University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Berlin, Germany.
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):249-265. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12482. Epub 2019 May 7.
Personality traits and cognitive ability are well-established predictors of academic performance. Yet, how consistent and generalizable are the associations between personality, cognitive ability, and performance? Building on theoretical arguments that trait-performance relations should vary depending on the demands and opportunities for trait expression in the learning environment, we investigated whether the associations of personality (Big Five) and cognitive ability (fluid intelligence) with academic performance (grades and tests scores) vary across school subjects (German and math) and across ability-grouped school tracks (academic, intermediate, and vocational).
Multiple group structural equation models in a large representative sample of ninth-grade students (N = 12,915) from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS).
Differential associations across school subjects emerged for cognitive ability, Emotional Stability, and Conscientiousness (math > German); and for Openness and Extraversion (German > math). Differential associations across school tracks emerged for cognitive ability, Conscientiousness (academic > intermediate > vocational) and Agreeableness (academic > intermediate > vocational). Personality traits explained more variation in academic performance in the academic than in the other tracks.
Most trait-performance relations varied across subjects, tracks, or both. These findings highlight the need for more nuanced and context-minded perspective on trait-performance relations.
人格特质和认知能力是学业表现的良好预测指标。然而,人格、认知能力和表现之间的关联有多一致和普遍呢?基于理论观点,即特质-表现关系应根据学习环境中特质表达的需求和机会而有所不同,我们研究了人格(大五人格)和认知能力(流体智力)与学业表现(成绩和考试分数)之间的关联是否因学校科目(德语和数学)和能力分组的学校轨道(学术、中级和职业)而有所不同。
采用德国国家教育面板研究(NEPS)中一个大规模的九年级学生代表性样本(N=12915)的多组结构方程模型。
认知能力、情绪稳定性和尽责性在学校科目上出现了差异关联(数学>德语);而开放性和外向性在学校科目上出现了差异关联(德语>数学)。认知能力、尽责性(学术>中级>职业)和宜人性(学术>中级>职业)在学校轨道上出现了差异关联。人格特质在学术轨道上比在其他轨道上更能解释学业表现的更多变化。
大多数特质-表现关系在科目、轨道或两者之间都有所不同。这些发现强调了需要更细致入微和注重情境的视角来看待特质-表现关系。