• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 FDA 不良事件报告系统对直接口服抗凝剂的安全性进行比较分析。

A comparative analysis of the safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants using the FDA adverse event reporting system.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Division of Hematology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2019 Jul;103(1):43-46. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13240. Epub 2019 May 6.

DOI:10.1111/ejh.13240
PMID:31009121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6786266/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are being increasingly used. However, unlike warfarin, less is known regarding their long-term side effects. To better evaluate the rates of DOAC-related adverse events (AEs) on a population level, we examined AEs reported to the FDA for three commonly used DOACs and warfarin.

METHODS

We evaluated the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, which compiles reported drug-related AEs from 1969 onwards. The safety profiles of the included drugs were assessed by comparing AEs per outpatient prescription and with proportional reporting ratios (PRR).

RESULTS

Rivaroxaban had the highest proportion of reported AEs. Most notably the rate for breakthrough venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher than other DOACs. Dabigatran had the highest reported rates of ischemic stroke. When the DOAC data were analyzed using PRR, reported rates of VTE were again higher with rivaroxaban while dabigatran again showed slightly higher than expected rates of ischemic stroke. Apixaban did not show higher than expected rates in any category.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis found rates of reported breakthrough VTE were significantly higher with rivaroxaban, while apixaban had no higher than expected rates of any studied AEs.

摘要

简介

直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的应用日益增多。然而,与华法林不同,人们对其长期副作用的了解较少。为了更全面地评估人群中 DOAC 相关不良事件(AE)的发生率,我们研究了 FDA 对三种常用 DOAC 和华法林的不良事件报告。

方法

我们评估了 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,该数据库从 1969 年起汇编了与药物相关的不良事件报告。通过比较门诊处方中的不良事件发生率和比例报告比(PRR)来评估纳入药物的安全性概况。

结果

利伐沙班的不良事件报告比例最高。值得注意的是,突破性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的发生率高于其他 DOAC。达比加群的缺血性卒中报告率最高。当使用 PRR 分析 DOAC 数据时,利伐沙班的 VTE 报告率再次较高,而达比加群的缺血性卒中报告率也略高于预期。阿哌沙班在任何类别中均未显示出高于预期的发生率。

结论

我们的分析发现,利伐沙班的突破性 VTE 报告率显著较高,而阿哌沙班的任何研究 AE 发生率均未高于预期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e0/6786266/4273aeca6337/nihms-1053364-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e0/6786266/4273aeca6337/nihms-1053364-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e0/6786266/4273aeca6337/nihms-1053364-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of the safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants using the FDA adverse event reporting system.使用 FDA 不良事件报告系统对直接口服抗凝剂的安全性进行比较分析。
Eur J Haematol. 2019 Jul;103(1):43-46. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13240. Epub 2019 May 6.
2
Impact of oral anticoagulation choice on healthcare utilization for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism.口服抗凝药物选择对静脉血栓栓塞症初级治疗的医疗保健利用的影响。
Vasc Med. 2020 Dec;25(6):549-556. doi: 10.1177/1358863X20940388. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation.癌症合并心房颤动患者中直接口服抗凝剂与华法林的疗效比较。
Blood Adv. 2018 Feb 13;2(3):200-209. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017010694.
4
Comparison of the Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulants Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban in the Extended Treatment and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班在静脉血栓栓塞症长期治疗和预防中的比较:系统评价与网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0160064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160064. eCollection 2016.
5
Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Obese Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在肥胖急性静脉血栓栓塞症患者中的疗效和安全性。
Pharmacotherapy. 2020 Mar;40(3):204-210. doi: 10.1002/phar.2369. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Equivalent thrombotic risk with Warfarin, Dabigatran, or Enoxaparin after failure of initial direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy.初始直接口服抗凝 (DOAC) 治疗失败后,华法林、达比加群或依诺肝素的血栓栓塞风险相当。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Jun;57(5):871-876. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-02978-z. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
7
Association of Type of Oral Anticoagulant Dispensed With Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Patients Extending Anticoagulation Therapy Beyond 90 Days After Hospitalization for Venous Thromboembolism.口服抗凝药物类型与静脉血栓栓塞症住院后抗凝治疗超过 90 天患者不良临床结局的相关性。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 15;327(11):1051-1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1920.
8
Evaluation of oral anticoagulants for the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism using a mixed-treatment comparison, meta-analytic approach.采用混合治疗比较的荟萃分析方法评估口服抗凝剂用于静脉血栓栓塞症的长期治疗。
Clin Ther. 2014 Oct 1;36(10):1454-64.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.033. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
9
Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗美国国防部人群中未经治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的有效性和安全性比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1.
10
Safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants in extreme weights.极端体重患者口服抗凝剂的安全性和有效性。
Thromb Res. 2023 Nov;231:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Signal mining of adverse events of proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma based on FAERS.基于FAERS的多发性骨髓瘤蛋白酶体抑制剂不良事件信号挖掘
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 3;15:1396378. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1396378. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of oral factor Xa inhibitor-associated extracranial bleeding reversal with andexanet alfa.评估andexanet alfa 逆转口服因子 Xa 抑制剂相关的颅外出血。
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Oct;18(10):2532-2541. doi: 10.1111/jth.15031. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced-dose direct oral anticoagulants in the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在静脉血栓栓塞症的延长治疗中使用低剂量直接口服抗凝剂:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jul;16(7):1288-1295. doi: 10.1111/jth.14156. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
2
Signals of bleeding among direct-acting oral anticoagulant users compared to those among warfarin users: analyses of the post-marketing FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, 2010-2015.与华法林使用者相比,直接口服抗凝剂使用者的出血信号:2010 - 2015年美国食品药品监督管理局上市后不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 May 1;14:803-809. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S161148. eCollection 2018.
3
Signal detection for bleeding associated with the use of direct oral anticoagulants.
与直接口服抗凝剂使用相关的出血的信号检测
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Jul 1;75(13):973-977. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170529. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin, Stratified by Stroke Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.直接口服抗凝剂和华法林在房颤患者中的卒中风险分层的有效性和安全性。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;122(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
Direct Oral Anticoagulants and the Paradigm Shift in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism.直接口服抗凝剂与静脉血栓栓塞症管理模式的转变。
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2018 Apr;44(3):261-266. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1637750. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
Betrixaban (Bevyxxa): A Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant Factor Xa Inhibitor.贝曲沙班(Bevyxxa):一种直接作用的口服抗凝剂,Xa因子抑制剂。
P T. 2018 Feb;43(2):85-120.
7
Mortality and oral anticoagulants in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统中的死亡率与口服抗凝剂
Open Heart. 2017 Jun 1;4(2):e000629. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000629. eCollection 2017.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与华法林相比治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725.
9
Dabigatran etexilate and risk of myocardial infarction, other cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.达比加群酯与心肌梗死、其他心血管事件、大出血及全因死亡率的风险:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jun 6;3(3):e000515. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000515.
10
Biases affecting the proportional reporting ratio (PPR) in spontaneous reports pharmacovigilance databases: the example of sertindole.影响自发报告药物警戒数据库中比例报告率(PPR)的偏倚:以舍吲哚为例。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Jun;12(4):271-81. doi: 10.1002/pds.848.