• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种新型光动力疗法(Flexitheralight)与传统治疗方法相比治疗光化性角化病的非劣效性:一项2期研究方案。

Evaluating the Noninferiority of a New Photodynamic Therapy (Flexitheralight) Compared With Conventional Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study.

作者信息

Lecomte Fabienne, Vignion-Dewalle Anne Sophie, Vicentini Claire, Thecua Elise, Deleporte Pascal, Duhamel Alain, Mordon Serge, Mortier Laurent

机构信息

U1189 - Image Assisted Laser Therapies for Oncology, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Lille, Université de Lille, Lille, France.

Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Lille, Université de Lille, Lille, France.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(4):e11530. doi: 10.2196/11530.

DOI:10.2196/11530
PMID:31025952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6658309/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) is characterized by preinvasive, cancerous lesions on sun-exposed skin that negatively affect patient quality of life and may progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). If untreated, AK may either regress or progress to SCC, with significant morbidity and possible lethal outcomes. The most commonly used treatments for AK are cryotherapy, topical chemotherapy and, more recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT). This clinical study is part of a project that aims to create specific light-emitting fabrics (LEFs) that strongly improve the efficiency and reliability of PDT as a treatment for AK.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new PDT protocol involving the Flexitheralight device (N-PDT) with the classical protocol involving the Aktilite CL 128 device (C-PDT; Galderma Laboratories) for the treatment of AK. All participants receive both protocols. The primary objective of this study is to compare the lesion response rate after 3 months of N-PDT with C-PDT. Secondary objectives are evaluations of pain and local tolerance during treatment, clinical evolution of the subject's skin, and evaluations of patient quality of life and satisfaction.

METHODS

The study is a split-face, intraindividual comparison of two PDT protocols. The total number of patients recruited was 42. Patients were exposed to a continuous red light with the Aktilite CL 128 device on one side of the face and to fractionated red illumination with the new device, Flexitheralight, on the other side of the face. Males or females over the age of 18 years with a clinical diagnosis of at least 10 previously untreated, nonpigmented, nonhyperkeratotic grade I and II AK lesions of the forehead and/or scalp were included and were recruited from the Department of Dermatology of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille. The patients came to the investigational center for one treatment session (day 1), and they were followed up after 7 days, 3 months and 6 months. A second treatment session was performed on day 111 in cases in which an incomplete response was observed at the 3-month follow-up. Data will be analyzed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc). Continuous variables will be reported as means and standard deviations, and categorical variables will be reported as frequencies and percentages. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to assess the normality of the distribution.

RESULTS

The clinical investigation was performed by July 2018. Data analysis was performed at the end of 2018, and results are expected to be published in early 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase II clinical trial aims to evaluate the noninferior efficacy and superior tolerability of N-PDT compared to that of C-PDT. If N-PDT is both efficacious and tolerable, N-PDT could become the treatment of choice for AK due to its ease of implementation in hospitals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03076918; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03076918 (archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/771KA0SSK).

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/11530.

摘要

背景

光化性角化病(AK)的特征是在暴露于阳光的皮肤上出现癌前病变,这会对患者的生活质量产生负面影响,并可能发展为浸润性鳞状细胞癌(SCC)。如果不进行治疗,AK可能会消退或发展为SCC,从而导致严重的发病率和可能的致命后果。AK最常用的治疗方法是冷冻疗法、局部化疗,以及最近出现的光动力疗法(PDT)。这项临床研究是一个项目的一部分,该项目旨在制造特定的发光织物(LEF),以大幅提高PDT作为AK治疗方法的效率和可靠性。

目的

本研究旨在比较一种新的使用Flexitheralight设备的PDT方案(N-PDT)与经典的使用Aktilite CL 128设备的方案(C-PDT;高德美实验室)在治疗AK方面的疗效和耐受性。所有参与者都接受这两种方案。本研究的主要目的是比较N-PDT与C-PDT治疗3个月后的皮损反应率。次要目的是评估治疗期间的疼痛和局部耐受性、受试者皮肤的临床演变情况,以及评估患者的生活质量和满意度。

