Suppr超能文献

乙酰水杨酸脱敏在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的荟萃分析。

Meta-Analysis of Acetylsalicylic Acid Desensitization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

机构信息

Self Employed, Chemical Engineer/Medical Researcher, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;124(1):14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.047. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

Abstract

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) hypersensitivity represents a clinical challenge in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients urgently requiring ASA for antiplatelet therapy. ASA desensitization has been reported with successful outcomes in cardiac patients. The aim of this review is to determine the safety and efficacy of ASA desensitization therapy in ACS patients. A PubMed database search was conducted for articles containing combinations of keywords, "aspirin desensitization" or "aspirin hypersensitivity" and "acute coronary syndrome" between January 1, 1990 and August 1, 2018. The primary end point was desensitization protocol success. Secondary end points included hypersensitivity adverse events and ASA discontinuation due to hypersensitivity adverse events at follow-up. Fifteen reports consisting of 480 ACS patients with previous hypersensitivity to ASA were included. The pooled desensitization success rate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval: 97.2% to 99.5%). There was no statistical difference in outcomes between protocols ≤ 2 hours and > 2 hours in duration (96.3[92.3 to 100.3]% vs 97.2[94.6 to 99.8]%; p = 0.71). Protocols with > 6 dose escalations were associated with higher success rates compared to those with ≤ 6 doses (99.2[97.9 to 100.4]% vs 95.4[93 to 97.8]%; p = 0.007). At follow-up between 1 and 46 months (mode 12 months), zero hypersensitivity adverse events were reported. Consequently, no ASA discontinuations were related to hypersensitivity adverse events. In conclusion, ASA desensitization therapy is safe and effective in patients with ACS. Protocols with > 6 dose escalations may be optimal for ASA desensitization in ACS patients.

摘要

阿司匹林(ASA)过敏反应在急需 ASA 进行抗血小板治疗的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中构成临床挑战。已有报道称,心脏患者可通过脱敏治疗获得成功。本综述旨在确定 ACS 患者中 ASA 脱敏治疗的安全性和有效性。我们对 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 1 日期间PubMed 数据库中包含关键字“阿司匹林脱敏”或“阿司匹林过敏”和“急性冠脉综合征”的文章进行了检索。主要终点是脱敏方案成功。次要终点包括过敏反应不良事件以及随访时因过敏反应不良事件而停用 ASA。纳入了 15 项报告,共包含 480 例先前对 ASA 过敏的 ACS 患者。汇总脱敏成功率为 98.3%(95%置信区间:97.2%至 99.5%)。持续时间≤2 小时和>2 小时的方案之间在结局方面无统计学差异(96.3%[92.3%至 100.3%]与 97.2%[94.6%至 99.8%];p=0.71)。与≤6 个剂量递增相比,剂量递增>6 个的方案与更高的成功率相关(99.2%[97.9%至 100.4%]与 95.4%[93%至 97.8%];p=0.007)。在 1 至 46 个月(模式为 12 个月)的随访期间,无过敏反应不良事件报告。因此,没有因过敏反应不良事件而停用 ASA。综上,ASA 脱敏治疗在 ACS 患者中安全且有效。剂量递增>6 个的方案可能是 ACS 患者 ASA 脱敏的最佳方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验