Department of Business Administration, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
Department of Economics, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0215685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215685. eCollection 2019.
This experimental study of an artificial stock market investigates what explains the propensity to sell stocks and thus the disposition effect. It is a framed field experiment that follows the steps of a previous observational study of investor behavior in the Finnish stock market. Our experimental approach has an edge over the observational study in that it can control extraneous variables and two or more groups can be compared. We consider in particular the groups of amateur students and professional investors because it is well established in the literature that the disposition effect is less pronounced in professionals. The disposition effect was measured by both the traditional metric and a broader one that properly considers return intervals. A full logit model with control variables was employed in the latter case. As a result, we replicate for the broader definition what already has been found for the traditional measure: that investor experience dampens the disposition effect. Trades with positive returns exhibited higher propensity to sell than trades with negative returns. For the overall sample of participants, we find the disposition effect cannot be explained by prospect theory, but we cast doubt on this stance from partitions of data from amateurs and professionals.
本实验性的人工股票市场研究旨在探讨哪些因素导致了股票抛售倾向,从而解释了处置效应。这是一项框架式实地实验,遵循了先前对芬兰股票市场投资者行为的观察性研究的步骤。与观察性研究相比,我们的实验方法具有优势,因为它可以控制外部变量,并且可以比较两个或更多的组。我们特别考虑了业余学生和专业投资者这两个群体,因为文献中已经证实,专业人士的处置效应不那么明显。我们通过传统指标和更广泛的指标来衡量处置效应,后者适当地考虑了回报区间。在后一种情况下,我们使用了带有控制变量的全对数模型。因此,我们对更广泛的定义进行了复制,对于传统指标已经发现的情况:即投资者经验会抑制处置效应。正回报的交易比负回报的交易更倾向于卖出。对于整个参与者样本,我们发现处置效应不能用前景理论来解释,但我们对来自业余和专业人士数据分区的这一立场表示怀疑。