Nissen L, Winther S, Westra J, Ejlersen J A, Isaksen C, Rossi A, Holm N R, Urbonaviciene G, Gormsen L C, Madsen L H, Christiansen E H, Maeng M, Knudsen L L, Frost L, Brix L, Bøtker H E, Petersen S E, Bøttcher M
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Unit West Jutland, Gl. Landevej 61, Herning, 7400, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep;35(9):1709-1720. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01604-x. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
We aimed to identify factors influencing the sensitivity of perfusion imaging after an initial positive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with conditional fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference. Secondly we aimed to identify factors associated with revascularisation and to evaluate treatment outcome after ICA. We analysed 292 consecutive patients with suspected significant coronary artery disease (CAD) at CCTA, who underwent perfusion imaging with either cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) followed by ICA with conditional FFR. Stratified analysis and uni- and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of diagnostic agreement between perfusion scans and ICA and predictors of revascularisation. Myocardial ischemia evaluated with perfusion scans was present in 65/292 (22%) while 117/292 (40%) had obstructive CAD evaluated by ICA. Revascularisation rate was 90/292 (31%). The overall sensitivity for perfusion scans was 39% (30-48), specificity 89% (83-93), PPV 69% (57-80) and NPV 68% (62-74). Stratified analysis showed higher sensitivities in patients with multi-vessel disease at CCTA 49% (37-60) and typical chest pain 50% (37-60). Predictors of revascularisation were multi-vessel disease by CCTA (OR 3.51 [1.91-6.48]) and a positive perfusion scan (OR 4.69 [2.49-8.83]). The sensitivity for perfusion scans after CCTA was highest in patients with typical angina and multiple lesions at CCTA and predicted diagnostic agreement between perfusion scans and ICA. Abnormal perfusion and multi vessel disease at CCTA predicted revascularisation.
我们旨在确定在初始冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)呈阳性后,以有条件的血流储备分数(FFR)的侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)为参考,影响灌注成像敏感性的因素。其次,我们旨在确定与血运重建相关的因素,并评估ICA后的治疗结果。我们分析了292例在CCTA时疑似患有严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的连续患者,这些患者接受了心脏磁共振(CMR)或心肌灌注闪烁显像(MPS)的灌注成像,随后进行了有条件FFR的ICA。进行了分层分析以及单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定灌注扫描与ICA之间诊断一致性的预测因素以及血运重建的预测因素。经灌注扫描评估存在心肌缺血的患者有65/292(22%),而经ICA评估有阻塞性CAD的患者有117/292(40%)。血运重建率为90/292(31%)。灌注扫描的总体敏感性为39%(30 - 48),特异性为89%(83 - 93),阳性预测值为69%(57 - 80),阴性预测值为68%(62 - 74)。分层分析显示,CCTA显示多支血管病变的患者敏感性较高,为49%(37 - 60),有典型胸痛的患者敏感性为50%(37 - 60)。血运重建的预测因素为CCTA显示的多支血管病变(比值比3.51 [1.91 - 6.48])和灌注扫描阳性(比值比4.69 [2.49 - 8.83])。CCTA后灌注扫描的敏感性在有典型心绞痛且CCTA有多个病变的患者中最高,并且预测了灌注扫描与ICA之间诊断的一致性。CCTA时灌注异常和多支血管病变预测了血运重建。