方法

该研究是对两种PDT方案进行的半脸、个体内比较。招募的患者总数为42名。患者一侧面部使用Aktilite CL 128设备接受连续红光照射,另一侧面部使用新设备Flexitheralight接受分次红光照射。纳入年龄在18岁以上、临床诊断为前额和/或头皮至少有10处先前未治疗的、无色素沉着、无角化过度的I级和II级AK皮损的男性或女性,这些患者来自里尔大学中心医院皮肤科。患者到研究中心接受一次治疗(第1天),并在7天、3个月和6个月后进行随访。在3个月随访时观察到反应不完全的病例,在第111天进行第二次治疗。数据将使用SAS 9.4版软件(SAS研究所)进行分析。连续变量将以均值和标准差报告,分类变量将以频率和百分比报告。将使用夏皮罗-威尔克检验来评估分布的正态性。

结果

临床研究于2018年7月完成。数据分析于2018年底进行,结果预计于2019年初发表。

结论

这项II期临床试验旨在评估N-PDT与C-PDT相比的非劣效性疗效和更好的耐受性。如果N-PDT既有效又耐受,由于其在医院易于实施,N-PDT可能会成为AK的首选治疗方法。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03076918;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03076918(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/771KA0SSK)。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/11530。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/93fb5cfdabbe/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/a47252e67e1d/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/185a974b9bb2/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/467293ff520a/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/cc67ba153e08/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/80e78cbaae72/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/fb0afab0342f/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/93fb5cfdabbe/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/a47252e67e1d/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/185a974b9bb2/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/467293ff520a/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/cc67ba153e08/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/80e78cbaae72/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/fb0afab0342f/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da64/6658309/93fb5cfdabbe/resprot_v8i4e11530_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Noninferiority of a New Photodynamic Therapy (Flexitheralight) Compared With Conventional Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study.评估一种新型光动力疗法(Flexitheralight)与传统治疗方法相比治疗光化性角化病的非劣效性:一项2期研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(4):e11530. doi: 10.2196/11530.
2
A New Light-Emitting, Fabric-Based Device for Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Intra-Individual, Phase II Noninferiority Study (the Phosistos Study).一种用于光化性角化病光动力治疗的新型发光织物基装置:一项随机、对照、多中心、个体内、II期非劣效性研究方案(Phosistos研究)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(4):e12990. doi: 10.2196/12990.
3
Photodynamic Therapy Using a New Painless Light-Emitting Fabrics Device in the Treatment of Extramammary Paget Disease of the Vulva (the PAGETEX Study): Protocol for an Interventional Efficacy and Safety Trial.使用新型无痛发光织物装置进行光动力疗法治疗外阴部乳房外佩吉特病(PAGETEX研究):一项介入性疗效与安全性试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(12):e15026. doi: 10.2196/15026.
4
Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the forehead and scalp: a randomized, controlled, phase II clinical study evaluating the noninferiority of a new protocol involving irradiation with a light-emitting, fabric-based device (the Flexitheralight protocol) compared with the conventional protocol involving irradiation with the Aktilite CL 128 lamp.光动力疗法治疗额部和头皮光化性角化病:一项随机、对照、二期临床研究,评估一种新方案(Flexitheralight 方案,涉及使用发光织物设备进行辐照)与传统方案(涉及使用 Aktilite CL 128 灯进行辐照)的非劣效性。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Apr;180(4):765-773. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17350. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
5
The conventional protocol vs. a protocol including illumination with a fabric-based biophotonic device (the Phosistos protocol) in photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical study.用于光化性角化病光动力治疗的传统方案与包含基于织物的生物光子设备照射的方案(Phosistos方案)对比:一项随机、对照、非劣效性临床研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jan;182(1):76-84. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18048. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Photodynamic therapy using aminolaevulinic acid for patients with nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratoses of the face and scalp: phase IV multicentre clinical trial with 12-month follow up.使用氨基乙酰丙酸对面部和头皮非角化过度性光化性角化病患者进行光动力疗法:一项为期12个月随访的IV期多中心临床试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Dec;155(6):1262-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07520.x.
7
Red light photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis using 37 J/cm : Fractionated irradiation with 12.3 mW/cm after 30 minutes incubation time compared to standard continuous irradiation with 75 mW/cm after 3 hours incubation time using a mathematical modeling.采用37 J/cm的红光光动力疗法治疗光化性角化病:与使用数学模型在3小时孵育时间后以75 mW/cm进行标准连续照射相比,在30分钟孵育时间后以12.3 mW/cm进行分次照射。
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Sep;49(7):686-697. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22665. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
8
Split-face study comparing conventional MAL photodynamic therapy in multiple actinic keratosis with complete time vs. half-time red light LED conventional illumination.比较传统 MAL 光动力疗法与全时与半时红光 LED 常规照射治疗多发性光化性角化病的对照研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Aug;33(8):1529-1534. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15566. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
Efficacy of different photoprotection strategies in preventing actinic keratosis new lesions after photodynamic therapy. The ATHENA study: a two-center, randomized, prospective, assessor-blinded pragmatic trial.不同光保护策略在预防光动力疗法后光化性角化病新皮损中的疗效。ATHENA 研究:一项两中心、随机、前瞻性、评估者设盲实用临床试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Jan;35(1):141-145. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1544887. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: Is the European consensus protocol for daylight PDT superior to conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128 PDT?光动力疗法治疗光化性角化病:日光 PD 治疗的欧洲共识方案是否优于 Aktilite CL 128 PD 治疗的常规方案?
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2017 Sep;174:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Photodynamic Therapy Using a New Painless Light-Emitting Fabrics Device in the Treatment of Extramammary Paget Disease of the Vulva (the PAGETEX Study): Protocol for an Interventional Efficacy and Safety Trial.使用新型无痛发光织物装置进行光动力疗法治疗外阴部乳房外佩吉特病(PAGETEX研究):一项介入性疗效与安全性试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(12):e15026. doi: 10.2196/15026.
2
A New Light-Emitting, Fabric-Based Device for Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Intra-Individual, Phase II Noninferiority Study (the Phosistos Study).一种用于光化性角化病光动力治疗的新型发光织物基装置:一项随机、对照、多中心、个体内、II期非劣效性研究方案(Phosistos研究)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(4):e12990. doi: 10.2196/12990.

