College of Life Science and Biopharmaceutical, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Cardiology. 2023;148(4):363-373. doi: 10.1159/000530602. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
The treatment strategy for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor has been controversial in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our meta-analysis aimed to demonstrate whether intensified antithrombotic regimens with ticagrelor plus aspirin have more beneficial effects and fewer adverse events compared to those of clopidogrel plus aspirin in East Asian patients with ACS undergoing PCI.
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of DAPT with ticagrelor or clopidogrel plus aspirin for secondary prevention of ACS in East Asian patients undergoing PCI. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the metrics of choice for assessing treatment effects. The primary endpoint was bleeding events, and the secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], and stroke), all-cause death, and definite/probable/possible stent thrombosis. The I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity.
Six RCTs involving a total of 2,725 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of all bleeding events with ticagrelor was higher than that with clopidogrel (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.31-2.07), but the incidence of MACCE was not significantly different between the two groups (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.54-2.16). All-cause death (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.67-1.79), cardiovascular death (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.68-2.98), nonfatal MI (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.48-1.78), stroke (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.40-2.50), and stent thrombosis (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.19-2.98) were not statistically different between the two groups.
Ticagrelor increased the risk of bleeding and did not increase treatment efficacy compared to that of clopidogrel in the East Asian population who have ACS treated with PCI.
替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在东亚经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中的治疗策略一直存在争议。我们的荟萃分析旨在证明与氯吡格雷加阿司匹林相比,替格瑞洛加阿司匹林的强化抗血栓形成方案在东亚 ACS 接受 PCI 的患者中是否具有更有益的效果和更少的不良事件。
我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、临床试验、 Cochrane 图书馆和中国临床试验注册中心,以查找比较替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷加阿司匹林用于东亚 PCI 后 ACS 二级预防的 DAPT 疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)被用作评估治疗效果的首选指标。主要终点是出血事件,次要终点是主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE,包括心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死[MI]和中风)、全因死亡和确定/可能/可能的支架血栓形成。I2 指数用于评估异质性。
六项纳入了总共 2725 名患者的 RCT 符合纳入标准。替格瑞洛组所有出血事件的发生率高于氯吡格雷组(RR,1.65;95%CI,1.31-2.07),但两组的 MACCE 发生率无显著差异(RR,1.08;95%CI,0.54-2.16)。全因死亡(RR,1.10;95%CI,0.67-1.79)、心血管死亡(RR,1.42;95%CI,0.68-2.98)、非致死性 MI(RR,0.92;95%CI,0.48-1.78)、中风(RR,1.00;95%CI,0.40-2.50)和支架血栓形成(RR,0.76;95%CI,0.19-2.98)在两组间无统计学差异。
替格瑞洛在东亚经 PCI 治疗的 ACS 患者中增加了出血风险,且与氯吡格雷相比并未增加治疗效果。