• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植后新发生的右束支传导阻滞与移植物排斥反应的关联

Association of Newly Developed Right Bundle Branch Block with Graft Rejection Following Heart Transplantation.

作者信息

Kim Jin Ho, Oh Jaewon, Kim Min Ji, Kim In Cheol, Uhm Jae Sun, Pak Hui Nam, Kang Seok Min

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Departement of Cardiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2019 May;60(5):423-428. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.5.423.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2019.60.5.423
PMID:31016903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6479131/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to examine associations between right bundle branch block (RBBB) following heart transplantation (HT) and graft rejection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated 51 patients who underwent endomyocardial biopsies, electrocardiogram, right-side cardiac catheterization, and echocardiography at 1 month and 1 year after HT. We classified patients into four groups according to the development of RBBB, based on electrocardiogram at 1 month and 1 year: 1) sustained RBBB, 2) disappeared RBBB, 3) newly developed RBBB, and 4) sustained non-RBBB. The RBBB was defined as an RSR' pattern in V1 with a QRS duration ≥100 ms on electrocardiogram.

RESULTS

The newly developed RBBB group (n=13, 25.5%) had a higher rate of new onset graft rejection (from grade 0 to grade ≥1R, 30.8% vs. 10.0% vs. 21.4%, =0.042) at 1 year, compared with sustained RBBB (n=10, 19.6%) and sustained non-RBBB group (n=28, 54.9%). In contrast, the incidence of resolved graft rejection (from grade ≥1R to grade 0) was higher in the sustained RBBB group than the newly developed RBBB and sustained non-RBBB groups (70.0% vs. 7.7% vs. 25.0%, =0.042). Left atrial volume index was significantly higher in the newly developed RBBB group than the sustained RBBB and sustained non-RBBB groups (60.6±25.9 mL/m² vs. 36.0±11.0 mL/m² vs. 38.4±18.1 mL/m², =0.003).

CONCLUSION

Close monitoring for new development of RBBB at 1 year after HT, which was associated with a higher incidence of new onset graft rejection, may be helpful to identify high risk patients for graft rejection.

摘要

目的

我们旨在研究心脏移植(HT)后右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)与移植物排斥反应之间的关联。

材料与方法

我们调查了51例在HT后1个月和1年接受心内膜心肌活检、心电图、右侧心导管检查和超声心动图检查的患者。根据1个月和1年时的心电图RBBB发生情况,将患者分为四组:1)持续性RBBB,2)消失性RBBB,3)新发生的RBBB,4)持续性非RBBB。RBBB在心电图上定义为V1导联呈RSR′型且QRS时限≥100 ms。

结果

与持续性RBBB组(n = 10,19.6%)和持续性非RBBB组(n = 28,54.9%)相比,新发生的RBBB组(n = 13,25.5%)在1年时新发移植物排斥反应的发生率更高(从0级到≥1R级,30.8%对10.0%对21.4%,P = 0.042)。相反,持续性RBBB组移植物排斥反应缓解(从≥1R级到0级)的发生率高于新发生的RBBB组和持续性非RBBB组(70.0%对7.7%对25.0%,P = 0.042)。新发生的RBBB组的左心房容积指数显著高于持续性RBBB组和持续性非RBBB组(60.6±25.9 mL/m²对36.0±11.0 mL/m²对38.4±18.1 mL/m²,P = 0.003)。

