Suppr超能文献

瑞芬太尼输注全麻诱导期丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠对血流动力学影响的比较:一项双盲、年龄分层、随机研究。

Comparison between hemodynamic effects of propofol and thiopental during general anesthesia induction with remifentanil infusion: a double-blind, age-stratified, randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-5-7 Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8586, Japan.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2019 Aug;33(4):509-515. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02657-x. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Propofol is commonly used with remifentanil for induction of general anesthesia (GA); however, it often leads to hypotension. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative adverse events. By contrast, thiopental has less negative inotropic effects on hemodynamics compared to propofol, which could be suitable to prevent hypotension during GA induction. In the present age-stratified, randomized, assessor-blinded study, using the ClearSight system, we compared the hemodynamic effects of propofol and thiopental during GA induction under remifentanil infusion in non-cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Patients were divided into young (20-40 year), middle (41-70 year), and elderly (> 70 year) groups (n = 20, each group). General anesthesia was induced with remifentanil 0.3 μg/kg/min, followed by propofol (2.0, 1.5, and 1.2 mg/kg) or thiopental (5.0, 4.0, and 3.0 mg/kg) in the young, middle, and elderly groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the difference in the decrease in mean arterial blood pressure between patients receiving propofol and thiopental in each age group. The secondary outcomes included other hemodynamic parameters and minimal bispectral index values measured up to 10 min after tracheal intubation.

RESULTS

The decrease in mean arterial blood pressure was greater in patients receiving propofol than those receiving thiopental (- 45.4 vs - 26.6 mmHg and - 45.7 vs - 28.9 mmHg, P = 0.003 and 0.007, respectively), whereas no significant difference was observed in the young age group (P = 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopental is a more suitable agent than propofol for avoiding hypotension during GA induction under remifentanil infusion in the middle and elderly patients.

摘要

目的

异丙酚常与瑞芬太尼联合用于全身麻醉(GA)的诱导;然而,它常导致低血压。术中低血压与术后不良事件相关。相比之下,硫喷妥钠对血流动力学的负性变力作用小于异丙酚,这可能适合预防 GA 诱导期间的低血压。在本年龄分层、随机、评估者盲法研究中,我们使用 ClearSight 系统比较了非心脏手术中瑞芬太尼输注时 GA 诱导期间使用异丙酚和硫喷妥钠的血流动力学效应。

方法

患者分为青年(20-40 岁)、中年(41-70 岁)和老年(>70 岁)组(每组 20 例)。全身麻醉诱导用瑞芬太尼 0.3μg/kg/min,随后青年、中年和老年组分别给予异丙酚(2.0、1.5 和 1.2mg/kg)或硫喷妥钠(5.0、4.0 和 3.0mg/kg)。主要结局是每个年龄组中接受异丙酚和硫喷妥钠的患者之间平均动脉血压下降的差异。次要结局包括其他血流动力学参数和气管插管后 10 分钟内测量的最小脑电双频指数值。

结果

接受异丙酚的患者平均动脉血压下降幅度大于接受硫喷妥钠的患者(-45.4 与-26.6mmHg 和-45.7 与-28.9mmHg,P=0.003 和 0.007),而在青年组中差异无统计学意义(P=0.96)。

结论

在瑞芬太尼输注下,对于中年和老年患者,硫喷妥钠比异丙酚更适合避免 GA 诱导期间的低血压。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验