• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非模块化干骺端型股骨柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中是一种可行的模块化干骺端型股骨柄替代选择。

Nonmodular Stems Are a Viable Alternative to Modular Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S292-S296. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.007
PMID:31010773
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nonmodular and modular femoral stems have been associated with complications after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). As such, the ideal femoral component for rTHA remains undecided. This study aims to report outcomes of titanium, tapered-fluted, modular and nonmodular femoral components in rTHA.

METHODS

From January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2017, all rTHAs using modular or nonmodular femoral stems were identified. Demographic data including age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were collected. Surgical details including operative time and implant cost were also collected. Clinical outcomes including length of stay, dislocation, infection, fracture, reoperation, and re-revision were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and Student's t-test for all categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six rTHA cases (103 modular and 43 nonmodular) were identified with an average follow-up of 29 months (range 3-59 months). Nonmodular stems had a significantly lower cost when compared to modular implants (modular stems 120.8% higher cost; P < .001). The surgical time of nonmodular components was significantly greater (193 minutes vs 163 minutes; P = .029). There were no differences observed in any other surgical details or clinical outcomes assessed, including length of stay (P = .323), rate of re-revision of the femoral implant (P = .389), rate of re-operation (P = .383), and postop complications (P = .241), including infection (P = .095), dislocation (P = .778), and fracture (P = .959).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonmodular components provide encouraging clinical results with significantly lower costs compared to modular implants in rTHA. The use of titanium, tapered-fluted, nonmodular components may offer a more cost-effective approach to rTHA compared to their modular counterparts.

摘要

背景

非模块化和模块化股骨柄在翻修全髋关节置换术后(rTHA)与并发症相关。因此,rTHA 的理想股骨组件仍未确定。本研究旨在报告 rTHA 中钛制、锥形槽、模块化和非模块化股骨组件的结果。

方法

从 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日,确定了所有使用模块化或非模块化股骨柄的 rTHA。收集了包括年龄、性别和美国麻醉医师协会评分在内的人口统计学数据。还收集了手术细节,包括手术时间和植入物成本。收集了包括住院时间、脱位、感染、骨折、再次手术和再次翻修在内的临床结果。使用卡方检验和学生 t 检验分别对所有分类和连续变量进行统计学分析。

结果

确定了 146 例 rTHA 病例(103 例为模块化,43 例为非模块化),平均随访 29 个月(范围 3-59 个月)。与模块化植入物相比,非模块化植入物的成本明显更低(模块化植入物成本高 120.8%;P<0.001)。非模块化组件的手术时间明显更长(193 分钟与 163 分钟;P=0.029)。在任何其他手术细节或临床结果评估中,包括住院时间(P=0.323)、股骨植入物再次翻修率(P=0.389)、再次手术率(P=0.383)和术后并发症(P=0.241),包括感染(P=0.095)、脱位(P=0.778)和骨折(P=0.959),均未观察到差异。

结论

与模块化植入物相比,非模块化组件在 rTHA 中提供了令人鼓舞的临床结果,且成本显著降低。与模块化部件相比,使用钛制、锥形槽、非模块化部件可能为 rTHA 提供更具成本效益的方法。

相似文献

1
Nonmodular Stems Are a Viable Alternative to Modular Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.非模块化干骺端型股骨柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中是一种可行的模块化干骺端型股骨柄替代选择。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S292-S296. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化与非模块化锥形带槽钛柄的区别是什么。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3108-3113. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 May 18.
3
Comparison of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.模块化和非模块化锥形开槽钛制股骨柄在髋关节翻修术中的比较:一项至少 6 年的随访研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70626-6.
4
Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.非模块化锥形带槽钛柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中短期内能可靠地实现骨整合。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):186-192. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5091-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
5
Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components.翻修术后使用组合式和一体式假体的全髋关节置换术后下沉。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S299-S303. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
6
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.模块化锥形开槽柄在治疗 Paprosky III 和 IV 型股骨缺损或 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型股骨骨折的股骨翻修中的影像学和临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1069-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.039. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
7
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem.单块式带螺纹锥形喷砂钛合金柄的翻修全髋关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3698-3703. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.045. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem.REDAPT 一体式、渐缩、带槽、喷砂、锻造钛制翻修股骨柄的短期疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):191-197. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0743.R1.
9
Incidence and Predictors of Subsidence Using Modular, Tapered, Fluted Titanium Femoral Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.在无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术中使用模块化、锥形、带槽钛股骨柄的下沉发生率及预测因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.057. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
10
Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.模块化带槽锥形柄在无菌翻修全髋关节置换术中的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 17;99(10):873-881. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00423.

引用本文的文献

1
Revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture: epidemiology, outcomes, and factors associated with success.人工关节周围骨折的翻修全髋关节置换术:流行病学、结果及与成功相关的因素。
Ann Jt. 2023 Jul 10;8:30. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-16. eCollection 2023.
2
Modular versus monoblock stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化与一体式股骨柄的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Jt. 2023 Sep 20;8:32. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-33. eCollection 2023.