Suppr超能文献

甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术后的疼痛管理综述。

A Review of Postoperative Pain Management for Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, Texas.

Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, Texas.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.050. Epub 2019 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perioperative opioid use has been linked to abuse potential by patients, leading surgeons to scrutinize their postoperative prescribing practices. The goal of the study was to review analgesic regimens for patients undergoing thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy and extrapolate changes that could be made to decrease opioid use while maintaining adequate pain control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was performed. Inclusion criteria were studies 1) written in English, 2) published within the last 20 years, and 3) that included human subjects. Exclusion criteria were studies that 1) evaluated anesthesia regimens exclusively, 2) compared surgical approaches and their effects on pain (e.g., open neck exposure vs. transoral route for thyroidectomy), or 3) included patients undergoing concurrent lateral neck dissection. Of 951 studies originally identified, 10 studies met the criteria.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified, and each evaluated a different analgesic regimen. Five of the studies found a decrease in pain with multimodal regimens. Of the remaining studies, three found no difference in pain control, one found an increase in pain when only an opioid patient-controlled analgesia was used, and one found that 93% of patients required less than 20 oral morphine equivalents postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no postoperative analgesic regimen that has been established as optimal for patients undergoing parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy in the current medical literature. However, half of the studies included in this review found that nonopioid adjuncts decreased patients' need for postoperative opioids.

摘要

背景

围手术期阿片类药物的使用与患者的滥用潜力有关,这导致外科医生仔细审查他们的术后处方实践。本研究的目的是回顾甲状腺切除术和甲状旁腺切除术患者的镇痛方案,并推断出可以减少阿片类药物使用而同时保持足够疼痛控制的改变。

材料和方法

进行了文献回顾。纳入标准为:1)用英文书写的研究,2)发表于过去 20 年内,3)包含人类受试者。排除标准为:1)仅评估麻醉方案的研究,2)比较手术方法及其对疼痛的影响(例如甲状腺切除术的开放颈部暴露与经口途径)的研究,或 3)包括同时进行颈侧部清扫的患者的研究。在最初确定的 951 项研究中,有 10 项研究符合标准。

结果

确定了 10 项研究,每项研究都评估了不同的镇痛方案。其中 5 项研究发现多模式方案可降低疼痛。在其余的研究中,有 3 项研究发现疼痛控制无差异,1 项研究发现仅使用阿片类药物患者自控镇痛时疼痛增加,1 项研究发现 93%的患者术后需要的口服吗啡等效物少于 20 个。

结论

在当前的医学文献中,没有一种术后镇痛方案被确定为甲状旁腺切除术和甲状腺切除术患者的最佳方案。然而,本综述中纳入的半数研究发现,非阿片类药物辅助药物可减少患者对术后阿片类药物的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验