• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植项目特定报告改革的时机:AST/ASTS 移植指标工作组。

Time for reform in transplant program-specific reporting: AST/ASTS transplant metrics taskforce.

机构信息

Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham& Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Abdominal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):1888-1895. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15394. Epub 2019 May 23.

DOI:10.1111/ajt.15394
PMID:31012525
Abstract

In accordance with the National Organ Transplant Act and Department of Health and Human Services' Final Rule, the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) publicly releases biannual program-specific reports that include analyses of transplant centers' risk-adjusted waitlist mortality, organ acceptance ratios, transplant rates, and graft and patient survival. Since the inception of these center metrics, 1-year posttransplant graft and patient survival have improved, and center variation has decreased, casting uncertainty on their clinical relevance. The SRTR has recently modified center evaluations by ranking centers into 5 tiers rather than 3 tiers in an attempt to discriminate between programs performing within a tight range, further exacerbating this uncertainty. The American Society of Transplantation/American Society of Transplant Surgeons convened an expert taskforce to examine both the utility and unintended consequences of transplant center metrics. Estimates of center variation in outcomes in adjacent tiers are imprecise and fleeting, but can result in consequential changes in clinician and center behavior. The taskforce has concerns that current metrics, based principally on 1-year graft and patient survival, provide minimal if any benefit in informing patient choice and access to transplantation, with the untoward effect of decreased utilization of organs and restriction of research and innovation.

摘要

根据《国家器官移植法》和美国卫生与公众服务部的最终规定,移植受者科学登记处(SRTR)每半年发布一次特定项目的报告,其中包括对移植中心风险调整候补者死亡率、器官接受率、移植率以及移植物和患者存活率的分析。自这些中心指标设立以来,移植后 1 年的移植物和患者存活率有所提高,中心间的差异也有所缩小,这使得这些指标的临床相关性受到质疑。SRTR 最近通过将中心分为 5 个等级,而不是 3 个等级,对中心评估进行了修改,试图区分在严格范围内运作的项目,这进一步加剧了这种不确定性。美国移植协会/美国移植外科学会召集了一个专家工作组,审查移植中心指标的效用和意外后果。对相邻等级中心结果差异的估计不准确且短暂,但可能导致临床医生和中心行为发生重大变化。工作组担心,目前主要基于 1 年移植物和患者存活率的指标,在告知患者选择和接受移植方面几乎没有任何益处,反而会降低器官的利用率,并限制研究和创新。

相似文献

1
Time for reform in transplant program-specific reporting: AST/ASTS transplant metrics taskforce.移植项目特定报告改革的时机:AST/ASTS 移植指标工作组。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):1888-1895. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15394. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Kidney transplant program specific reporting and transplant metrics.肾脏移植项目特定报告与移植指标
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2022 Feb 1;27(1):70-74. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000947.
3
Transplant Center Variability in Organ Offer Acceptance and Mortality Among US Patients on the Heart Transplant Waitlist.美国心脏移植候补患者中器官提供接受率和死亡率的移植中心变异性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):660-668. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0659.
4
Transplant community perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of alternative quality metrics for regulation.移植社区对替代质量指标在监管方面的优缺点的看法。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Apr;33(4):e13500. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13500. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
5
Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.考察肾脏利用情况与获取绩效之间的关系。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1614-1623. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16985. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
The Current State of Liver Transplantation in the United States: Perspective From American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) Scientific Studies Committee and Endorsed by ASTS Council.美国肝移植的现状:美国移植外科学会(ASTS)科学研究委员会的观点,并得到 ASTS 理事会的认可。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Nov;16(11):3093-3104. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14017. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing.移植前和移植后项目评分与候选者列名后的死亡率的相关性。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):399-406. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15032. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
8
Program-specific transplant rate ratios: Association with allocation priority at listing and posttransplant outcomes.特定项目的移植率比值:与列表中的分配优先级和移植后结果的关联。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jun;18(6):1360-1369. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14684. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
9
Seeking new answers to old questions about public reporting of transplant program performance in the United States.探寻美国移植项目绩效公众报告中旧问题的新答案。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):317-323. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15051. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Reported effects of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 5-tier rating system on US transplant centers: results of a national survey.报告的器官移植受者科学注册系统 5 级评分系统对美国移植中心的影响:全国调查结果。
Transpl Int. 2018 Oct;31(10):1135-1143. doi: 10.1111/tri.13282. Epub 2018 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Willingness to Become a Living Organ Donor.与愿意成为活体器官捐赠者相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2527592. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.27592.
2
Defining Referral for a Kidney Transplant Evaluation as a Quality Indicator: A Population-Based Cohort Study.将肾脏移植评估转诊定义为一项质量指标:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Mar 21;12:20543581251317009. doi: 10.1177/20543581251317009. eCollection 2025.
3
Transforming liver transplant allocation with artificial intelligence and machine learning: a systematic review.
利用人工智能和机器学习改变肝移植分配:一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02890-3.
4
Association Between Dialysis Facility Ownership and Access to the Waiting List and Transplant in Pediatric Patients With End-stage Kidney Disease in the US.美国终末期肾病儿科患者接受透析治疗的机会与透析中心所有权的关系:等待名单和移植。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 2;328(5):451-459. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11231.
5
Textbook Outcome as a Quality Metric in Liver Transplantation.教科书式结局作为肝移植中的一项质量指标
Transplant Direct. 2022 Apr 15;8(5):e1322. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001322. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Solid Organ Transplantation.十大要点:姑息治疗临床医生应该了解的实体器官移植。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;25(7):1136-1142. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0013. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
Center Variation in Indication and Short-Term Outcomes after Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Analysis of a Merged United Network for Organ Sharing - Pediatric Health Information System Cohort.儿科心脏移植后适应证和短期结局的中心差异:联合器官共享网络-儿科健康信息系统队列的分析。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Mar;43(3):636-644. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02768-x. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
8
The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-eighth adult heart transplantation report - 2021; Focus on recipient characteristics.国际心脏和肺移植协会国际胸科器官移植登记处:2021年第38份成人心脏移植报告;关注受者特征
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Oct;40(10):1035-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
9
Associations Among Different Domains of Quality Among US Liver Transplant Programs.美国肝移植项目不同领域质量之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2118502. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18502.
10
Definition and Analysis of Textbook Outcome: A Novel Quality Measure in Kidney Transplantation.教科书式结局的定义与分析:肾移植中的一种全新质量衡量指标。
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1504-1513. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05943-y. Epub 2021 Jan 23.