Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.
Health Policy, King's Business School, King's College London, Bush House, 30 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jun;230:111-121. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
Major service change in healthcare - whereby the distribution of services is reconfigured at a local or regional level - is often a contested, political and poorly understood set of processes. This paper contributes to the theoretical understanding of major service change by demonstrating the utility of interpreting health service reconfiguration as a biopolitical intervention. Such an approach orients the analytical focus towards an exploration of the spatial and the population - crucial factors in major service change. Drawing on a qualitative study from 2011-12 of major service change in the English NHS combining documentary analyses of historically relevant policy papers and contemporary policy documentation (n = 125) with semi-structured interviews (n = 20) we highlight how a particular 'geography of stroke' in London was created building upon multiple types of knowledge: medical, epidemiological, economic, demographic, managerial and organisational. These informed particular spatial practices of government providing legitimation for the significant political upheaval that accompanies NHS service reconfiguration by problematizing existing variation in outcomes and making these visible. We suggest that major service change may be analysed as a 'practice of security' - a way of redefining a case, conceiving of risks and dangers, and averting potential crises in the interests of the population.
医疗保健领域的重大服务变革——即服务的分布在地方或地区层面上重新配置——通常是一个有争议的、政治性的和理解不足的过程。本文通过展示将卫生服务重构解释为一种生命政治干预的实用性,为重大服务变革的理论理解做出了贡献。这种方法将分析重点定位为探索空间和人口——重大服务变革的关键因素。本研究借鉴了 2011-12 年英国国民保健制度中重大服务变革的定性研究,结合了对历史上相关政策文件和当代政策文件(n=125)的文献分析以及半结构化访谈(n=20),我们强调了如何在伦敦建立特定的“中风地理”,利用多种类型的知识:医学、流行病学、经济、人口、管理和组织。这些知识为特定的政府空间实践提供了合法性,为 NHS 服务重构带来的重大政治动荡提供了合法性,使现有的结果差异变得明显。我们认为,重大服务变革可以被分析为一种“安全实践”——一种重新定义案例、构想风险和危险以及为了人口利益避免潜在危机的方式。