• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DNP 项目教师和毕业生对质量改进和安全流程的知识和使用情况。

DNP Program Faculty and Graduates' Knowledge and Use of QI and Safety Processes.

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Associate Professors (Drs Ossege and Tovar), College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington; Assistant Professor (Dr Farus-Brown), Ohio University, School of Nursing, Zanesville; Assistant Professor (Dr Zonsius), College of Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois; Clinical Assistant Professor (Dr Morrow), College of Nursing, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut.

出版信息

Nurse Educ. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):11-16. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000677.

DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000677
PMID:31022071
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Across doctor of nursing practice (DNP) programs, wide variation exists for DNP project expectations and curricular integration of Quality and Safety Education for Nurses competencies.

PURPOSE

This study examined DNP project characteristics and compared knowledge, skills, and attitudes about quality improvement (QI) processes between DNP program faculty and graduates.

METHODS

This descriptive study used a national convenience sample of DNP program faculty and graduates from multiple settings (N = 147) who completed an electronic survey of a modified version of the Quality Improvement Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes Survey.

RESULTS

Most DNP projects were QI/practice improvement (85.5%) and required interprofessional collaboration (65%) and implementation of a practice change (55.8%) with evaluation (65.5%). DNP program faculty (n = 73) and graduates (n = 30) had no significant differences in QI knowledge or skills; faculty reported less confidence in their knowledge (P = .002) and skills (P = .007) than graduates.

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty development efforts to improve QI knowledge and skills for DNP program faculty are needed.

摘要

背景

在不同的护理实践博士(DNP)项目中,DNP 项目的期望以及护士质量和安全教育能力的课程整合存在很大差异。

目的

本研究考察了 DNP 项目的特点,并比较了 DNP 项目教师和毕业生在质量改进(QI)过程方面的知识、技能和态度。

方法

本描述性研究使用了来自多个环境的全国便利样本的 DNP 项目教师和毕业生(N=147),他们完成了一份关于质量改进知识、技能和态度调查的修改版的电子调查。

结果

大多数 DNP 项目都是质量/实践改进(85.5%),需要跨专业协作(65%)和实施实践改变(55.8%),同时进行评估(65.5%)。DNP 项目教师(n=73)和毕业生(n=30)在 QI 知识或技能方面没有显著差异;教师报告在知识(P=.002)和技能(P=.007)方面的信心低于毕业生。

结论

需要为 DNP 项目教师开展质量改进知识和技能的教师发展工作。

相似文献

1
DNP Program Faculty and Graduates' Knowledge and Use of QI and Safety Processes.DNP 项目教师和毕业生对质量改进和安全流程的知识和使用情况。
Nurse Educ. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):11-16. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000677.
2
Practice and Quality Improvement Leaders Survey of Expectations of DNP Graduates' Quality Improvement Expertise.实践与质量改进领导者对 DNP 毕业生质量改进专业知识的期望调查。
Nurse Educ. 2021;46(6):361-365. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001009.
3
The DNP project: Quandaries for nursing scholars.护理实践博士项目:护理学者面临的困境
Nurs Outlook. 2017 Jan-Feb;65(1):84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
Strategies for developing faculty confidence and competencies to mentor quality improvement DNP projects.提升教师信心和能力以指导高质量 DNP 项目的策略。
J Prof Nurs. 2023 Jul-Aug;47:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Doctor of Nursing Practice Project Advisement: A Roadmap for Faculty and Student Success.护理实践博士项目指导:教师与学生成功之路。
J Nurs Educ. 2019 Dec 1;58(12):728-732. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20191120-09.
6
Model for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects Based on Cross-Fertilization Between Improvement and Implementation Sciences: Protocol for Quality Improvement and Program Evaluation Studies.基于改进科学与实施科学交叉融合的护理实践博士项目模型:质量改进与项目评估研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jan 31;13:e54213. doi: 10.2196/54213.
7
Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty: a comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.日本博士生护理教育的学生、毕业生和教师评估:基于横断面问卷调查的比较研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 May;32(4):361-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
8
Mentoring students engaging in scholarly projects and dissertations in doctoral nursing programs.指导博士生参与学术项目和论文写作。
Nurs Outlook. 2019 Nov-Dec;67(6):776-788. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
9
Determinants for effective collaboration among DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty.护理实践博士和哲学博士学历教师之间有效合作的决定因素。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 Jan-Feb;65(1):94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
10
Inconsistency in Faculty and Student Perceptions of DNP and PhD Leader Scholarly Activity.教师和学生对 DNP 和 PhD 领导者学术活动的看法存在不一致。
J Nurs Adm. 2021 Jan;51(1):49-54. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000966.