• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨折作为骨质疏松症指标的认识不足。

Under-Recognition of Fractures as Osteoporosis Indicators.

作者信息

Lagari Violet S, Al-Yatama Fatima, Rodriguez Gracielena, Berger Hara R, Levis Silvina

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1400 NW 10th Ave Suite 807 Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Endocrinology Section, Miami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, 1201 NW 16th St (11GRC), Miami, FL 33125, USA.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 Jan 9;4(1):9. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics4010009.

DOI:10.3390/geriatrics4010009
PMID:31023977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6473876/
Abstract

After the first fracture, the risk of subsequent fractures increases significantly. Medical treatment can reduce the risk of a second fracture by about 50%, but many older adults do not receive osteoporosis medication following their first fracture. This observational study aimed to understand primary care management patterns of older adults after osteoporotic fractures at the Miami Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. A retrospective review of 219 fracture cases selected by International Classification of Disease (ICD-9) codes between October 2015 and September 2016 identified 114 individuals age ≥50 years who had a non-traumatic fracture code entered in their medical record for the first time. Among them, 72 (63%) did not undergo a bone mineral density (BMD) test or receive treatment in the 12 months following their fracture. Of the 40 individuals who had a BMD test post-fracture, 17 (100%) received or were considered for anti-osteoporosis treatment if their T-score indicated osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5), but only 8/23 (35%) if the T-score was >-2.5. Physicians are more likely to prescribe osteoporosis therapy based on a BMD T-score diagnosis of osteoporosis, rather than a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis based on a low-trauma fracture. A change in practice patterns is necessary to decrease the incidence of fractures.

摘要

首次骨折后,后续骨折的风险会显著增加。医学治疗可将二次骨折的风险降低约50%,但许多老年人在首次骨折后并未接受骨质疏松症药物治疗。这项观察性研究旨在了解迈阿密退伍军人事务(VA)医疗系统中老年人骨质疏松性骨折后的初级保健管理模式。对2015年10月至2016年9月期间根据国际疾病分类(ICD-9)编码选出的219例骨折病例进行回顾性分析,确定了114名年龄≥50岁且首次在病历中录入非创伤性骨折编码的个体。其中,72人(63%)在骨折后的12个月内未进行骨密度(BMD)检测或接受治疗。在骨折后进行了BMD检测的40人中,如果T值表明患有骨质疏松症(T值≤-2.5),17人(100%)接受了或被考虑接受抗骨质疏松治疗,但如果T值>-2.5,只有8/23(35%)的人接受了治疗。医生更倾向于根据BMD T值诊断的骨质疏松症来开骨质疏松症治疗药物,而不是基于低创伤骨折的临床诊断。有必要改变实践模式以降低骨折发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f88b/6473876/9f77d6763103/geriatrics-04-00009-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f88b/6473876/9f77d6763103/geriatrics-04-00009-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f88b/6473876/9f77d6763103/geriatrics-04-00009-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Under-Recognition of Fractures as Osteoporosis Indicators.骨折作为骨质疏松症指标的认识不足。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 Jan 9;4(1):9. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics4010009.
2
Disparities in osteoporosis treatments.骨质疏松症治疗方面的差异。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):509-19. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3249-0. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
3
A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures.一项关于两种不同基于信息的干预措施对轻度和中度创伤性骨折骨质疏松症管理效果的随机研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(9):1309-17. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0078-1. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
4
Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.患有和未患有骨质疏松骨密度的老年女性和男性脆性骨折后再次骨折和死亡的风险:达博骨质疏松症流行病学研究
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Apr;30(4):637-46. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2393.
5
Management of osteoporosis in women aged 50 and older with osteoporosis-related fractures in a managed care population.对管理式医疗人群中50岁及以上患有骨质疏松相关骨折的女性进行骨质疏松症管理。
Dis Manag. 2003 Summer;6(2):83-91. doi: 10.1089/109350703321908469.
6
Use of Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) as a Complementary Approach to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for Fracture Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice.在临床实践中使用小梁骨评分(TBS)作为双能X线吸收法(DXA)的补充方法进行骨折风险评估。
J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):334-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
The importance of previous fracture site on osteoporosis diagnosis and incident fractures in women.既往骨折部位对骨质疏松症诊断和女性骨折事件的重要性。
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Jul;29(7):1675-80. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2204.
8
Low-trauma fractures and bone mineral density testing in adults with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities: a population study.有智力和发育障碍与无智力和发育障碍成年人的低创伤性骨折和骨矿物质密度检测:一项人群研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Feb;28(2):727-732. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3740-2. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
9
Prevalence of bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis management following low- and high-energy fractures.低能量和高能量骨折后骨密度检测及骨质疏松症管理的患病率
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(5):318-22. doi: 10.3944/aott.2013.3065.
10
Bone mineral density predicts osteoporotic fractures in elderly men: the MINOS study.骨密度可预测老年男性骨质疏松性骨折:MINOS研究
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Oct;16(10):1184-92. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1970-9. Epub 2005 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Severe Proximal Humerus Fracture and Correlation Between Deltoid Tuberosity Index and Bone Mineral Density.肱骨近端严重骨折的危险因素及三角肌粗隆指数与骨密度的相关性
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Jul 6;11:2151459320938571. doi: 10.1177/2151459320938571. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Rush Fracture Liaison Service for capturing "missed opportunities" to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures.脆性骨折联络服务,以捕捉治疗脆性骨折患者骨质疏松症的“错失机会”。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1861-1874. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4559-9. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
2
A quality improvement initiative on the management of osteoporosis in older people with Parkinsonism.一项关于帕金森病老年患者骨质疏松症管理的质量改进倡议。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Oct 25;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u210921.w5756. eCollection 2016.
3
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS - 2016.
美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会临床实践指南:绝经后骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗 - 2016 年版。
Endocr Pract. 2016 Sep 2;22(Suppl 4):1-42. doi: 10.4158/EP161435.GL.
4
The effect of 6 versus 9 years of zoledronic acid treatment in osteoporosis: a randomized second extension to the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT).唑来膦酸治疗骨质疏松症6年与9年的效果:HORIZON关键骨折试验(PFT)的随机二次延长期研究
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 May;30(5):934-44. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2442.
5
Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis.骨质疏松症防治临床指南
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
6
Osteoporosis screening and treatment among veterans with recent fracture after implementation of an electronic consult service.电子咨询服务实施后,近期骨折退伍军人的骨质疏松症筛查和治疗。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2014 Jun;94(6):659-64. doi: 10.1007/s00223-014-9849-4. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
7
Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011.2002年至2011年间美国髋部骨折患者使用骨质疏松症药物的情况。
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Sep;29(9):1929-37. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2202.
8
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会成人降低动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险的血胆固醇治疗指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S1-45. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention.避免首次骨折成为最后一次骨折:ASBMR 工作组关于二次骨折预防的报告。
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Oct;27(10):2039-46. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1698. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
10
Results of indirect and mixed treatment comparison of fracture efficacy for osteoporosis treatments: a meta-analysis.骨质疏松症治疗骨折疗效的间接和混合治疗比较的meta 分析结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jan;24(1):209-17. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2068-9. Epub 2012 Jul 26.