• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测学业成绩:尽责性能否弥补智力不足?

Predicting School Grades: Can Conscientiousness Compensate for Intelligence?

作者信息

Friedrich Teresa Sophie, Schütz Astrid

机构信息

Institute for Employment Research, 90478 Nuremberg, Germany.

Institute for Psychology, University of Bamberg, 96047 Bamberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 Jul 20;11(7):146. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070146.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence11070146
PMID:37504789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381607/
Abstract

Intelligence and noncognitive factors such as conscientiousness are strongly related to academic performance. As theory and research differ with respect to their interplay in predicting performance, the present study examines whether conscientiousness compensates for intelligence or enhances the effect of intelligence on performance in 3775 13th grade students from Germany. Latent moderation analyses show positive main effects of intelligence and conscientiousness on grades. Further, analyses reveal synergistic interactions in predicting grades in biology, mathematics, and German, but no interaction in predicting grades in English. Intelligence and grades are more strongly linked if students are conscientious. Multigroup models detected gender differences in biology, but no differences with respect to SES. In biology, conscientiousness has especially strong effects in intelligent men. Conscientiousness thus enhances the effect of intelligence on performance in several subjects.

摘要

智力和尽责性等非认知因素与学业成绩密切相关。由于理论和研究在预测成绩时它们的相互作用方面存在差异,本研究调查了在来自德国的3775名13年级学生中,尽责性是否能弥补智力的不足,或者增强智力对成绩的影响。潜在调节分析表明,智力和尽责性对成绩有积极的主效应。此外,分析揭示了在预测生物、数学和德语成绩时存在协同交互作用,但在预测英语成绩时不存在交互作用。如果学生尽责,智力与成绩的联系会更紧密。多组模型检测到在生物学科上存在性别差异,但在社会经济地位方面没有差异。在生物学科中,尽责性对聪明的男性影响尤为显著。因此,尽责性增强了智力对多个学科成绩的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0c/10381607/47982a2c6e77/jintelligence-11-00146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0c/10381607/0d9702c35834/jintelligence-11-00146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0c/10381607/47982a2c6e77/jintelligence-11-00146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0c/10381607/0d9702c35834/jintelligence-11-00146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0c/10381607/47982a2c6e77/jintelligence-11-00146-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting School Grades: Can Conscientiousness Compensate for Intelligence?预测学业成绩:尽责性能否弥补智力不足?
J Intell. 2023 Jul 20;11(7):146. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070146.
2
Is There Evidence for Intelligence-by-Conscientiousness Interaction in the Prediction of Change in School Grades from Age 11 to 15 Years?从11岁到15岁学校成绩变化预测中,尽责性与智力交互作用是否有证据?
J Intell. 2023 Feb 25;11(3):45. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030045.
3
Fluid Intelligence and Competence Development in Secondary Schooling: No Evidence for a Moderating Role of Conscientiousness.中学阶段的流体智力与能力发展:没有证据表明尽责性具有调节作用。
J Intell. 2022 Apr 28;10(2):27. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10020027.
4
The influence of chronotype and intelligence on academic achievement in primary school is mediated by conscientiousness, midpoint of sleep and motivation.昼夜节律类型和智力对小学学业成绩的影响是通过尽责性、睡眠中点和动机来介导的。
Chronobiol Int. 2015 Apr;32(3):349-57. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.980508. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
Unraveling the Relationship Between Teacher-Assigned Grades, Student Personality, and Standardized Test Scores.解析教师评定成绩、学生个性与标准化考试分数之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 19;12:627440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627440. eCollection 2021.
6
Are some students graded more appropriately than others? Student characteristics as moderators of the relationships between teacher-assigned grades and test scores in mathematics.是否有些学生的评分比其他学生更合适?学生特征作为教师评分与数学考试成绩之间关系的调节变量。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Sep;91(3):865-881. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12397. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance: Differential associations across school subjects and school tracks.人格、认知能力与学业表现:不同学科和学校轨道的关联差异。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):249-265. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12482. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
Parental styles, conscientiousness, and academic performance in high school: a three-wave longitudinal study.父母教养方式、尽责性与高中学习成绩:一项三波次纵向研究
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Apr;34(4):451-61. doi: 10.1177/0146167207311909.
9
Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement.个性与智力在学业成绩预测中相互作用。
J Intell. 2018 May 10;6(2):27. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6020027.
10
Sex ratios in the most-selective elite US undergraduate colleges and universities are consistent with the hypothesis that modern educational systems increasingly select for conscientious personality compared with intelligence.美国最具选拔性的精英本科院校中的性别比例与这样一种假设相符,即与智力相比,现代教育系统越来越倾向于选拔具有尽责性格的人。
Med Hypotheses. 2009 Aug;73(2):127-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Elusive Sources for Gender Differences in Spatial Ability: The Role of Personality, Spatial Interests, and Everyday Behaviours.空间能力性别差异的难以捉摸的来源:人格、空间兴趣和日常行为的作用。
Psychol Russ. 2025 Mar 1;18(1):35-59. doi: 10.11621/pir.2025.0103. eCollection 2025.
2
Path analysis reveals cross-country differences between Czech and Chinese university students in effect of internet and smartphone addiction, mental health, and personality traits on academic achievement in the post-pandemic era.路径分析揭示了后疫情时代,捷克和中国大学生在网络和智能手机成瘾、心理健康和人格特质对学业成绩的影响方面存在的跨国差异。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 17;12(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02069-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Fluid Intelligence and Competence Development in Secondary Schooling: No Evidence for a Moderating Role of Conscientiousness.中学阶段的流体智力与能力发展:没有证据表明尽责性具有调节作用。
J Intell. 2022 Apr 28;10(2):27. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10020027.
2
Personality and Intelligence Interact in the Prediction of Academic Achievement.个性与智力在学业成绩预测中相互作用。
J Intell. 2018 May 10;6(2):27. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6020027.
3
Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance: Differential associations across school subjects and school tracks.
人格、认知能力与学业表现:不同学科和学校轨道的关联差异。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):249-265. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12482. Epub 2019 May 7.
4
Life Satisfaction and Academic Performance in Early Adolescents: Evidence for Reciprocal Association.青少年早期的生活满意度与学业成绩:相互关联的证据
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Dec;53(6):479-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
5
Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method.估计和解释潜在变量交互作用:应用潜在调节结构方程方法的教程
Int J Behav Dev. 2015 Jan 1;39(1):87-96. doi: 10.1177/0165025414552301. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis.性别差异在学业成就上的表现:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1174-204. doi: 10.1037/a0036620. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
7
Self-concept and academic achievement: a meta-analysis of longitudinal relations.自我概念与学业成就:纵向关系的元分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2011 Oct;49(5):505-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
8
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.人格五因素模型与学业成绩的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):322-38. doi: 10.1037/a0014996.
9
Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: evidence from two national samples.全生命周期中“大五”人格特质的年龄差异:来自两个全国性样本的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):558-66. doi: 10.1037/a0012897.
10
Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures.为什么男人不能更像女人?55种文化中五大性格特质的性别差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):168-182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168.