Varlamos Charalampos, Lianos Ioannis, Benetou Despoina-Rafailia, Alexopoulos Dimitrios
Second Department of Cardiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School Athens, Greece.
US Cardiol. 2021 Jun 14;15:e11. doi: 10.15420/usc.2020.34. eCollection 2021.
Revascularization of both left main and bifurcation lesions is currently considered an important feature of complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whereas stenting distal left main bifurcation is fairly challenging. Recent evidence shows that such lesions are associated with an increased risk of ischemic events. There is no universal consensus on the optimal PCI strategy or the appropriate type and duration of antithrombotic therapy to mitigate the thrombotic risk. Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy or use of more potent P2Y inhibitors have been investigated in the context of this high-risk subset of the population undergoing PCI. Thus, while complex PCI is a growing field in interventional cardiology, left main and bifurcation PCI constitutes a fair amount of the total complex procedures performed recently, and there is cumulative interest regarding antithrombotic therapy type and duration in this subset of patients, with decision-making mostly based on clinical presentation, baseline bleeding, and ischemic risk, as well as the performed stenting strategy.
目前,左主干和分叉病变的血运重建被视为复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的一个重要特征,而左主干分叉远端的支架置入颇具挑战性。最近的证据表明,此类病变与缺血事件风险增加相关。对于最佳PCI策略或减轻血栓形成风险的抗栓治疗的适当类型和持续时间,尚无普遍共识。在接受PCI的这一高风险人群中,已经对延长双联抗血小板治疗或使用更强效的P2Y抑制剂进行了研究。因此,虽然复杂PCI在介入心脏病学领域不断发展,但左主干和分叉PCI在近期进行的复杂手术中占了相当比例,并且对于该类患者抗栓治疗的类型和持续时间一直存在持续关注,决策主要基于临床表现、基线出血和缺血风险以及所采用的支架置入策略。