Suppr超能文献

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠状动脉分叉病变患者的影响。

Effects of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

作者信息

Zheng Wei, Li Youmei, Tian Jingdu, Li Lufeng, Xie Li, Mao Qi, Tong Wuyang, Zhou Denglu, Azzalini Lorenzo, Zhao Xiaohui

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.

Division of Interventional Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20100, Italy.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 20;2019:3170957. doi: 10.1155/2019/3170957. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions can potentially lead to higher risk of ischemic events than the nonbifurcation ones, thus calling for further optimization of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes from ticagrelor and clopidogrel in bifurcation lesions patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. A total of 553 patients discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel combined with aspirin were recruited for 1-year follow-up. The incidences of primary endpoint (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]: a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction [MI] or stroke), secondary endpoints (the individual component of the primary endpoint or definite/probable stent thrombosis), and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]≥3 bleeding events) were evaluated. To minimize the selection bias, a propensity score-matched population analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

The risks of both primary endpoint (8.15% and 12.01% for the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively; adjusted hazards ratio [HR]: 0.488, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.277-0.861, P=0.013) and MI (4.44% and 8.48% for the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively; adjusted HR: 0.341, 95% CI: 0.162-0.719, P=0.005) were significantly reduced in the ticagrelor group as compared with those of the clopidogrel counterpart, whereas the risk of major bleeding was comparable (2.96% and 2.47% for the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively; adjusted HR: 0.972, 95% CI: 0.321-2.941, P=0.960). Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed such findings.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with bifurcation lesions after PCI, ticagrelor treatment shows lower MACE and MI rates than the clopidogrel one, along with comparable major bleeding.

摘要

背景

与非分叉病变相比,经皮治疗冠状动脉分叉病变可能导致更高的缺血事件风险,因此需要进一步优化双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)。本研究旨在比较替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的分叉病变患者中的临床结局。

方法

我们对冠状动脉分叉病变患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。共招募了553例出院时接受替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗的患者进行为期1年的随访。评估主要终点(主要不良心血管事件 [MACE]:心脏死亡、心肌梗死 [MI] 或中风的复合事件)、次要终点(主要终点的各个组成部分或明确/可能的支架血栓形成)和大出血(出血学术研究联盟 [BARC]≥3级出血事件)的发生率。为尽量减少选择偏倚,还进行了倾向评分匹配人群分析。

结果

与氯吡格雷组相比,替格瑞洛组的主要终点风险(替格瑞洛组和氯吡格雷组分别为8.15%和12.01%;调整后风险比 [HR]:0.488,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.277 - 0.861,P = 0.013)和MI风险(替格瑞洛组和氯吡格雷组分别为4.44%和8.48%;调整后HR:0.341,95% CI:0.162 - 0.719,P = 0.005)均显著降低,而大出血风险相当(替格瑞洛组和氯吡格雷组分别为2.96%和2.47%;调整后HR:0.972,95% CI:0.321 - 2.941,P = 0.960)。倾向评分匹配分析证实了这些发现。

结论

对于PCI术后分叉病变患者,替格瑞洛治疗的MACE和MI发生率低于氯吡格雷治疗,且大出血发生率相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f9/6448338/227acaf41b2a/BMRI2019-3170957.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验