SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Bezuidenhoutseweg 62, 2509 AC The Hague, the Netherlands.
Vias Institute, Chaussée de Haecht/Haachtsesteenweg 1405, 1130 Brussels, Belgium.
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
The aim of this paper is to update the most recent published evidence on road safety estimates of recent red light camera (RLC) and speed/red light camera studies (SRLC). A literature search was carried out on RLC studies in the period 2013-2017 which, after screening, identified 18 recent studies on red light cameras (RLCs) and speed/red light cameras (SRLCs). The methodology and results of these studies were further examined and summary safety estimates were derived and compared to earlier meta-analysis summary estimates. The primary conclusion is that the new safety estimates from this paper show a 12% decrease of total crashes and confirm the general tendency of RLCs to reduce right angle crashes while at the same time increasing rear-end crashes. However, comparing the developments over time, the review reveals that safety estimates tend to increase with time (the safety effects of the most recent studies are the greatest). Also safety estimates suggest more positive effects with SRLCs than with RLCs. Most of recent studies indicate that spillover effects are present and can be quite substantial.
本文旨在更新最近发表的关于道路交通安全性的最新证据，包括最近的红灯摄像头（RLC）和速度/红灯摄像头研究（SRLC）的估计。对 2013 年至 2017 年期间的 RLC 研究进行了文献检索，经过筛选，确定了 18 项关于红灯摄像头（RLC）和速度/红灯摄像头（SRLC）的最新研究。进一步检查了这些研究的方法和结果，并得出了总结安全性估计值，并与早期的荟萃分析总结估计值进行了比较。主要结论是，本文的新安全性估计值表明总事故减少了 12％，并证实了 RLC 减少直角事故的总体趋势，同时增加了追尾事故。但是，随着时间的推移进行比较，综述揭示了安全性估计值随着时间的推移而增加（最新研究的安全性效果最大）。此外，安全性估计值表明 SRLC 的效果比 RLC 更积极。最近的大多数研究表明存在溢出效应，而且可能相当可观。
