Shuai Liu, Leilei Zou, Wen Wen, Shu Wang, Gangsheng Liu, Yinglong Li, Guoke Yang, Xinrong Chang, Hong Liu, Rongfeng Liao
Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;30(4):658-667. doi: 10.1177/1120672119841216. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
Amblyopia is speculated to be an untreatable disease in the patient, who is beyond the critical period of vision; however, currently, it is treatable in adults.
This study aimed to elucidate whether the treatment is useful in both anisometropic amblyopia and strabismic amblyopia. In addition, the differences were detected between anisometropic amblyopia and strabismic amblyopia after the same perceptual treatment and whether the suppression in anisometropic amblyopia or strabismic amblyopia could be decreased before and after the treatment.
A binocular perceptual learning was applied for the treatment, the suppression was measured, and the patients were followed up for 2 months after training. Anisometropic amblyopia and strabismic amblyopia groups were subjected to the assessment of stereo, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and suppression before and after the training.
After 6 weeks of "Diploma Gabor Orientation Coherence" training, in the anisometropic amblyopia group, the outcomes of visual acuity (t = 3.114, p = 0.026) and contrast sensitivity (t = 7.786, p = 0.001) were increased significantly. While in the strabismic amblyopia group, the outcomes of stereo (t = 2.987, p = 0.040) and contrast sensitivity (t = 3.638, p = 0.022) were increased significantly.
After Diploma Gabor Orientation Coherence training in the same frequency and in the same duration, the anisometropic amblyopia group got an improvement in visual acuity, but the strabismic amblyopia group got an improvement in stereo. As there are evidences to show that anisometropic amblyopia and strabismic amblyopia were injured in different pathways, we think the diverse results might come from the different pathway injury in anisometropic amblyopia and strabismic amblyopia.
对于超出视力关键期的患者,弱视曾被推测为一种无法治愈的疾病;然而,目前在成人中它是可治疗的。
本研究旨在阐明该治疗方法对屈光参差性弱视和斜视性弱视是否均有效。此外,还检测了相同感知觉治疗后屈光参差性弱视和斜视性弱视之间的差异,以及治疗前后屈光参差性弱视或斜视性弱视中的抑制现象是否能够减轻。
采用双眼感知觉学习进行治疗,测量抑制情况,并在训练后对患者进行2个月的随访。对屈光参差性弱视组和斜视性弱视组在训练前后进行立体视觉、视力、对比敏感度和抑制情况的评估。
经过6周的“视标加博尔方向相干性”训练后,屈光参差性弱视组的视力(t = 3.114,p = 0.026)和对比敏感度(t = 7.786,p = 0.001)结果显著提高。而在斜视性弱视组中,立体视觉(t = 2.987,p = 0.040)和对比敏感度(t = 3.638,p = 0.022)结果显著提高。
在相同频率和相同时长的视标加博尔方向相干性训练后,屈光参差性弱视组的视力得到改善,而斜视性弱视组的立体视觉得到改善。由于有证据表明屈光参差性弱视和斜视性弱视的损伤途径不同,我们认为不同的结果可能源于屈光参差性弱视和斜视性弱视不同的途径损伤。