Kehl Debora, Generali Melanie, Mallone Anna, Heller Manfred, Uldry Anne-Christine, Cheng Phil, Gantenbein Benjamin, Hoerstrup Simon P, Weber Benedikt
1Institute for Regenerative Medicine (IREM), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
2Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Core Facility, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
NPJ Regen Med. 2019 Apr 16;4:8. doi: 10.1038/s41536-019-0070-y. eCollection 2019.
Human mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) secretomes have shown to influence the microenvironment upon injury, promoting cytoprotection, angiogenesis, and tissue repair. The angiogenic potential is of particular interest for the treatment of ischemic diseases. Interestingly, hMSC secretomes isolated from different tissue sources have shown dissimilarities with respect to their angiogenic profile. This study compares angiogenesis of hMSC secretomes from adipose tissue (hADSCs), bone marrow (hBMSCs), and umbilical cord Wharton's jelly (hWJSCs). hMSC secretomes were obtained under xenofree conditions and analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS). Biological processes related to angiogenesis were found to be enriched in the proteomic profile of hMSC secretomes. hWJSC secretomes revealed a more complete angiogenic network with higher concentrations of angiogenesis related proteins, followed by hBMSC secretomes. hADSC secretomes lacked central angiogenic proteins and expressed most detected proteins to a significantly lower level. In vivo all secretomes induced vascularization of subcutaneously implanted Matrigel plugs in mice. Differences in secretome composition were functionally analyzed with monocyte and endothelial cell (EC) in vitro co-culture experiments using vi-SNE based multidimensional flow cytometry data analysis. Functional responses between hBMSC and hWJSC secretomes were comparable, with significantly higher migration of CD14 CD16 monocytes and enhanced macrophage differentiation compared with hADSC secretomes. Both secretomes also induced a more profound pro-angiogenic phenotype of ECs. These results suggest hWJSCs secretome as the most potent hMSC source for inflammation-mediated angiogenesis induction, while the potency of hADSC secretomes was lowest. This systematic analysis may have implication on the selection of hMSCs for future clinical studies.
人间充质基质细胞(hMSC)分泌组已显示出在损伤时会影响微环境,促进细胞保护、血管生成和组织修复。血管生成潜力对于缺血性疾病的治疗尤为重要。有趣的是,从不同组织来源分离的hMSC分泌组在其血管生成谱方面表现出差异。本研究比较了来自脂肪组织(hADSCs)、骨髓(hBMSCs)和脐带华通氏胶(hWJSCs)的hMSC分泌组的血管生成情况。hMSC分泌组在无动物源条件下获得,并通过液相色谱串联质谱(LC/MS-MS)进行分析。发现与血管生成相关的生物学过程在hMSC分泌组的蛋白质组学谱中富集。hWJSC分泌组显示出更完整的血管生成网络,具有更高浓度的血管生成相关蛋白,其次是hBMSC分泌组。hADSC分泌组缺乏核心血管生成蛋白,且大多数检测到的蛋白表达水平显著较低。在体内,所有分泌组均诱导了小鼠皮下植入的基质胶栓的血管化。使用基于vi-SNE的多维流式细胞术数据分析,通过单核细胞和内皮细胞(EC)体外共培养实验对分泌组组成的差异进行了功能分析。hBMSC和hWJSC分泌组之间的功能反应具有可比性,与hADSC分泌组相比,CD14 CD16单核细胞的迁移显著更高,巨噬细胞分化增强。两种分泌组还诱导了ECs更显著的促血管生成表型。这些结果表明,hWJSCs分泌组是炎症介导的血管生成诱导中最有效的hMSC来源,而hADSC分泌组的效力最低。这种系统分析可能对未来临床研究中hMSCs的选择具有启示意义。