Lechner Clemens M, Bender Jens, Brandt Naemi D, Rammstedt Beatrice
GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 21;12:679438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679438. eCollection 2021.
Some researchers and policymakers advocate a stronger focus on fostering socio-emotional skills in the hope of helping students to succeed academically, especially those who are socially disadvantaged. Others have cautioned that this might increase, rather than reduce, social inequality because personality traits conducive to achievement are themselves unevenly distributed in disfavor of socially disadvantaged students. Our paper contributes to this debate. Analyzing representative, large-scale data on 9,300 ninth graders from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) and using the Big Five personality traits as a measure of socio-emotional skills, we cast light on two related yet distinct aspects of social inequality in socio-emotional skills: First, do of personality traits conducive to achievement vary as a function of students' parental socioeconomic status (pSES)? Second, do the to personality traits in terms of trait-achievement relations vary as function of pSES? Results showed that differences in Big Five traits between students with different pSES were small (0.04 ≤ | ≤ 0.09), especially when compared with pSES-related differences in cognitive skills (fluid intelligence) and sex-related differences in personality. The returns to Conscientiousness-the personality trait most relevant to achievement-in terms of its relations to academic achievement were higher in higher- vs. lower-SES students. Trait-achievement relations did not vary as a function of pSES for the other Big Five traits. Overall, both types of inequality were limited in magnitude. We discuss the implications of these findings for policy and practice and delineate directions for further research.
一些研究人员和政策制定者主张更加强调培养社会情感技能,以期帮助学生在学业上取得成功,尤其是那些处于社会弱势地位的学生。另一些人则警告说,这可能会加剧而非减少社会不平等,因为有助于取得成就的人格特质本身在分布上就不均衡,不利于社会弱势学生。我们的论文为这场辩论做出了贡献。通过分析来自德国国家教育面板研究(NEPS)的9300名九年级学生的代表性大规模数据,并将大五人格特质作为社会情感技能的衡量标准,我们揭示了社会情感技能方面社会不平等的两个相关但不同的方面:第一,有助于取得成就的人格特质是否会因学生父母的社会经济地位(pSES)而有所不同?第二,在特质与成就的关系方面,对人格特质的反应是否会因pSES而有所不同?结果表明,不同pSES学生在大五人格特质上的差异很小(0.04≤|效应大小|≤0.09),尤其是与认知技能(流体智力)中与pSES相关的差异以及人格中与性别相关的差异相比时。尽责性——与成就最相关的人格特质——在高社会经济地位与低社会经济地位学生中,其与学业成就的关系所带来的回报更高。对于其他大五人格特质,特质与成就的关系并不会因pSES而有所不同。总体而言,这两种不平等的程度都有限。我们讨论了这些发现对政策和实践的影响,并勾勒了进一步研究的方向。