Suppr超能文献

反应格式而非语义激活影响失败检索效应。

Response Format, Not Semantic Activation, Influences the Failed Retrieval Effect.

作者信息

Tanaka Saeko, Miyatani Makoto, Iwaki Nobuyoshi

机构信息

Department of Childhood Education, Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima, Japan.

Department of Psychology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 4;10:599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00599. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

In educational settings, tests are mainly used to measure the extent to which learners' knowledge and skill have been acquired. However, the act of taking a test also promotes learning . In particular, making errors on tests (i.e., searching for erroneous information) promotes learning. This is called the "failed retrieval effect" (FRE) and has been the subject of considerable study. Previous research shows that enhanced learning does not occur if feedback correcting an error is delayed. This is attributed to the relative absence of activated information. In this study, we manipulated both the amount of information to be retrieved prior to learning and the delay time until feedback is given to investigate their effects on learning. As a result, even when multiple incorrect answers were given to increase the degree of semantic activation, learning was not promoted beyond that found with traditional procedures that rely on only one incorrect response. The timing of feedback (immediate, short-delay, long-delay) also did not impact FRE. However, the manipulation of response format for erroneous information resulted in degraded performance when responses were typed and feedback was delayed. Based on this result, we suggested that the failed retrieval effect was not affected by semantic activation at the time of retrieval but was affected by response format. Moreover, the processing necessary for typing may affect FRE under the delayed feedback condition.

摘要

在教育环境中,测试主要用于衡量学习者知识和技能的掌握程度。然而,参加测试这一行为本身也能促进学习。特别是在测试中犯错(即寻找错误信息)能够促进学习。这被称为“失败检索效应”(FRE),并且已经成为大量研究的主题。先前的研究表明,如果纠正错误的反馈延迟,增强学习效果就不会出现。这归因于激活信息的相对缺乏。在本研究中,我们操纵了学习前需要检索的信息量以及给予反馈前的延迟时间,以研究它们对学习的影响。结果,即使给出多个错误答案以增加语义激活程度,学习效果也不会比仅依赖一个错误回答的传统程序更好。反馈的时机(即时、短延迟、长延迟)也不会影响失败检索效应。然而,当错误信息的回答格式被操纵,且回答为打字输入且反馈延迟时,表现会下降。基于这一结果,我们认为失败检索效应不受检索时语义激活的影响,而是受回答格式的影响。此外,在延迟反馈条件下,打字所需的处理过程可能会影响失败检索效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a963/6459060/a4535a4f61fb/fpsyg-10-00599-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验