1 Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, Georgia 30223-1797.
2 Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, Georgia 30223-1797.
J Food Prot. 2019 May;82(5):854-861. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-347.
Outbreaks associated with fresh-cut leafy greens continue to occur despite efforts to implement horticultural practices that minimize introduction of enteric pathogens to the crop. The experimental trials in this study were designed to examine the efficacy of an acetic acid (AA)- and chitosan-based spray treatment, applied 1 day prior to harvest, for reducing the prevalence of O157:H7 (O157) and in field-grown leafy greens contaminated at levels detectable only through enrichment culture. Responses to the treatment solution were variable and depended on the type of leafy green (leafy lettuce, spinach, or cabbage), cultivar, pathogen, and AA concentration (0.3 to 0.7%). No significant differences in O157 prevalence were found for untreated and treated cabbage heads and spinach plants ( > 0.05). In contrast, treatment significantly affected on 'Bravo F1' green cabbage and '7-Green' spinach ( < 0.05), with odds ratios of 2.2 and 3.3 for finding the pathogen on untreated versus treated greens, respectively. was also 7.1 times more likely to be found on an untreated lettuce plant than on a lettuce plant sprayed with a 0.7% AA treatment solution (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 12.2; < 0.0001). In studies addressing the efficacy of chitosan (0.1 or 0.3%), this chemical failed to reduce the prevalence of either pathogen on lettuce ( > 0.05). Similarly, spraying with 0.3% AA did not affect the prevalence of on lettuce plants ( > 0.05); however, treatment solutions with 0.4% AA reduced the likelihood of detecting in treated versus untreated plants by 6.6 times (95% CI, 2.1 to 20.9; = 0.0007). After the lettuce was harvested and hand washed, consumers failed to distinguish either visually or organoleptically between untreated lettuce and lettuce sprayed with an acetic acid solution ( > 0.05). These results indicate that acetic acid could be used to reduce the microbiological risk of preharvest leafy greens.
尽管人们努力实施园艺措施以最大限度地减少肠道病原体进入作物,但与新鲜叶菜有关的疫情仍持续发生。本研究中的实验旨在检验一种醋酸(AA)和壳聚糖喷雾处理的效果,该处理在收获前 1 天应用,以降低仅通过富集培养可检测到的田间生长的叶菜中 O157:H7(O157)和 的流行率。对处理溶液的反应各不相同,取决于叶菜的类型(生菜、菠菜或白菜)、品种、病原体和 AA 浓度(0.3 至 0.7%)。未发现未经处理和处理过的白菜头和菠菜植株的 O157 流行率有显著差异(>0.05)。相比之下,处理显著影响了“Bravo F1”白菜和“7-Green”菠菜中的 (<0.05),未处理与处理的绿叶菜中发现病原体的几率比分别为 2.2 和 3.3。未经处理的生菜植株上发现 的可能性也比用 0.7%AA 处理溶液喷雾处理的生菜植株高 7.1 倍(95%置信区间[CI],4.1 至 12.2;<0.0001)。在研究壳聚糖(0.1%或 0.3%)功效的研究中,这种化学物质未能降低生菜上任何一种病原体的流行率(>0.05)。同样,用 0.3%AA 喷雾处理也不会影响生菜上 的流行率(>0.05);然而,用 0.4%AA 处理的溶液将处理过的与未经处理的植物中检测到 的可能性降低了 6.6 倍(95%CI,2.1 至 20.9;=0.0007)。在收获和手洗后,消费者无法通过视觉或感官分辨未经处理的生菜和用醋酸溶液喷雾处理的生菜(>0.05)。这些结果表明,醋酸可用于降低收获前叶菜的微生物风险。