Golfieri Rita, Bargellini Irene, Spreafico Carlo, Trevisani Franco
Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Interventional Radiology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Liver Cancer. 2019 Mar;8(2):78-91. doi: 10.1159/000489791. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate and advanced stages (BCLC B and C) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) both include heterogeneous populations. Patients classified as BCLC stage B present with different tumour burdens, and the recommended treatment is transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). A similar heterogeneity of tumour burden and liver function can be found among patients classified as BCLC stage C, which includes diverse clinical features (performance status [PS] 1-2), macrovascular invasion (MVI) including portal vein tumour (PVT) thrombosis, and/or extra-hepatic spread. Nonetheless, the anti-tumoural treatment formally recommended by Western guidelines is systemic therapy with sorafenib.
Several proposals of subclassification for both these stages have been suggested in recent years, differentiating the more appropriate treatments for each substage. In particular, for BCLC stage C patients with PVT, therapeutic indications, clinical outcomes, and response to locoregional therapy are notably different in the presence of subsegmental, segmental or main PVT. Accordingly, liver resection and transarterial therapies, such as TACE or transarterial embolization (TAE) and Y-radioembolization (TARE), can be performed in locally advanced HCC with intrahepatic MVI according to its extent. In fact, surgery and TACE/TAE/TARE have no contraindications in the presence of PVT limited to the subsegmental or segmental branches in Child-Pugh class A patients, whereas only TARE should be utilized when there is lobar branch involvement. The presence of PS 1 should not be sufficient to allocate patients to the advanced stage since this would preclude any potential treatment for HCC. Patients should be properly classified as BCLC C only in cases of main portal trunk PVT, and treated according to the guidelines, provided that they belong to Child-Pugh class A.
Subclassifications of BCLC B and C stages are urgently needed and require validation in order to guide clinicians towards the most effective treatment option.
巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)中晚期(BCLC B期和C期)肝细胞癌(HCC)均包含异质性群体。被归类为BCLC B期的患者存在不同的肿瘤负荷,推荐的治疗方法是经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)。在被归类为BCLC C期的患者中也可发现类似的肿瘤负荷和肝功能异质性,该期包括多种临床特征(体能状态[PS] 1 - 2)、大血管侵犯(MVI),包括门静脉肿瘤(PVT)血栓形成和/或肝外转移。尽管如此,西方指南正式推荐的抗肿瘤治疗方法是使用索拉非尼进行全身治疗。
近年来,针对这两个阶段提出了几种亚分类方案,以区分每个亚阶段更合适的治疗方法。特别是,对于伴有PVT的BCLC C期患者,在存在亚段、段或主干PVT的情况下,治疗指征、临床结果以及对局部区域治疗的反应明显不同。因此,根据肝内MVI的程度,可对局部晚期HCC进行肝切除术和经动脉治疗,如TACE或经动脉栓塞术(TAE)以及钇90放射性栓塞术(TARE)。事实上,对于Child-Pugh A级患者,当PVT仅限于亚段或段分支时,手术和TACE/TAE/TARE没有禁忌证,而当存在叶分支受累时,仅应使用TARE。PS 1的存在不应足以将患者归类为晚期,因为这将排除任何针对HCC的潜在治疗方法。仅在主门静脉主干PVT的情况下,患者才应被正确归类为BCLC C期,并根据指南进行治疗,前提是他们属于Child-Pugh A级。
迫切需要对BCLC B期和C期进行亚分类,并需要进行验证,以指导临床医生选择最有效的治疗方案。