Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Met-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Sep;98(9):1187-1194. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13629. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
This study aims to investigate the use of oxytocin augmentation during labor in nulliparous women following Zhang's guideline or the WHO partograph.
This is a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial in 14 birth-care units in Norway, randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which followed Zhang's guideline, or to the control group, which followed the WHO partograph, for labor progression. The participants were nulliparous women who had a singleton full-term fetus in a cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labor, denoted as group 1 in the Ten Group Classification System.
Between December 2014 and January 2017, 7277 participants were included. A total of 3219 women (44%) received augmentation with oxytocin during labor. Oxytocin was used in 1658 (42%) women in the Zhang group compared with 1561 (47%) women in the WHO group. The adjusted relative risk for augmentation with oxytocin was 0.98 (95% CI 0.84-1.15; P = .8) in the Zhang vs WHO group, with an adjusted risk difference of -0.8% (95% CI -7.8 to 6.1). The participants in the Zhang group were less likely to be augmented with oxytocin before reaching 6 cm of cervical dilatation (24%) compared with participants in the WHO group (28%), with an adjusted relative risk of 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.94; P = .003). Oxytocin was administered for almost 20 min longer in the Zhang group than in the WHO group, with an adjusted mean difference of 17.9 min (95% CI 2.7-33.1; P = .021). In addition, 19% of the women in the Zhang group and 23% in the WHO group received augmentation with oxytocin without being diagnosed with labor dystocia.
Although no significant difference in the proportion of oxytocin augmentation was observed between the 2 study groups, there were differences in how oxytocin was used. Women in the Zhang group were less likely to receive oxytocin augmentation before 6 cm of cervical dilatation. The duration of augmentation with oxytocin was longer in the Zhang group than in the WHO group.
本研究旨在调查在遵循张指南或世卫组织产程图的初产妇中,产程中使用催产素的情况。
这是在挪威 14 个分娩护理单位进行的一项集群随机对照试验的二次分析,这些单位被随机分配到干预组(遵循张指南)或对照组(遵循世卫组织产程图),以监测产程进展。参与者为初产妇,单胎足月胎儿头位,自然临产,在 Ten Group Classification System 中被归为第 1 组。
2014 年 12 月至 2017 年 1 月期间,共纳入 7277 名参与者。共有 3219 名妇女(44%)在分娩过程中接受了催产素的加强治疗。在张组中,有 1658 名(42%)妇女使用了催产素,而在世卫组织组中,有 1561 名(47%)妇女使用了催产素。张组与世卫组织组相比,使用催产素加强治疗的调整后相对风险为 0.98(95%CI 0.84-1.15;P=0.8),调整后风险差异为-0.8%(95%CI -7.8 至 6.1)。与世卫组织组相比,张组中在达到 6cm 宫颈扩张前使用催产素的可能性较小(24%),调整后相对风险为 0.84(95%CI 0.75-0.94;P=0.003)。与世卫组织组相比,张组中催产素的使用时间延长了近 20 分钟,调整后的平均差异为 17.9 分钟(95%CI 2.7-33.1;P=0.021)。此外,张组中有 19%的妇女和世卫组织组中有 23%的妇女在未诊断为产程困难的情况下接受了催产素加强治疗。
尽管两组研究中催产素加强治疗的比例没有显著差异,但催产素的使用方式存在差异。张组的妇女在宫颈扩张 6cm 之前不太可能接受催产素加强治疗。与世卫组织组相比,张组中催产素加强治疗的持续时间更长。