结论

HT后1年密切监测RBBB的新发生情况,其与新发移植物排斥反应的较高发生率相关,可能有助于识别移植物排斥反应的高危患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b528/6479131/ca642ed8c9cb/ymj-60-423-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b528/6479131/ca642ed8c9cb/ymj-60-423-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b528/6479131/ca642ed8c9cb/ymj-60-423-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Newly Developed Right Bundle Branch Block with Graft Rejection Following Heart Transplantation.心脏移植后新发生的右束支传导阻滞与移植物排斥反应的关联
Yonsei Med J. 2019 May;60(5):423-428. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.5.423.
2
The surface electrocardiogram predicts risk of heart block during right heart catheterization in patients with preexisting left bundle branch block: implications for the definition of complete left bundle branch block.体表心电图预测左束支阻滞患者行右心导管检查时发生心脏阻滞的风险:对完全性左束支阻滞定义的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Jul;21(7):781-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01714.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
Electrocardiographic features and prevalence of bilateral bundle-branch delay.心电图特征与双侧束支传导阻滞的患病率。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;7(4):640-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000999. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
4
Novel ECG criteria for right ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with right bundle branch block.新型心电图标准诊断右束支传导阻滞患者右心室收缩功能障碍。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 20;167(4):1385-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.025. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
5
Effect on cardiac function of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with right bundle branch block (from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT] trial).右束支传导阻滞患者心脏再同步治疗对心功能的影响(来自多中心自动除颤器植入伴心脏再同步治疗试验[MADIT-CRT])。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 15;112(4):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 May 29.
6
Left ventricular regional contraction abnormalities by echocardiographic speckle tracking in combined right bundle branch with left anterior fascicular block compared to left bundle branch block.与左束支传导阻滞相比,经超声心动图斑点追踪技术检测发现,合并右束支传导阻滞与左前分支传导阻滞时左心室局部收缩异常情况。
J Electrocardiol. 2016 May-Jun;49(3):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
7
Clinical Impact of Baseline Right Bundle Branch Block in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者基线右束支传导阻滞的临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1564-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
Comparison of left ventricular torsion and strain with biventricular pacing in patients with underlying right bundle branch block versus those with left bundle branch block.潜在右束支传导阻滞患者与左束支传导阻滞患者双心室起搏时左心室扭转和应变的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 1;115(7):918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
9
Evolution of right bundle branch block and other intraventricular conduction abnormalities in the transplanted human heart.移植人心脏中右束支传导阻滞及其他室内传导异常的演变
Jpn Circ J. 1990 Sep;54(9):1122-9. doi: 10.1253/jcj.54.1122.
10
Effects of right bundle branch block during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.房室结折返性心动过速期间右束支传导阻滞的影响
Int J Cardiol. 2005 May 11;101(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.06.010.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of the electrocardiogram in the recognition of cardiac transplant rejection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心电图在心脏移植排斥反应识别中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Mar;45(3):258-264. doi: 10.1002/clc.23783. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
2
Newly acquired complete right bundle branch block early after heart transplantation is associated with lower survival.心脏移植后早期新发完全性右束支传导阻滞与生存率降低相关。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3737-3747. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13494. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
3
Post-transplant absolute lymphocyte count predicts early cytomegalovirus infection after heart transplantation.

本文引用的文献

1
Lower frequency routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies after heart transplantation.心脏移植后较低频率的常规监测心内膜心肌活检
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0182880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182880. eCollection 2017.
2
Paroxysmal atrioventricular block after heart transplantation in children: an early sign of rejection?儿童心脏移植后阵发性房室传导阻滞:排斥反应的早期迹象?
Pediatr Transplant. 2016 Dec;20(8):1164-1167. doi: 10.1111/petr.12832. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
3
Interventricular conduction disorders after orthotopic heart transplantation: risk factors and clinical relevance.
移植后绝对淋巴细胞计数可预测心脏移植后早期巨细胞病毒感染。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80790-4.
原位心脏移植术后的心室传导障碍:危险因素及临床意义。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017 May;22(3). doi: 10.1111/anec.12402. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
4
Prolonged PR interval, first-degree heart block and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PR间期延长、一度房室传导阻滞与不良心血管结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Heart. 2016 May;102(9):672-80. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308956. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
5
Prognostic significance of prolonged PR interval in the general population.一般人群中 PR 间期延长的预后意义。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(2):123-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht176. Epub 2013 May 14.
6
Cellular rejection of the conduction system after orthotopic heart transplantation for congenital atrioventricular block.先天性房室传导阻滞原位心脏移植后传导系统的细胞性排斥反应。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Nov;25(11):1371-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
7
Prevalence, patterns of development, and prognosis of right bundle branch block in heart transplant recipients.心脏移植受者右束支传导阻滞的患病率、发展模式及预后
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 1;98(9):1288-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.018. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
8
Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.心腔定量推荐:美国超声心动图学会指南与标准委员会及心腔定量写作组的报告,与欧洲心脏病学会下属分支欧洲超声心动图协会联合制定。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005.
9
Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.1990年心脏排斥反应诊断命名标准化工作方案的修订版。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1710-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.03.019. Epub 2005 Jun 20.
10
Late pacemaker requirement after pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation may predict the presence of transplant coronary artery disease.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004 Jan;23(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(03)00058-5.