Lehman Melissa, Karpicke Jeffrey D
Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, Lynn University.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(10):1573-1591. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000267. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
The elaborative retrieval account of retrieval-based learning proposes that retrieval enhances retention because the retrieval process produces the generation of semantic mediators that link cues to target information. We tested 2 assumptions that form the basis of this account: that semantic mediators are more likely to be generated during retrieval than during restudy and that the generation of mediators facilitates later recall of targets. Although these assumptions are often discussed in the context of retrieval processes, we noted that there was little prior empirical evidence to support either assumption. We conducted a series of experiments to measure the generation of mediators during retrieval and restudy and to examine the effect of the generation of mediators on later target recall. Across 7 experiments, we found that the generation of mediators was not more likely during retrieval (and may be more likely during restudy), and that the activation of mediators was unrelated to subsequent free recall of targets and was negatively related to cued recall of targets. The results pose challenges for both assumptions of the elaborative retrieval account. (PsycINFO Database Record
基于检索的学习的精细化检索观点认为,检索能增强记忆保持,因为检索过程会产生将线索与目标信息联系起来的语义中介。我们检验了构成该观点基础的两个假设:与重新学习相比,语义中介在检索过程中更有可能产生,且中介的产生有助于随后对目标的回忆。尽管这些假设经常在检索过程的背景下进行讨论,但我们注意到几乎没有先前的实证证据支持这两个假设。我们进行了一系列实验,以测量检索和重新学习过程中中介的产生,并检验中介的产生对随后目标回忆的影响。在7个实验中,我们发现中介的产生在检索过程中并非更有可能(且在重新学习过程中可能更有可能),并且中介的激活与随后目标的自由回忆无关,而与目标的线索回忆呈负相关。这些结果对精细化检索观点的两个假设都提出了挑战。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )