Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, the Netherlands.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, the Netherlands.
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Jul;90:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
This study explored the impact of motivation on the memory for delayed intentions (so-called, prospective memory, PM) in autistic individuals. Specifically, we were interested in the effects of personal (i.e., receiving a reward) as compared to social motivation (i.e., performing a favour for someone). Given the well-established theory of mind deficits in autism, we expected autistic individuals to benefit more strongly from personal than social importance manipulations, whereas the opposite pattern was predicted for controls. Sixty-one adolescents with autism and 61 typically developing adolescents participated, with each group distributed equally to one of the three motivation conditions of standard, social and personal reward. Participants worked on a 2-back picture-based ongoing task in which a time-based PM task was embedded. A mixed 2 (Group) x 3 (Motivation condition) analysis of covariance with age, verbal and non-verbal abilities as covariates and correct PM responses as dependent variable indicated solely a main effect of group, with controls outperforming the autism group. In contrast to our expectations, there was no main effect of condition, no significant interaction, and none of the covariates had any significant impact. However, further planned analyses revealed that controls only outperformed autistic individuals in the personal reward condition. Controls performed significantly best when a personal reward was promised, whereas there were no significant differences between the motivation conditions for autistic individuals. Findings are discussed in terms of underlying processes.
本研究探讨了动机对自闭症个体延迟意图记忆(即所谓的前瞻性记忆,PM)的影响。具体而言,我们对个人动机(即获得奖励)与社会动机(即帮助他人)的影响感兴趣。鉴于自闭症中已经确立的心理理论缺陷理论,我们预计自闭症个体将从个人重要性的操纵中受益更大,而对照组则预测相反的模式。61 名自闭症青少年和 61 名典型发展青少年参与了研究,每个组都均等分配到标准、社会和个人奖励这三种动机条件中的一种。参与者在一个基于图片的 2 位连续任务中工作,其中嵌入了基于时间的 PM 任务。在对年龄、言语和非言语能力作为协变量以及正确 PM 反应作为因变量进行混合 2(组)x3(动机条件)协方差分析中,仅发现组的主要效应,对照组的表现优于自闭症组。与我们的预期相反,没有条件的主要效应,没有显著的相互作用,而且没有一个协变量有任何显著影响。然而,进一步的计划分析表明,对照组仅在个人奖励条件下优于自闭症个体。当承诺个人奖励时,对照组的表现明显更好,而自闭症个体在动机条件之间没有显著差异。研究结果从潜在过程的角度进行了讨论。