本文引用的文献

1
Nonmelanoma skin cancer - from actinic keratosis to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.非黑色素瘤皮肤癌——从光化性角化病到皮肤鳞状细胞癌。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2018 Aug;16(8):1002-1013. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13614.
2
Actinic keratosis - review for clinical practice.光化性角化病——临床实践综述。
Int J Dermatol. 2019 Apr;58(4):400-407. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14147. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
3
From actinic keratosis to squamous cell carcinoma: pathophysiology revisited.从光化性角化病到鳞状细胞癌:病理生理学再探讨。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Mar;31 Suppl 2:5-7. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14151.
4
European Dermatology Forum Guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy.欧洲皮肤病学论坛关于局部光动力疗法的指南
Eur J Dermatol. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):296-311. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2015.2570.
5
Update on photodynamic treatment for actinic keratosis.光动力疗法治疗光化性角化病的最新进展。
Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;46:122-8. doi: 10.1159/000366548. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
6
Light emitting fabric technologies for photodynamic therapy.用于光动力疗法的发光织物技术
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2015 Mar;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Response to Letter to the editor: 'European guidelines for topical PDT part 1. JEADV 2013;27:536-544' DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12258.对致编辑信的回复:“欧洲局部光动力疗法指南第1部分。《欧洲皮肤病与性病学杂志》2013年;27:536 - 544” 数字对象标识符:10.1111/jdv.12258
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jul;29(7):1451-2. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12506. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
8
Epidemiology of skin cancer: role of some environmental factors.皮肤癌的流行病学:一些环境因素的作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2010 Nov 24;2(4):1980-9. doi: 10.3390/cancers2041980.
9
Actinic keratosis: review of the literature and new patents.光化性角化病:文献综述与新专利
Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2013 May;7(2):168-75. doi: 10.2174/1872213x11307020008.
10
Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical assessment of human skin field cancerization before and after photodynamic therapy.光动力疗法前后人体皮肤癌前病变的临床、组织病理学和免疫组织化学评估。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jul;167(1):150-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10887.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.