尼和咪达唑仑。给予丙泊酚后,睫毛反射和言语反应均消失表示成功。采用改良的偏倚硬币上下法确定每组中丙泊酚诱导意识消失的95%有效剂量,这是主要结局指标。
总共120例患者被随机分为3组(每组n = 40)。P组、PR组和PMR组中丙泊酚诱导意识消失的95%有效剂量分别为1.13、0.87和0.72mg/kg。与P组相比,PMR组在丙泊酚注射前(P = 0.041)以及丙泊酚给药后2分钟(P = 0.005)和3分钟(P < 0.001)时平均血压(MBP)下降更显著,但在其他时间点组间无差异。
在未使用和使用咪达唑仑的情况下,瑞芬太尼预处理可分别使老年患者丙泊酚诱导意识消失的有效剂量降低23%和36%。然而,瑞芬太尼和咪达唑仑预处理时MBP的下降幅度大于单独使用丙泊酚时。这些发现表明,由于诱导期间的血流动力学不稳定,老年患者在使用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼输注时咪达唑仑预处理应谨慎使用。